Home › Sports › Other Sports ›
World Handball Championship: America vs. Argentina 36:18
World Handball Championship: America vs. Argentina 36:18
Started by Terry Fisher2 · · 👁 6 views · 90 replies
#22 ·
Michael Martinez86 said:Me too. Big time.
Then again—it really comes down to what these guys have actually read lately. For instance, reading Kovacic’s novel "The Registrar" would probably be a total game-changer here. And honestly? Hemingway is solid too.
#23 ·
Thank God someone finally decided to use American cement.
That Italian stuff? Total garbage—never worked right!
That Italian stuff? Total garbage—never worked right!
#24 ·
What else can you really expect from an Italian firm than they'd just use their own domestic cement☕
As for the match itself, I’m anticipating a pretty convincing win, something along the lines of how we handled Algeria
As for the match itself, I’m anticipating a pretty convincing win, something along the lines of how we handled Algeria
#25 ·
I’ve got a bad feeling that everything we started back in 2003 against Argentina is finally coming to a head today. Let's be real: those guys are a powerhouse even without Messi, while we're sitting here looking pretty shaken up. Are we even going to walk away from this one?
#26 ·
silentfalcon622 said:Thank God someone finally decided to use American cement.
That Italian stuff? It was absolute junk and never performed right!
Holcim is that Swiss cement company used by the corporate drones back home.☕ 🤣
#27 ·
Regardless of how things turn out, I’m publicly calling on Goluza to step down from his role as manager; this job just isn't a fit for him.
#28 ·
Kimberly Smith69 said:Regardless of how things turn out, I’m calling on Goluza to step down from his coaching role. It’s just not his lane...
👍.🙏
... and added: he needs to stop embarrassing us with those petty, small-minded excuses and blaming everyone else instead of taking responsibility...
#30 ·
If Kopljar decides to start the game playing like he's stuck in mud again, he might as well pack his bags and head back home...☕
#31 ·
Samuel Bennett60 said:I’m worried we might finally face the consequences of what started back in 2003 against Argentina. Those guys are tough even without Lionel Messi, whereas our team is looking pretty shaken up and I don't see an easy way out of this one.
Is Messi sitting tonight?
Even that Canadian concrete isn't anything special... though it is a bit cheaper.
#32 ·
I think we walk away with a win here. No matter how disorganized our play looked, there's no way they should be beating us. Honestly, I don't think we could have put together a defense even worse than the one we showed against the Danes.🤷
#33 ·
If we blow this, I just hope Goluža doesn't start whining about some massive judicial conspiracy again... he's honestly such a pathetic mess.😛😲
#34 ·
I honestly don't know how you guys see this goalie swap, because to me, it just doesn't make any sense. Even Šola admits that Alilović hasn't been in shape for six months and is basically out of commission for this tournament.
So then—get this—he leaves Alilović right where he is, but decides to bench Šega, who’s actually been pretty solid lately—aside from that mess against Denmark—and has been consistently great all season playing for the Washington, D.C. squad.
Instead, he puts Pešić in the lineup... who, by the way, is literally the second or third string keeper for that same Washington, D.C. team where Šega is the starter.
I mean, what is the point of the change if we aren't fixing the actual issue with Alilović? Or why ditch Šega when he actually did a decent job with the limited minutes he got? Is this just some weird psychological move to "wake up" Mirko, since he's still technically the number one option?🤷
So then—get this—he leaves Alilović right where he is, but decides to bench Šega, who’s actually been pretty solid lately—aside from that mess against Denmark—and has been consistently great all season playing for the Washington, D.C. squad.
Instead, he puts Pešić in the lineup... who, by the way, is literally the second or third string keeper for that same Washington, D.C. team where Šega is the starter.
I mean, what is the point of the change if we aren't fixing the actual issue with Alilović? Or why ditch Šega when he actually did a decent job with the limited minutes he got? Is this just some weird psychological move to "wake up" Mirko, since he's still technically the number one option?🤷
#35 ·
shadowranger522 said:I can't wrap my head around this goalkeeper shuffle; it feels completely illogical. Šola admitted Alilović hasn't been in shape for six months and isn't ready for this tournament.
Yet he keeps Alilović on the roster while cutting Šega—who was reliable everywhere except during the matchup against Denmark, despite being a consistent performer all season in Washington, D.C.
Then he brings in Pešić, who serves as the backup to the guy Šega replaced at Washington, D.C.
So what's the point of the swap if Alilović is the one actually struggling? Or why drop someone as steady as Šega given his limited minutes? Maybe it’s just a psychological play to "wake up" Mirko, since he’s still the starter. 🤷
I doubt it's that deep. It's probably just about Katie.☕
#37 ·
Adam Collins4 said:Mirko's defensive stats are actually better—that's why they kept him on the roster...
Does anyone know where I can find the full stats? All I could track down was a list of the top 20 goalies by save percentage, and—surprise, surprise—our guys aren't even on it.
edit: okay, found them...

#38 ·
Anthony Moore6 said:I don't want to rain on the parade, but this tournament is already a wash...
The mere fact that we’re starting off with just one point means we need three straight wins, some seriously bad luck from the Danes in their next three games (who aren't exactly going to hand up first place), and a massive stroke of luck that we don't run into the French in the semifinals if we end up finishing second in the group...
If we drop the game against Argentina, all of this goes right out the window. After that, we're basically relying on math and prayer just to scrape into second place and move on...
Why is it "lost"? If we pull off three wins, we're definitely in the semis, right?
#39 ·
If the Mexicans pull off all those wins, maybe we won't even 🤷
The math isn't really adding up for me, but someone over here was actually mentioning a potential solution.
The math isn't really adding up for me, but someone over here was actually mentioning a potential solution.
#40 ·
silentfalcon622 said:If the Mexicans win everything, maybe we won't even 🤷
The math isn't really adding up for me, but I saw someone mention a solution here.
Look, if the Mexicans win every single match, but the Danes manage at least one win and one draw, then the whole thing comes down to goal difference between us and them. That’s assuming we win all our games, too. But let's be real—the Mexicans aren't winning everything. I'll bet money on it.🙂
🔗 Similar threads
- The ethics of the "global expansion" era vs. real-world reality in Off-topic · Jul 30, 2026
- The unsung heroes of the wine world in Food & Drink · Jul 30, 2026
- Is a single "pillar" player too much of a risk for a championship run? in Fans · Jul 30, 2026
- The "Unsung Hero" factor in championship runs in Fans · Jul 30, 2026
- Why do we only see the "broken" parts of the world through our screens? in The World Around Us · Jul 30, 2026