CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Political spam everywhere

Political spam everywhere

Started by Bryan Edwards83 · · 👁 5 views · 7 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Bryan Edwards83Charles Fox10Gregory Ramirez2darkotter35velvetgull9
Bryan Edwards83 Bryan Edwards83 MemberOP
28 messages
joined May 2024
#1 ·
It feels like this one user is basically acting like a political manchild, constantly breaking the rules by just dropping copy-pasted articles without saying a single word about them. Today, they posted the exact same thing in both the Republican Party thread and the Democratic Coalition thread—just a straight copy-paste comparing their election promises. I guess it would be way more helpful if they just shared the link along with a quick summary or a personal take on what’s happening. This just feels like spam. Maybe you could give them a heads-up if this goes against the community guidelines?

Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Bryan Edwards83 Bryan Edwards83 MemberOP
28 messages
joined May 2024
#2 ·
I'll throw out some examples just to make it easier to judge.
The most recent one:
manchild said:"I don't think the minor parties will make it into Congress on their own. This feels like cautious maneuvering that might not actually work for the election results. Neither side seems to be counting on a clear win; instead, they’re gearing up for a coalition with the Libertarian Party. It's pretty clear the Republican Party is in a stronger spot here, and all of that depends on whether Bishop Košić's statement ends up blocking a coalition between the Libertarian Party and the Democratic Party. "", according to what Puhovski told BuzzFeed.

Also, regarding the stuff about the Republican Party, there are two posts in a row that are basically just copy-pasted snippets from the article:
post 3946
post 3947

I was wondering if the moderator thinks a post like this counts as spam or not?

Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#3 ·
What’s the issue here?

The PDF rules regarding Politics state this under Article 6:
Links aren't a substitute for actual content. When posting a link, you should include a brief description of what it covers (a title, a summary, or a key quote). It needs to be obvious why the page is relevant to the discussion.

My only concern would be that such posts might become unreadable. To help with clarity, we suggest putting the quote or headline inside a quote block. If we allowed posts consisting solely of links, threads would quickly turn into nothing but a chain of URLs, making them impossible to follow.

Posting the same thing in multiple threads is usually considered spam, though context matters—sometimes it actually makes sense. In my view, what you're doing isn't spam since it deals with the two major political parties within a single article; duplicating it like that isn't much of an issue. I might have structured it differently myself, but that's just my take.
Bryan Edwards83 Bryan Edwards83 MemberOP
28 messages
joined May 2024
#4 ·
Thanks for getting back to me! It just bugs me how people constantly drop full articles into threads without adding any actual commentary. I mean, imagine if we all started pasting entire stories word-for-word from every news site out there. Nobody does that, though—except for this one guy who used to get flagged for just posting links, so now he just copies the whole article instead. It’s not the end of the world, I guess, but I don't really see the point. This forum is supposed to be about sharing opinions and actually talking things through, and news clips should just be there to support that discussion. Posting entire articles feels a bit like spam to me, honestly.

It's totally fine if someone quotes a snippet from an interview to talk about it or something. But since these are such big topics, I feel like we should try to avoid those massive, unnecessary posts. It would probably make everything much easier to read for both the users and the moderators.

Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Gregory Ramirez2 Gregory Ramirez2 Active Member
72 messages
joined Aug 2012
#5 ·
You can toss anyone you want onto your Ignore list whenever you feel like it—once they're gone, their posts just vanish from your view across the entire forum.
It means you won't even notice if that person tries to tag you, drops a comment on one of your threads, or starts talking behind your back 😁
darkotter35 darkotter35 Active Member
57 messages
joined Jul 2018
#6 ·
Just ignore Blazeni.
Honestly, I don't even see half the people on this forum anymore, and frankly, it’s a much better experience without all the political trolls cluttering up the feed.
Just toss him on your ignore list and enjoy the peace and quiet.
velvetgull9 velvetgull9 Active Member
113 messages
joined Dec 2005
#7 ·
Bryan Edwards83 said:It feels like this one user is basically acting like a political manchild, constantly breaking the rules by just dropping copy-pasted articles without saying a single word about them. Today, they posted the exact same thing in both the Republican Party thread and the Democratic Coalition thread—just a straight copy-paste comparing their election promises. I guess it would be way more helpful if they just shared the link along with a quick summary or a personal take on what’s happening. This just feels like spam. Maybe you could give them a heads-up if this goes against the community guidelines?

Sent from my iPhone using Reddit

I don't know, I feel like just dropping a link isn't enough. A lot of links die after a few years, which makes old threads super hard to follow since you can't tell what everyone was actually talking about.

Also, signing every single post with "iPhone using Reddit" is basically spam too, IMO.
Bryan Edwards83 Bryan Edwards83 MemberOP
28 messages
joined May 2024
#8 ·
I love cats! They're just such wonderful little companions, aren't they? I guess they really do make a house feel like a home! kaže:
Just dropping a link isn't really enough, I guess. A lot of those links end up breaking after a few years anyway, which makes it super tough to follow old threads when you can't actually see what everyone was talking about!

And honestly, having that "Android user using Tapatalk" signature on every single post is just straight-up spam, I guess.


I get what you mean, but I mostly just felt like there wasn't really a need to post every single article that comes out on this topic. It's totally fine if there’s something to comment on regarding a specific piece, but if the moderators say it's okay, then I guess I'll respect that!

I didn't see anything in the rules about this being spam, so I guess if a moderator or admin gives me a heads-up, they could maybe ban me for good.

Android user using Tapatalk

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads