Is it standard practice to vaccinate young girls against STDs while they're still in the 7th grade?
Should we really be among the first to use our children as test subjects for a new vaccine?
Why isn't that massive budget being redirected toward prevention and education programs more suited to their age group?
What message are we sending by vaccinating a 14-year-old girl against sexually transmitted diseases?
I am firmly opposed to this.
An excerpt from a statement by the CDC; I personally find their experts far more competent than certain political structures here in the US.
"City initiatives to vaccinate girls who desire it (with parental consent) at specific ages, most commonly around the 7th grade, lack public health justification, as such significant funding yields minimal to no measurable public health impact."
@Sandra Martin72/">@
@Sandra Martin72
The individual asked a question; the least one can do is provide an answer or a link where the answer might be found.