CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Hobbies & Leisure › Cycling › Obstacles on the tracks

Obstacles on the tracks

Started by Dennis Collins38 · · 👁 6 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dennis Collins38Jamie Palmerjadetiger962swiftbadger42Grace Lee48Kevin Rivera41electricraven11Morgan Martin38
Grace Lee48 Grace Lee48 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2009
#21 ·
There are plenty of reasons why they lack decent infrastructure, but let's be honest—in some cities outside of America, the bike lanes are nothing more than a single, narrow strip squeezed right next to the car lane.
Kevin Rivera41 Kevin Rivera41 Member
27 messages
joined Oct 2008
#22 ·
We’re just a shallow, lazy nation—I guess that explains why our transit system is such a mess. I always talk about doing it, but never actually get around to it (though at least we can mock it here)—I really should ride from the Warehouse District up through Main Street over to Držićev to snap ten ridiculous photos of bike lane obstacles. Not even mentioning those poorly designed speed bumps they slapped down later; they basically wreck your bike because you hit them way too fast since they're about 5cm higher than the rest of the pavement. Makes for one hell of a bumpy ride.
I also gotta mention some stuff that just leaves me confused. Since the laws are so "brilliant," you aren't allowed to cross a crosswalk unless there's a designated bike lane right there—so then you get these weird scenarios. Like, if there's no lane and just a standard crosswalk, obviously "by the book" you have to hop off and walk. Then there's the red-colored bike lanes that run right through a pedestrian crossing where you're good to go and have priority over cars. But then you've got a non-red lane that suddenly cuts out 5-6 meters before the crosswalk and restarts 5-6 meters after. So, "legally" speaking, you're stuck in this limbo where you have to dismount because you technically lose priority mid-crossing.
But then there are intersections where the non-red lane doesn't cut out early. They just run all the way to the street, even if they aren't marked on the road itself. If I remember right, the traffic lights still show a cyclist icon, so logically you should have priority, but I honestly don't get the whole red vs. non-red lane distinction!!??

What do you guys think??
electricraven11 electricraven11 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2010
#23 ·
So some jerk caught me off guard on this path that runs past the crosswalk—not even directly on the pedestrian part, mind you. And get this: the same idiot was letting pedestrians pass who were practically touching my front tire. Like, if someone is right in front of you, they aren't a driver, they're a pedestrian.
I honestly don't give a damn about "rules of the road" when some clown is waving me through just because he's being stubborn. I'm not looking for an accident just to prove a point. And if you feel the need to flex your authority at a crosswalk? Fine, but you just end up feeling like you're running a charity drive.

Didn't realize there was some kind of hierarchy for bike paths—I thought it was just about saving the paint job.🙂.
electricraven11 electricraven11 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2010
#24 ·
I’m still trying to wrap my head around the people who show up with a bucket of wet concrete just to pour a makeshift curb 😁??
Kevin Rivera41 Kevin Rivera41 Member
27 messages
joined Oct 2008
#25 ·
I’d bet my life over 90% of drivers don't even realize a cyclist has to actually dismount to have right-of-way at a standard crosswalk—if someone hit you, they either weren't looking or you just caught them off guard...

probably just some angry cyclist shaking their fist at a concrete barrier😁

the paths aren't officially ranked, but I have no clue why some are marked red and others aren't—though, honestly, the red ones definitely pop more
electricraven11 electricraven11 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2010
#26 ·
Nah, definitely an arrogant jerk, like I said—we actually made eye contact😁. Then, just as I’m getting up to grab my bike, they stop halfway across the damn crosswalk and start shouting through the window about how I won't make it across (as if the pedestrians wouldn't).
Kevin Rivera41 Kevin Rivera41 Member
27 messages
joined Oct 2008
#27 ·
Don't sweat it—he didn't think you had any kind of edge either. To guys like him, you're just another obstacle in the lane—just more background noise to those "alpha" types who think they own the road.
Morgan Martin38 Morgan Martin38 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jun 2006
#28 ·
poznanik;21087091According to the law said:

The red coloring simply marks the sections of the bike path where you're likely to come into contact with pedestrians.
For instance, at that bus stop over on Main Street in New York City, the red path stretches out quite a bit because it cuts right through the sidewalk area where people are waiting for about four different buses. In spots where there isn't any expected interaction with pedestrians, the bike lane is just marked with a standard yellow line.

So, look—if there's a crosswalk without a red strip, that isn't officially a bike lane; you're expected to get off your bike and walk it until the path (whether it's red or not)
starts up again.
If there is a red strip running across the crosswalk, then it counts as a bike lane, and you don't need to dismount to maintain your priority.

That’s exactly how my driving instructor explained it to me last year.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads