Who's censoring the threads?

I have provided an update to this discussion, picking up right where we left off with Perković.
The subject matter remains both relevant and enduring.
Has someone actually gone so far as to delete the entries and lock this entire thread?!
I find myself wondering about the motive and the identity of whoever is responsible.

So, now we’re digging up threads from 2005 just to circle back to the same old arguments? You want to talk about Perković on one thread and then jump over to some archived mess about the FBI on another.

There’s actually a more recent discussion about those CIA Agents, but you clearly missed it while scavenging through the "dead" archives—especially since this one you found from 2005 barely had ten posts to begin with.

I can only imagine how much you'd complain if you actually got flagged for reviving such an ancient thread.

Besides, who’s stopping you from digging through the archives to start a decent conversation on the Politics board?

If you want to discuss Perković, stick to his dedicated thread. It's right here:

My intention is to discuss the CIA, rather than focusing solely on Perković.
Ostoja has already opened this discussion with quite a bit of depth, and I see no reason to duplicate topics, regardless of how old they might be, provided they remain relevant to us today.

We are dealing here with an entire organization, not just one individual, which means it would be a mistake to limit our scope to a single thread about Perković.

I believe Ostoja’s thread provides a much more thoughtful starting point than the more recent one you mentioned.

Just compile everything properly and start a legitimate thread for once. Put in some actual effort instead of reviving an old topic with a single half-baked sentence like this

Honestly, it's embarrassing.

Then there's this nonsense about the CIA... suggesting the CIA founded the Republican Party???

Charles Fox10 said:In that case, why don't you just compile everything into one coherent thought and start a proper thread instead of dragging up an old topic over a single half-sentence like this one

And then we have this nonsense about the CIA... suggesting the CIA created the Republican Party???

Dear Charles Fox10,
As I previously mentioned, the original thread was quite substantive and, given current events, remains incredibly relevant.
I have simply supplemented it with several links and observations that you had previously removed.
It is merely what is necessary.
I shall continue to write, and then observe how you proceed to delete my contributions.
Please, allow the discussion regarding the CIA to proceed; doing so would be a true demonstration of your impartiality.

jadeseal4 said:Dear Charles Fox10,
I thought the subject was quite high-quality—certainly relevant given how things are moving lately.
I added some links and commentary, though you seem to have scrubbed them.
Whatever.
I’ll keep writing and just watch you delete everything.
Go ahead and allow a thread about the FBI; let's see how "unbiased" you really are.

Not from 2005. Start a new one and include all five.