CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › HPV vaccine info/discussion

HPV vaccine info/discussion

Started by Joshua Brooks8 · · 👁 5 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Joshua Brooks8Gerald Mendoza4dustyotter2Jerry Booth10Tyler Diaz4Casey Palmer5placidorca16
Joshua Brooks8 Joshua Brooks8 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Apr 2009
#1 ·
What are your thoughts on the HPV vaccinations being offered to young girls at schools across the US? In certain parts of the Midwest, the cost is sitting around 800-$333, but I’m wondering how the pricing looks in other states? Does anyone know if this is just some scheme to collect money, or is the vaccine actually beneficial? 🙏🙏🙏
Gerald Mendoza4 Gerald Mendoza4 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
Here's a link regarding the vaccine... I can't believe I'm even looking at this blog again... honestly, it's just more of the same nonsense. It’s like some people have zero interest in actually looking at the data coming out of the CDC and instead prefer to spin these wild, baseless theories about Gardasil. Every time I stumble onto these types of threads, my blood pressure just spikes—it's exhausting, really. The level of misinformation being pushed here is actually staggering. You see these people acting like they've uncovered some massive conspiracy, when in reality, they're just ignoring everything we know about public health and safety in the US. They take one tiny, misinterpreted detail and turn it into this huge, dramatic saga... it's just noise. Pure, unadulterated noise. And don't even get me started on the "experts" in these comment sections who act like they have more authority than actual medical professionals. They love to cite their own "research"—which usually consists of three Google searches and a gut feeling—as if that carries any weight in a serious discussion. It’s frustrating because you can’t win an argument with someone who isn't interested in facts, only in confirming what they already want to believe. Anyway, I'm probably just shouting into the void here. It feels like no matter how much evidence you lay out, some people will always find a way to twist it to fit their narrative. Just another day in the rabbit hole...

So, here’s the deal—this vaccine only covers four types of HPV, right? And there are way more than that out there... so if girls go out and get jabbed, they're basically only shielded from those specific four strains. They're still wide open to catching all the other ones... turns out it's not exactly the magic bullet everyone makes it out to be...
Look, personally? I'm against the whole vaccination thing... 🤷
dustyotter2 dustyotter2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2009
#3 ·
Jerry Booth10 Jerry Booth10 Member
36 messages
joined May 2008
#4 ·
This topic has already been covered extensively here on the forum, so you might want to dig through the archives and search for it.
Tyler Diaz4 Tyler Diaz4 Member
18 messages
joined Jun 2010
#5 ·
Is it standard practice to vaccinate young girls against STDs while they're still in the 7th grade?
Should we really be among the first to use our children as test subjects for a new vaccine?
Why isn't that massive budget being redirected toward prevention and education programs more suited to their age group?
What message are we sending by vaccinating a 14-year-old girl against sexually transmitted diseases?

I am firmly opposed to this.

An excerpt from a statement by the CDC; I personally find their experts far more competent than certain political structures here in the US.

"City initiatives to vaccinate girls who desire it (with parental consent) at specific ages, most commonly around the 7th grade, lack public health justification, as such significant funding yields minimal to no measurable public health impact."

@Sandra Martin72/">@@Sandra Martin72
The individual asked a question; the least one can do is provide an answer or a link where the answer might be found.
Joshua Brooks8 Joshua Brooks8 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Apr 2009
#6 ·
Thanks for the link and for sharing those perspectives... 🙏🙏🙏
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#7 ·
Given that kids these days are becoming sexually active as early as 15 or 16—yeah, it’s true—I really think it's time we start taking some kind of action. Is vaccination the right way to go? Honestly, I won't weigh in on that part; I don't feel like the public gets a fair look at both sides of the vaccine debate, and besides, I'm definitely not an expert... At the end of the day, the choice belongs to the parents, provided they take the time to get properly informed.
Tyler Diaz4 Tyler Diaz4 Member
18 messages
joined Jun 2010
#8 ·
Casey Palmer5 said:Given that kids are becoming sexually active as early as 15 or 16 these days—yes—it is a reasonable time for some sort of intervention. Whether vaccination itself is the right move is something I won't weigh in on; I don't think the public sees enough of both sides of the argument, nor am I an expert. Ultimately, the choice lies with the parents, provided they are sufficiently informed.

Can a parent truly make a sound decision when they are being bombarded by advertisements, conflicting guidance from two major public health agencies, and even contradictory opinions from their own doctors?
Is the priority actually administering vaccines, or should we be focusing on high-quality prevention regarding the transmission of all STDs?
The vaccine costs about $800$333. If that same amount per child were invested in comprehensive preventative measures within a city like Washington, D.C., I suspect we would see much better results.

Everyone is entitled to their own perspective.
placidorca16 placidorca16 Active Member
166 messages
joined Jan 2021
#9 ·
All I know is that the makers of Gardasil are tied up in all sorts of lawsuits here in the States over side effects. Definitely worth doing some digging first.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads