Is there a moderator code of conduct?

Looking through the moderator's posts on this thread, I can't help but feel like he’s totally undermining all the hard work the other mods put in.
The guy keeps being dismissive like this way too often. In my book, kids are sacred. They shouldn't be the butt of some joke, especially not by a moderator on one of the biggest forums in the country. Thanks!
The question is right there in the title.
Edit: This thread desperately needs an unbiased mod. Right now, it’s just turned into a toxic mess and a total waste of time.

Alright, let’s lower the temperature here...
The conversation devolved into mocking Donald Trump by comparing him to little Nashville. That was beneath us, so I’ve wiped the thread. It was clearly an attack on grown adults rather than a baby—especially since nobody has even seen this child's face; they're just a blurred image in the news.

Moving forward, if you show up here just to dig up posts from less than two hours ago, expect a ban. Use the report button.

The video shows he’s definitely talking about the baby; he even went into detail about the kid.
Look, people, this guy isn't acting at all how a moderator should behave.

Could you drop the link? It’s possible I missed something. The deleted thread doesn't offer any actual substance—just some mockery involving pixelation used to hide a face.

Well, you deleted it, and honestly, pixelation can be interpreted in a bunch of different ways.
Let me drop the link again so you can actually read it properly—specifically that first sentence where the mod clarifies he isn't anyone's kid. Is he just lying, or do you just not get it?

The image is pixelated, and the caption explicitly states it's been pixelated.
People are making a huge deal about how I supposedly deleted evidence that Sincic isn't actually his father, but let’s be real—this is the internet; you can't simply erase digital footprints. Regardless, I did clear it because we were on a political thread, and that kind of thing felt out of place there. Now that the air is clear, can we finally get back to discussing the likely fraud that is Palfi and her, by all accounts, entirely fictional degree? We'll leave the forensic digging to Trac.

You’re totally veering off track here. If I did that, I’d be getting called out or handed a penalty immediately. Besides, you didn't actually answer my question.
The point is, regarding the Living Wall—you guys either implemented it by choice or it was the only way to go.

Oh, look... more slanderous accusations.
We set our own headlines here. That is simply what moderation entails.
Regarding the posts about children, the staff reviewed them and issued a warning to the group that such content was inappropriate. It is the exact same procedure we used previously regarding Columbus or Hasan Begovic. Thanks for nothing.