CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Complaint against moderator [long]

Complaint against moderator [long]

Started by Timothy Hall4 · · 👁 3 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Timothy Hall4Daniel Ward87Charles Bailey45
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#1 ·
I am filing a formal complaint against the moderator Charles Bailey4 regarding the "Cycling" subreddit due to inconsistent enforcement, biased moderation, and the active undermining of other users' posts. I apologize in advance if this thread is formatted incorrectly; I simply could not locate the specific guidelines for submitting a grievance.

In the "Used Gear & Classifieds" thread, Charles Bailey4 tends to delete posts based on his own subjective whims rather than following established community rules. Even if moderators are permitted to set their own guidelines, the double standards being applied here are significant.

Charles Bailey4, along with another user, teamed up to disparage a third user's listing. While criticizing an unfair deal is one thing, using multiple posts to tear down an ad that fully complied with both sub rules and thread guidelines is another matter entirely. Perhaps the seller overestimated their bike's value by $300-$133, but that is their prerogative, and a moderator's comments carry undue weight among the community.

After I attempted to explain that their behavior was inappropriate, they turned on me. Following several deletions, the only remaining posts are those labeling me as a scammer or a fraud. To make matters worse, Charles Bailey4 explicitly called me a scammer in his own explanatory post. Furthermore, they singled out my listing to mock and undermine it, despite the price being perfectly reasonable.

To top it off, he followed up with a provocative comment suggesting, "See what we have to deal with...", implying I am somehow incompetent.

In a private message sent regarding my warning, he even noted that he doesn't care about the actual market value of items. If the valuation isn't his concern, I fail to see why he feels the need to critique the ads. The only logical conclusion is that he was trolling and abusing his authority.

I believe this type of conduct is unacceptable and warrants disciplinary action. I am willing to accept a few warnings for my tone, but moderators should be held to the same standard and held accountable for their mistakes through a formal apology.
Daniel Ward87 Daniel Ward87 Active Member
195 messages
joined May 2023
#2 ·
Got any links you can drop to back all that up?
Charles Bailey45 Charles Bailey45 Member
23 messages
joined Jan 2015
#3 ·
Honestly, given the sheer amount of nonsense, paranoid theories, and wild conclusions you've been throwing out—not to mention the direct insults aimed at me and the rest of the community, plus your constant habit of posting MY private messages to YOU—I’m not even going to bother giving you a real response. Why bother? I know I'll just end up getting another insult or some dismissive "whatever" once you run out of actual arguments.

Your last message, which I'm sure Daniel Ward87 will see for himself, is really just the icing on the cake.

The thread has been cleaned up exactly like you asked. You've made your true character and behavior crystal clear, so as far as I'm concerned, this whole situation is over.

Take care.
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#4 ·
Daniel Ward87 said:Do you happen to have a link that might actually verify these claims of yours?

Here is the link to that thread. The original post that kicked off this whole discussion was post number... 908 The discussion that followed lasted about a page or so, I guess.

I suppose I should probably address what Daniel Ward87 mentioned earlier. It seems like everyone is jumping to conclusions without actually looking at the data. Maybe we aren't seeing the full picture here. I mean, if you look at how things are moving in Chicago right now, it doesn't exactly suggest that the policies are working as intended. I guess it’s possible there are outliers, but I wouldn't bet on it. It feels like a bit of a stretch to say everything is fine. Not that I'm an expert, obviously.

All the posts have been wiped now, but if I'm not mistaken, the admins can still see everything that was deleted.
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#5 ·
Daniel Ward87 said:Do you happen to have a link that might actually back up those claims of yours?

Have you checked the thread? I wonder if there’s been any kind of decision yet.
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#6 ·
bumping this
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#7 ·
Is anyone actually around? Daniel Ward87?
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#8 ·
Is anything actually happening here, or what? Do I need to start bribing people just to get a response?
Timothy Hall4 Timothy Hall4 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Sep 2011
#9 ·
bumping this thread

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads