CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Moderation issues regarding Hillary Clinton

Moderation issues regarding Hillary Clinton

Started by redhawk76 · · 👁 7 views · 20 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants redhawk76Brenda Taylor13northernsailor8Michelle EvansWilliam Bennett53crimsonjackal63Peter Sanders4Adam Barrettlonebadger6Thomas Hayes2
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#21 ·
Look, Spahn, you’ve already been given all the answers. It’s unfortunate you aren't satisfied with them, but this isn't the place to vent your frustrations. At the end of the day, anything that can be said about Oliver Stone, Ante Tomic, or Madeleine Albright could just as easily be said about Kamala Harris. Achieving perfect balance isn't always easy, which is precisely why we have human moderators making decisions rather than leaving it to some mindless computer algorithm. Most comments directed at politicians will be allowed to stand; some will be deleted, others will result in a warning, and some might face both. The criteria for these actions have already been laid out in the previous posts.

If a significant majority of forum members decides to advocate for banning harsh language toward politicians altogether, then we can certainly open a discussion on the matter. However, if such a rule were implemented, it would apply to everyone equally; Kamala Harris won't receive any special treatment.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads