CheckEmoji Community ยท the emoji forum
๐Ÿ  Home ๐Ÿ†• What's new โ“ Unanswered ๐Ÿ”ฅ Popular ๐Ÿ“ก RSS Members ๐Ÿ‘ฅ 0 online log in ยท register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Shoot 'em Up

Shoot 'em Up

Started by Grace Doyle · · ๐Ÿ‘ 7 views · 53 replies

๐Ÿ“ก Subscribe to replies

Participants Grace DoyleJerry Alvarez70David Price5feralorca82Matthew Brooks5Sarah Lopez6Walter Fowler53John Peterson3Jason Jones2Raymond Palmer8lonestag97redwalker6mellowsailor11Michael Rivera63mistyangler58Bradley Alvarez36darkcobra29Chloe Harris77analogbisonBrenda Robinson6Steven Cook7Sean Patel4Sandra Leecasualranger10 โ€ฆ
darkcobra29 darkcobra29 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2008
#21 ·
But honestly, the best part? His fingers are totally busted so he canโ€™t even grip his gun. Instead, he just lets the bullets slip through his fingers, shoves his hand right into the fire, and somehow hits the bad guy with insane precision. Absolute legend.
Chloe Harris77 Chloe Harris77 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2015
#22 ·
Honestly, I think they totally botched the title. It probably should have been called "The Killing of a Mockingbird." This movie is just pure chill vibes.
analogbison analogbison Member
13 messages
joined Jan 2008
#23 ·
You can say whatever you like, but if you ask me, this movie was absolutely fantastic. Itโ€™s the perfect way to unwindโ€”it hits that sweet spot where there is just enough comedy balanced perfectly with the action. Honestly, Iโ€™d much rather sit down to something like this than some pretentious Hollywood blockbuster that tries way too hard to be "deep" or intellectually profound while completely neglecting the excitement. I remember trying to sit through those horror flicks like Insect or Spooky Swamp, and they were such absolute garbage that I could barely make it to the credits. This? This was pure entertainment.
Brenda Robinson6 Brenda Robinson6 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2007
#24 ·
I think itโ€™s just plain stupid to kill off 200 people just to make a point about one kid.๐Ÿ˜‚
Honestly, who's actually losing their mind here?๐Ÿคฃ
Steven Cook7 Steven Cook7 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jan 2008
#25 ·
...90 minutes of pure, unadulterated nonsenseโ€”just bullets, meat, blood, and then some more blood...
...relaxing and absolutely fantastic... ๐Ÿ‘
Sean Patel4 Sean Patel4 Member
14 messages
joined May 2009
#26 ·
The sequence where Bed Guy hides behind a counter, preventing Clive from landing a shot, is truly absurd. He ends up shooting his companion instead, who collapses to the floor, only for him to fire again at the man's handโ€”which happens to be pointing right back at the idiot hiding behind the counter. Then, he shoots the companion's hand yet again, causing a reflexive shot to go off toward the guy behind the counter. Itโ€™s absolutely mind-blowing, truly unprecedented filmmaking. ๐Ÿ˜
Sarah Lopez6 Sarah Lopez6 Member
38 messages
joined Mar 2007
#27 ·
Sean Patel4 said:So there's this scene where Bed Guy hides behind a counter and Clive can't hit him, so he shoots his buddy instead. The buddy hits the floor, then gets shot again in the hand which is now pointing right at Bed Guy behind the counter, and then the guy actually shoots his buddy's hand, causing a reflex shot that finally nails the derp hiding behind the counter. Unbelievable. Never seen anything like it!!! ๐Ÿ˜

plus The Killing of a Mockingbird ๐Ÿ˜
Sandra Lee Sandra Lee Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jul 2007
#28 ·
Owen is generally the man, especially after seeing him in Closer, but I feel like heโ€™s kind of coasting with this role. I get that everyone is making these gritty, non-scripted indie flicks nowadays, but does he really have to...? Monica Bellucci is also incredible, but honestly, why does she keep taking these roles where she plays the femme fatale? It's like those two roles weren't enough for her. The movie itself is total garbage (aside from the special effects, but hey, every recent movie has decent CGI). I just hope Owen doesn't sign on for another project like this, otherwise, he's going to be a washed-up actor real fast.
Sarah Lopez6 Sarah Lopez6 Member
38 messages
joined Mar 2007
#29 ·
lol, just rewatched this movie last night and popped it back on with the crew. booze + shots + Shoot Em up = absolute chaos
pure screaming fun and constant messing aroundโ€”takes the movie to a whole different level

plus we polished off about two pounds of carrots along the way๐Ÿ˜‚
Jason Jones2 Jason Jones2 Member
32 messages
joined Feb 2009
#30 ·
Michael Jackson62 said:lol, I actually recorded this movie yesterday and took it back to watch with the crew. Alcohol plus some booze plus Shoot 'Em Up equals absolute chaos.
Pure, screaming fun and non-stop messing aroundโ€”it puts the movie on a whole different level.

And we polished off about two pounds of carrots along the way.๐Ÿ˜‚

Nekoc once told us that Kung Pow served as our go-to recommendation too.
There's a chance Shoot 'Em Up could become just as much of a cult classic.
The kind of movie that gets watched more often by everyone in a year than all the Oscar winners combined.๐Ÿ˜
casualranger10 casualranger10 Member
18 messages
joined Jan 2010
#31 ·
Honestly, I was just physically nauseated by how much this movie drags and overstays its welcome. For about half the runtime, I found myself constantly questioning the logic of what was happening on screenโ€”it was just so grating. Even a game like Max Payne feels more grounded in reality than this mess. I ended up powering through the second half with a completely checked-out mindset, treating it like total brain candy, and somehow it felt slightly less painful. Ultimately, this flick was clearly designed for people who want to turn their brains off entirely and just zone out.
Matthew Miller38 Matthew Miller38 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Oct 2007
#32 ·
The movie is kind of hilariousโ€”youโ€™ve got this guy driving around and just killing people with The Killing of a Mockingbird, but somehow itโ€™s still interesting in its own weird way. Honestly though, our guy Clive is actually more capable than Rambo, Chuck, Bruce Lee, Terminator, Batman, and the rest of them.
dustyjackal4 dustyjackal4 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Feb 2009
#33 ·
I actually caught this movie yesterday, and honestly, it was great. I haven't seen this much shooting, trashiness, The Killing of a Mockingbird (if you've watched it, you'll get what I mean), and incredibly convoluted plots in a long time. The ninety minutes flew by, though. Itโ€™s definitely a film meant for just relaxing without overthinking anything.
Granted, the cast is top-tier: Clive Owen, Monica Bellucci, and Paul Giamatti. I'd recommend it to anyone looking to just unwind.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465602/
dustymoose70 dustymoose70 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Feb 2009
#34 ·
This movie is absolutely insane... I actually sat through it twice in a single day and loved every second of both viewings. Itโ€™s pure, unapologetic chaosโ€”and honestly, thatโ€™s why it works so well. We need more films like this where you can just switch your brain off and relax, right? Iโ€™d give it four stars for ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™ and five stars for ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™ Monica. The wildest part has to be when sheโ€™s driving that BMW and takes care of business on the guy in the Mercedesโ€”total carnage immediately after
Richard Chavez5 Richard Chavez5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2008
#35 ·
It's decent trash, but I've seen much harder hitters.
Edward Hernandez45 Edward Hernandez45 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jul 2008
#36 ·
While this movie might not be the latest release on the block, I finally sat down to give it a watch recently.

It is pure, unadulterated grindhouse cinema, filmed with a genuine passion for the genre.

The acting is truly top-tier, starting with Owen and Monica, but I must say, Paul Giamatti is particularly standout; he delivers such a magnificent performance as the villain.

In my estimation, this is an absolutely superb feature for anyone who finds joy in the world of cult trash films.

If one considers the standard set by Planet Terror, this might just be the finest piece of trash cinema we have seen in years.๐Ÿ˜

(Of course, that assumes you are someone who possesses a deep appreciation for actors and practical effects.)
driftingcanyon22 driftingcanyon22 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jul 2008
#37 ·
I'm right there with Edward Hernandez45 on this one; it's been a long time since I sat down for a movie this much fun (not counting Planet Terror, obviously ๐Ÿ˜)
Anthony Smith3 Anthony Smith3 Regular
511 messages
joined May 2009
#38 ·
driftingcanyon22 said:Exactly what Edward Hernandez45 was saying. Honestly, itโ€™s been a minute since I watched something this much fun (not counting Planet Terror, obviously ๐Ÿ˜)


Go watch "Wanted" then... it's basically the same vibe but 100% better, more original, and way more entertaining. ๐Ÿ‘Personally, Shoot 'Em Up was a total letdown for me...
David Price5 David Price5 Regular
435 messages
joined Jul 2012
#39 ·
Anthony Smith3 said:I found Shoot 'Em Up to be quite disappointing personally...

Which parts specifically?
Anthony Smith3 Anthony Smith3 Regular
511 messages
joined May 2009
#40 ·
David Price5 said:Which parts?

The whole damn movie... look, I was hyped for this, and I'm usually pretty chill with these kinds of flicks, so you can't claim I was expecting some deep masterpiece or that I didn't get the jokes. I've got a long-winded review coming where I break it all down... just waiting to drop it on the forum or over on Rotten Tomatoes...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

๐Ÿ”— Similar threads