#1 ·
I love it when people just declare there’s nothing left to say once they’ve finished criticizing the management and shutting down the topic...
This is my response to the thread about what exactly is wrong with this site. It gave me some things to chew on. 😬
One word: nepotism. Second: inconsistency. Third: double standards.
Sure, this platform is private property, but let me ask you something—is one troll really worth more than a handful of decent users?
Why are the regulars getting stepped on while the trolls get a pat on the back? 🤷>
Just so nobody gets their feelings hurt?
Why is "polite" insults allowed? How is that supposed to be constructive discussion? People turn around and lecture me on morality, yet they'll claim they haven't experienced a single real thing in their lives. And then the punishment is just having to admit you wrote something, whereas on another thread, if a mod pulls someone's data, it's considered totally fine.
Yes, since this is a private forum, you can permaban anyone without a shred of guilt. And that is exactly what happens. It is Fascinating, though, how the bans don't happen when actual questions are being asked; instead, a hundred excuses are manufactured just so the troll doesn't feel offended. 🤣
Neither the mods nor the admins should ever allow users to be insulted and then call it "discussion."
We all have opinions about the people we see around here all the time, but if the mods and admins aren't setting the standard, what are we even expecting?
You reap what you sow. Reddit used to have a reputation for being a breeding ground for spam, garbage, nepotism, and cliques. I joined, took a look around, and thought the situation had improved. It's Fascinating how much a person can realize in just a few months.
This is my response to the thread about what exactly is wrong with this site. It gave me some things to chew on. 😬
One word: nepotism. Second: inconsistency. Third: double standards.
Sure, this platform is private property, but let me ask you something—is one troll really worth more than a handful of decent users?
Why are the regulars getting stepped on while the trolls get a pat on the back? 🤷>
Just so nobody gets their feelings hurt?
Why is "polite" insults allowed? How is that supposed to be constructive discussion? People turn around and lecture me on morality, yet they'll claim they haven't experienced a single real thing in their lives. And then the punishment is just having to admit you wrote something, whereas on another thread, if a mod pulls someone's data, it's considered totally fine.
Yes, since this is a private forum, you can permaban anyone without a shred of guilt. And that is exactly what happens. It is Fascinating, though, how the bans don't happen when actual questions are being asked; instead, a hundred excuses are manufactured just so the troll doesn't feel offended. 🤣
Neither the mods nor the admins should ever allow users to be insulted and then call it "discussion."
We all have opinions about the people we see around here all the time, but if the mods and admins aren't setting the standard, what are we even expecting?
You reap what you sow. Reddit used to have a reputation for being a breeding ground for spam, garbage, nepotism, and cliques. I joined, took a look around, and thought the situation had improved. It's Fascinating how much a person can realize in just a few months.
I personally saw "The Persephone Case" right before the posts were deleted. I didn't have time to save them because I refreshed the page to see what on earth was happening—the posts were gone, and I couldn't even see the reason for the red card. I remember the "justifications" regarding reputation. It is Fascinating how some people have a reputation, while others can never seem to earn one. 🤣
I also followed "The Euclid Case" quite closely and caught a few posts before they were wiped. That was a case where both moderators were very confidently shouting, "Now we've shown you!" The guy wasn't hiding anything—he actually left an AD stating he was married. But then came the lynching, accusing him of daring to tell a story about being happy when it wasn't with his wife, essentially painting him as some jerk trying to slide into someone else's bed. 🤦
Isn't it sad when the mods join in on the lynching? If they wanted to point out a "potential problem," they could have simply written, "Um, aren't you married?" Just a little nudge to remind everyone on the thread who they were talking about.
On the other hand, is it even necessary? I got reprimanded for commenting on a person rather than their post. Why are mods allowed to comment on people and even insult them, while I or any other user isn't allowed to? Well, I guess some other users can.
I don't need moderator privileges to be online. 🥳 I don't need to be a mod for my friend to be online and spam my inbox with potential nonsense. It is Fascinating how much of it has been piling up lately.
But the truth is, I've personally wondered where this forum is heading several times over the last month. My conclusion is that it isn't going anywhere, and I'll be moving further and further away from it.
It went from a place where I enjoyed spending time to a place that, in a very short window, became somewhere where you can no longer find any rational explanation to justify certain actions.
I’ve spent time acting as both a moderator and an admin on several different forums over the years, covering all sorts of topics. I know firsthand just how thankless that role can be. But I also know this: the teams I was part of always aimed for best practices; we tried to be the gold standard. And I’ll be the first one to say—don't disrespect the mod.
But let’s be real, I can't exactly defend a moderator when they're being a complete jerk to a user. I just can't. I have no patience for double standards.
When a moderator or an admin starts insulting forum members, even if they try to wrap it up in polite packaging, it creates a logical fallacy where people assume that behavior is permitted. It isn't. Not for everyone. Apparently, some people get a pass while others don't.
I haven't been able to find any consistent pattern as to why certain behaviors are tolerated for some individuals and not others. All I've found is a massive pile of contradictions.
Isn't it somewhat symptomatic that so many "exemplary users" end up getting banned or silenced because of a single individual? The reasoning usually goes: "No, no, no, this person is actually right. We can't punish them because what they said wasn't technically against the rules; the way you interpreted it is your own problem. Sure, they troll a little, and maybe they bend the rules occasionally, but who doesn't?"
And then comes the classic: "We're looking into it." I don't see anyone taking months to ban someone who calls out a troll, yet I see cases being "under review" for months on end.
Is it like when the news reports a lunatic driving the wrong way on a major highway, and some guy in his car just starts yelling, "Who cares about one guy? There are hundreds of us!"? ☕