CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Jack the Giant Killer (2012)

Jack the Giant Killer (2012)

Started by Rachel Young3 · · 👁 10 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rachel Young3casualravenrowdyowlnimblemarlin6cosmiclynx57Brandon Cruz81Christian Cook6frozenviper13Rachel Ortiz33Nicole JonesDavid Murphy11silvertiger11Susan Hernandezhollowmaker242Mark Walker97George Peterson3Melissa Sanchez16
silvertiger11 silvertiger11 Active Member
106 messages
joined Jul 2016
#21 ·
A fairy tale for the little ones.

Based on the title and the trailer, I was expecting something with a bit more grit and a darker tone, but clearly, that wasn't on the menu (it would have felt way too much like Hansel & Gretel). There’s plenty of action and destruction, yet there isn't a single drop of blood to be found. While the characters are decent enough, their gags and antics feel dated and predictable.

The movie doesn't have any glaring flaws, but it's far from being anything special. It's a solid two hours to sit down and watch with the kids.
Susan Hernandez Susan Hernandez Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2011
#22 ·
So, is this actually more boring than Hansel & Gretel?
Rachel Ortiz33 Rachel Ortiz33 Active Member
84 messages
joined Jul 2012
#23 ·
Benjamin Ruiz60 said:So you're saying it's even more of a snooze than Hansel & Gretel?

Man, Hansel & Gretel is such a classic!! 😁
silvertiger11 silvertiger11 Active Member
106 messages
joined Jul 2016
#24 ·
Benjamin Ruiz60 said:So, you're saying it's even more tedious than Hansel & Gretel?

Oh, I'm saying it's boring in a completely different way.

Hansel & Gretel is just a mindless slasher flick full of gore, gratuitous nudity, and cheesy one-liners.
Jack and the Beanstalk, on the other hand, is a proper fairy tale complete with giants, enchanted realms, and noble knights.

The whole vibe feels remarkably similar to First Knight starring Richard Gere.
hollowmaker242 hollowmaker242 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Apr 2004
#25 ·
I really enjoyed this one.
It’s just easy, two-hour entertainment right from your couch.
Would I have wasted my time or money at a theater? Probably not. But watching it at home? A solid 4/5.
Mark Walker97 Mark Walker97 Member
21 messages
joined Mar 2016
#26 ·
hollowmaker242 said:I actually liked the movie.
It’s solid, low-effort two-hour entertainment for a night in front of the TV.
If I’d sat through this in a theater, I would have felt ripped off—both in cash and time—but watching it at home? 4/5.

So, if you pay for a bad movie, it's a bad movie.
But if you watch that exact same movie for free, suddenly it's "much better"?

Is that some kind of communalist, hippie logic for rating films??? 😁
George Peterson3 George Peterson3 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2013
#27 ·
Has anyone happened to stumble upon a version where the aspect ratio is set to 1.85 instead of the standard 2.40?
I realize you can technically zoom in, but then you end up stretching the frame, which just makes the whole thing look amateurish and distorted...
Melissa Sanchez16 Melissa Sanchez16 Member
14 messages
joined Feb 2014
#28 ·
Total waste of time. Not even worth discussing. Kids will probably love it, though.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads