CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Dictatorship in the Democratic Party

Dictatorship in the Democratic Party

Started by gentlegull93 · · 👁 4 views · 9 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants gentlegull93Harold Taylor6William Bennett53Charles Fox10Amanda Diaz
gentlegull93 gentlegull93 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Jan 2013
#1 ·
I’m asking you to please unlock the thread "anti-Mexican sentiment" because this isn't even political discourse like Harold Taylor6 claims, nor does it violate any rules within the Democratic Party sub-forum. Look, I can't police everything every single user says; I actually tried asking them what they were even talking about since it was irrelevant and warned them to stay Ontopic, but there's only so much I can do... It feels like I'm being punished here instead of the people actually derailing the conversation.
I read this move as just another attempt by the Democratic Party moderators to drive me—and all us old-school party loyalists—off this site entirely.
They’re shutting down threads with baseless accusations, giving no warnings and no chance to defend myself, which just forces me to keep coming back here over and over again. It’s just more proof of how those in power crush the little guy... There’s zero freedom of speech within the Democratic Party if you happen to be an eyesore to someone in charge. Honestly, it's no wonder everyone with half a brain moved over to Offtopic to start their own discussions, leaving the Democratic Party section to these people who basically helped the mods lock my thread. Who knows, maybe that user deni__ is actually a clone of Deedy's, or maybe Bearded bastard Cukin and Harold Taylor6 are working together to sabotage me on purpose... There are just too many unanswered questions and suspicions.

Also, based on what I've dealt with before, I’m asking that you please let me explain my side before you make any moves or decide to shut down a discussion like this.
Harold Taylor6 Harold Taylor6 Member
34 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
gentlegull93 said:I’m asking you to please unlock the thread "anti-Mexican sentiment" because this isn't even political discourse like Harold Taylor6 claims, nor does it violate any rules within the Democratic Party sub-forum. Look, I can't police everything every single user says; I actually tried asking them what they were even talking about since it was irrelevant and warned them to stay Ontopic, but there's only so much I can do... It feels like I'm being punished here instead of the people actually derailing the conversation.
I read this move as just another attempt by the Democratic Party moderators to drive me—and all us old-school party loyalists—off this site entirely.
They’re shutting down threads with baseless accusations, giving no warnings and no chance to defend myself, which just forces me to keep coming back here over and over again. It’s just more proof of how those in power crush the little guy... There’s zero freedom of speech within the Democratic Party if you happen to be an eyesore to someone in charge. Honestly, it's no wonder everyone with half a brain moved over to Offtopic to start their own discussions, leaving the Democratic Party section to these people who basically helped the mods lock my thread. Who knows, maybe that user deni__ is actually a clone of Deedy's, or maybe Bearded bastard Cukin and Harold Taylor6 are working together to sabotage me on purpose... There are just too many unanswered questions and suspicions.

Also, based on what I've dealt with before, I’m asking that you please let me explain my side before you make any moves or decide to shut down a discussion like this.

Look, even though I don't think that was the intention behind the thread, people managed to dump so much nonsense into it within just an hour or two that, unfortunately, it spiraled out of control. Once things go south that fast, there isn't a single moderator or admin out there who can reel it back in.

I honestly can't control what certain users decide to type. I asked them what they were even talking about since it wasn't the topic at hand, and I warned them to stay on topic, but that's really where my influence ends. As it stands, I'm actually the one being penalized here instead of the people actually derailing the discussion.

So, please, don't point the finger at me—point it at the people actually writing those posts! It isn't fair to shift the blame onto the mods, in this case, myself, every time things go sideways. You're clearly just collateral damage here, though I'm not quite sure why you're framing yourself that way.

To me, that move felt like just another attempt by the Democratic Party moderators to push me—along with all the other veteran members—off the forum.
They lock threads with baseless accusations, giving us zero right to defend ourselves or even get a warning. It's just another example of how the powers that be trample over the little guy. In the Democratic Party section, there's no such thing as a voice if you happen to be an eyesore to someone in charge. It's no wonder everyone with half a brain moved over to Offtopic to start their own discussions, leaving the Democratic Party space to be filled by these people who basically helped the mods shut me down. Who knows? Maybe user deni__ is actually a Deedy's clone, or maybe Bearded bastard Cukin and Harold Taylor6 are intentionally sabotaging me in some grand conspiracy. There's just too much ambiguity and suspicion for me.

You need to make up your mind, because you're giving me totally conflicting views here. Now, think about it carefully: is the fault lying with the massive wave of 49 posts that turned into political spam and mindless chatter, or is it part of some massive conspiracy to drive you (or whoever you represent) away from the Democratic Party?
Me, starting the thread? Why on earth would I be an eyesore to you? And why do you think anyone is targeting me? Honestly, I have much more important things going on in my life than obsessing over conspiracies or trying to kick people out... Are you really that bored? Do you seriously think I'm just sitting here by my computer waiting for a chance to punish someone? If we actually had an agenda to kick people out—and trust me, I don't—we wouldn't be handing out 365 new chances to everyone.
I'd also ask that, based on past experiences, before you take any action or decide to lock this debate, you at least allow me to respond.

Go right ahead...
gentlegull93 gentlegull93 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Jan 2013
#3 ·
Harold Taylor6 said:Look, even though I don't think that was the intention behind the thread, people managed to dump so much nonsense into it within just an hour or two that, unfortunately, it spiraled out of control. Once things go south that fast, there isn't a single moderator or admin out there who can reel it back in.

I honestly can't control what certain users decide to type. I asked them what they were even talking about since it wasn't the topic at hand, and I warned them to stay on topic, but that's really where my influence ends. As it stands, I'm actually the one being penalized here instead of the people actually derailing the discussion.

So, please, don't point the finger at me—point it at the people actually writing those posts! It isn't fair to shift the blame onto the mods, in this case, myself, every time things go sideways. You're clearly just collateral damage here, though I'm not quite sure why you're framing yourself that way.

To me, that move felt like just another attempt by the Democratic Party moderators to push me—along with all the other veteran members—off the forum.
They lock threads with baseless accusations, giving us zero right to defend ourselves or even get a warning. It's just another example of how the powers that be trample over the little guy. In the Democratic Party section, there's no such thing as a voice if you happen to be an eyesore to someone in charge. It's no wonder everyone with half a brain moved over to Offtopic to start their own discussions, leaving the Democratic Party space to be filled by these people who basically helped the mods shut me down. Who knows? Maybe user deni__ is actually a Deedy's clone, or maybe Bearded bastard Cukin and Harold Taylor6 are intentionally sabotaging me in some grand conspiracy. There's just too much ambiguity and suspicion for me.

You need to make up your mind, because you're giving me totally conflicting views here. Now, think about it carefully: is the fault lying with the massive wave of 49 posts that turned into political spam and mindless chatter, or is it part of some massive conspiracy to drive you (or whoever you represent) away from the Democratic Party?
Me, starting the thread? Why on earth would I be an eyesore to you? And why do you think anyone is targeting me? Honestly, I have much more important things going on in my life than obsessing over conspiracies or trying to kick people out... Are you really that bored? Do you seriously think I'm just sitting here by my computer waiting for a chance to punish someone? If we actually had an agenda to kick people out—and trust me, I don't—we wouldn't be handing out 365 new chances to everyone.
I'd also ask that, based on past experiences, before you take any action or decide to lock this debate, you at least allow me to respond.

Go right ahead...

I spent my entire time trying to keep this discussion going, I even lost my temper and insulted a user named Danny—told him he was sick, which I actually apologized for later because I felt bad—but you were supposed to be here to protect me and this perfectly valid thread from those two trolls who were clearly just looking to bury it, yet instead, you punished me by deleting everything and wiping out all my effort...

Harold Taylor6 said:Look, even though I don't think that was the intention behind the thread, people managed to dump so much nonsense into it within just an hour or two that, unfortunately, it spiraled out of control. Once things go south that fast, there isn't a single moderator or admin out there who can reel it back in.

I honestly can't control what certain users decide to type. I asked them what they were even talking about since it wasn't the topic at hand, and I warned them to stay on topic, but that's really where my influence ends. As it stands, I'm actually the one being penalized here instead of the people actually derailing the discussion.

So, please, don't point the finger at me—point it at the people actually writing those posts! It isn't fair to shift the blame onto the mods, in this case, myself, every time things go sideways. You're clearly just collateral damage here, though I'm not quite sure why you're framing yourself that way.

To me, that move felt like just another attempt by the Democratic Party moderators to push me—along with all the other veteran members—off the forum.
They lock threads with baseless accusations, giving us zero right to defend ourselves or even get a warning. It's just another example of how the powers that be trample over the little guy. In the Democratic Party section, there's no such thing as a voice if you happen to be an eyesore to someone in charge. It's no wonder everyone with half a brain moved over to Offtopic to start their own discussions, leaving the Democratic Party space to be filled by these people who basically helped the mods shut me down. Who knows? Maybe user deni__ is actually a Deedy's clone, or maybe Bearded bastard Cukin and Harold Taylor6 are intentionally sabotaging me in some grand conspiracy. There's just too much ambiguity and suspicion for me.

You need to make up your mind, because you're giving me totally conflicting views here. Now, think about it carefully: is the fault lying with the massive wave of 49 posts that turned into political spam and mindless chatter, or is it part of some massive conspiracy to drive you (or whoever you represent) away from the Democratic Party?
Me, starting the thread? Why on earth would I be an eyesore to you? And why do you think anyone is targeting me? Honestly, I have much more important things going on in my life than obsessing over conspiracies or trying to kick people out... Are you really that bored? Do you seriously think I'm just sitting here by my computer waiting for a chance to punish someone? If we actually had an agenda to kick people out—and trust me, I don't—we wouldn't be handing out 365 new chances to everyone.
I'd also ask that, based on past experiences, before you take any action or decide to lock this debate, you at least allow me to respond.

Go right ahead...

It's not about you writing nonsense to me, it's about the fact that you decided to punish me instead of just protecting the thread from their posts if you thought they weren't following the spirit of the Democratic Party...
Based on how you're acting right now, refusing to admit you messed up, it feels like anyone can start a thread about a band or whatever, and then if I don't like the vibe, I can just jump in and spout political nonsense that has nothing to do with the topic, and we'll just wait to see if the thread gets nuked, stays open despite my rambling, or if I get a strike and lose all my posts, and it seems to me like I'm the only person who ends up getting silenced just because someone else—including the mods—acted stupidly...

Harold Taylor6 said:Look, even though I don't think that was the intention behind the thread, people managed to dump so much nonsense into it within just an hour or two that, unfortunately, it spiraled out of control. Once things go south that fast, there isn't a single moderator or admin out there who can reel it back in.

I honestly can't control what certain users decide to type. I asked them what they were even talking about since it wasn't the topic at hand, and I warned them to stay on topic, but that's really where my influence ends. As it stands, I'm actually the one being penalized here instead of the people actually derailing the discussion.

So, please, don't point the finger at me—point it at the people actually writing those posts! It isn't fair to shift the blame onto the mods, in this case, myself, every time things go sideways. You're clearly just collateral damage here, though I'm not quite sure why you're framing yourself that way.

To me, that move felt like just another attempt by the Democratic Party moderators to push me—along with all the other veteran members—off the forum.
They lock threads with baseless accusations, giving us zero right to defend ourselves or even get a warning. It's just another example of how the powers that be trample over the little guy. In the Democratic Party section, there's no such thing as a voice if you happen to be an eyesore to someone in charge. It's no wonder everyone with half a brain moved over to Offtopic to start their own discussions, leaving the Democratic Party space to be filled by these people who basically helped the mods shut me down. Who knows? Maybe user deni__ is actually a Deedy's clone, or maybe Bearded bastard Cukin and Harold Taylor6 are intentionally sabotaging me in some grand conspiracy. There's just too much ambiguity and suspicion for me.

You need to make up your mind, because you're giving me totally conflicting views here. Now, think about it carefully: is the fault lying with the massive wave of 49 posts that turned into political spam and mindless chatter, or is it part of some massive conspiracy to drive you (or whoever you represent) away from the Democratic Party?
Me, starting the thread? Why on earth would I be an eyesore to you? And why do you think anyone is targeting me? Honestly, I have much more important things going on in my life than obsessing over conspiracies or trying to kick people out... Are you really that bored? Do you seriously think I'm just sitting here by my computer waiting for a chance to punish someone? If we actually had an agenda to kick people out—and trust me, I don't—we wouldn't be handing out 365 new chances to everyone.
I'd also ask that, based on past experiences, before you take any action or decide to lock this debate, you at least allow me to respond.

Go right ahead...

I asked you nicely and you read it, yet I see the thread has been deleted anyway...

I want a public apology for what you did, because you've made me feel like a second-class member of this community, and frankly, I'm pretty disappointed... 😢
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#4 ·
gentlegull93, while it is certainly pleasant to see such witty and inspired contributors within the Democratic Party and on this forum in general, I must point out that this specific thread is not the Democratic Party. Moving forward, we request a brief, clear, and serious approach. Continuing in the tone expressed above is simply not acceptable.
gentlegull93 gentlegull93 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Jan 2013
#5 ·
It’s such a shame that there aren't any witty or high-quality posters left on the Democratic Party boards anymore... anyone worth their salt either migrated to different subforums or just quit the site entirely. If you really want to know why, just ask me...
And if you weren't just trolling me and actually get where I'm coming from, then give me my thread back.
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#6 ·
I deleted it because the thread veered into territory we have zero tolerance for, and you know how it is. Your initial idea might have been fine, but from the title onwards, those posts were headed straight for a ban.
gentlegull93 gentlegull93 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Jan 2013
#7 ·
Charles Fox10, if I actually sat here and answered you, I’d start feeling like a damn parrot just repeating myself over and over again... I’m not about to go back to square one every single time some new moderator shows up on the scene...
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#8 ·
No need for further explanation; I hear you loud and clear, and I hope you realize that we on the Democratic Party moderation team feel the same way.
It isn't personal. It’s just that politics is for the losers, whereas the Democratic Party is meant for much simpler conversations.
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#9 ·
I have a question for the admins. We all saw how things were handled over at the Democratic Party section—threads get nuked the second users start posting anything with a political slant. Does that rule apply to the entire forum, or is it strictly limited to the Democratic Party section? For instance, if someone starts a thread about recipes and I jump in to start a political debate, will my specific posts be flagged and deleted, or does the whole thread get wiped out?

Thanks in advance for clarifying. I just want to make sure this forum stays a decent place for everyone to post.
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#10 ·
Amanda Diaz, there really isn't such a thing as a set of universal rules for these matters. Each sub-forum functions as its own little ecosystem, complete with its own unique discourse, internal logic, and specific sense of humor. Universal rules are generally reserved for the overarching site policy—things like prohibiting personal attacks or preventing discrimination based on race, gender, or religion... and, of course, the standard guidelines regarding moderator interactions.

So, perhaps you should direct your inquiry to the Food & Drink board.
I believe we have exhausted this particular topic.
My thanks to everyone.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads