The philosophy of sacred space: Designing for the divine?

Man, I wish I could go on those trips too!!🙂

redmarlin3 said:....maybe....in the heat of the battle itself, we might stumble upon that rift in the heavens.... if we just peer deep, deep enough.... beneath the very surface of who we are....
....can we say for certain....that the laws we know still hold sway down there?....
....is randomness perhaps the only rule....governing that meta-space?....

Look, we can't possibly know for sure... because our tiny, blink-and-you'll-miss-it existence isn't nearly expansive enough to gather a statistically significant sample size of events occurring within that meta-space... there’s just no way to determine if things are happening by pure chance or if there's some underlying pattern at play... we're just as limited as the moderators on this forum here... unless we get promoted to super-mods, we aren't seeing the full picture, and honestly, we'd only see more if we were the admins... but then again, if everything really is just random luck... then there are no admins... and every single sphere of existence is just crawling with trolls and confused souls desperately fighting against entropy.

redmarlin3 said:Just spread your legs and you'll find it. ☕

This post has been reported to the moderator.

(who clearly has much more important things to attend to 🙄 )

redtinker36 said:.. I suspect our faith in science is pretty much absolute.. let's call it boundless..
.. and if there were a direct assault on that trust--and by extension, on us--it would just become a settled conviction that they have us completely by the throat..

Square Box divinity represents the ultimate perfection of
life and its accompanying patterns within the existing
universe and on Earth—including Earth
itself. Don't you see how a 4-cornered
rotating square, one fourth at a time, creates a complete
circle? A full shifted square will produce
16 angles, 96 hours, and 4 simultaneous
24-hour days within a single
invented Earth rotation. This
extends into a spiraling quad helix in
Earth as it orbits the Sun --
rotating as it revolves around the Sun,
leading to the conclusion that the Sun's value revolves
around the Earth. This act demonstrates
that the Sun and the Earth's rotation
are both happening simultaneously—thereby creating
Creation opposites that exist only as opposites with a
zero-value existence between binary
negations, proving nothing exists as a singular
God drinking tea. Everything occurs between Creation
opposites, existing solely as opposites --
with a zero point of existence. As a singular or
as a single Theism, all opposing values cancel
out to nothing. The circle you see around
Earth divides the Earth into opposing values
of equal zero existence. As a single God,
both Earth and humanity Abandon for nothing.
The entire universe consists of
opposites—with a zero existence--
so that nothing cancels out as a singular God.
People worship the identity of death,
effectively destroying the life of all
opposites through which all Creation exists. I
find Evil in the Bible, which will
shake the religious and academic values of their
primitive origins. No human or
God matches my Cube wisdom
as a Phenomenologist Cube - The Cube
measurer of God. While the Earth
rotation is a permanent embodiment, it
lacks the angular time notches required to
accumulate aging as life for the 4-cornered
inhabitants. Did you know that a 4-day
mentality rotates simultaneously on Earth?

steelsurfer33 said:Stop bullshitting me, steelsurfer42.

You can't just swap the goalposts while you're mid-sentence.

Simplification goes one way (upward), and complication goes the other (downward).

Your own signature points toward an upward trajectory. You can't suddenly claim the opposite direction just to argue that those "broader" laws in your signature are somehow more complicated.

Things aren't nearly as simple as you want—or think—they are.
That’s why you think I’m full of it.
Because your vision is blurry.

I’m talking about the actual direction science has taken and continues to take.
If you only want to play around with models, fine, you can claim generalities are simpler, but you can't ignore the fact that they're less accurate.

Look, if you poke a cow with a needle, it's going to jump. Sure, you could write a beautiful little law stating that needles always make cows move. But after you experiment on enough cows, they're eventually going to get sick of being poked and they'll charge you right through the... well, you know.
Then, by sheer necessity, you'll have to admit that a cow's behavior isn't quite that trivial when it comes to the needle. 😁

That's exactly what my signature is getting at.

What kind of nonsense are we even discussing here? 🍿

feralpilot0 said:What even is this nonsense 🍿

It's about the subject being talked about!

feralpilot0 said:What even is this nonsense about? 🍿

Honestly, if we actually managed to prove God exists and He decided to drop by this thread, He wouldn't have a clue what we're even talking about half the time anyway.🤣

feralpilot0 said:What kind of nonsense is this? 🍿

Someone clearly forgot to take their meds today. 😁

Aha 😁