CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Is this tap water carcinogenic?

Is this tap water carcinogenic?

Started by steeleagle13 · · 👁 5 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants steeleagle13feralwolf24Timothy Morgan38Grace Fisher31
steeleagle13 steeleagle13 Active MemberOP
95 messages
joined Sep 2008
#1 ·
So I'm just sitting here looking at the news, and apparently they found some carcinogenic mineral oil in the water supply over in that small town—I tried to stay quiet about it, but honestly, how is that even possible? Where the hell does mineral oil even come from in a municipal water system?

It’s weird to me because people are saying it’s linked to the plumbing in those new developments in that small town... since it’s specifically happening in those brand-new buildings.
feralwolf24 feralwolf24 Member
26 messages
joined Aug 2009
#2 ·
Instead of using the standard galvanized pipes you'd normally expect—which actually costs contractors more upfront—they grabbed some cheap stock from a warehouse that was basically tempered with high heat and oil cooling. To make matters worse, some "genius" decided to swoop in with a one-size-fits-all fix, claiming chlorine solves everything. It’s like they thought chlorinating the water would somehow fix the issues caused by the mineral oils. Honestly, what a joke. Even someone who knows nothing about this stuff could see how ridiculous that logic is, let alone someone trying to be clever with such a bad joke.
The solution? Pay people damages for being without water for an entire year, cover any health risks from trihalomethane exposure caused by the chlorination (since they messed up the shower water too), and replace all those pipes at their own expense. Oh, and don't forget to compensate everyone for the downtime, the constant noise, the dust, and the general mess. If I were the Mayor, I wouldn't dream of cutting corners on such shady business. I certainly wouldn't install something like this in my own house.
steeleagle13 steeleagle13 Active MemberOP
95 messages
joined Sep 2008
#3 ·
feralwolf24 said:Instead of using the standard galvanized pipes—which actually cost the contractors money—they grabbed some junk from a warehouse that’s been warped by high heat and oil cooling. Then, because someone thinks they’re a genius, they pushed this "one size fits all" solution. As if chlorine fixes everything? Or as if chlorine isn't also the root of the problem. They actually thought solving mineral oil contamination by chlorinating the water was a bright idea. My god, what kind of nonsense is that? Even a layman would see through that joke, let alone someone who thought they were being clever with such a ridiculous "fix."
The fix? Pay people damages for being without water for a year, compensate them for the potential health risks from trihalomethanes caused by the chlorination (since they messed up the shower water too), and replace the damn pipes at their own expense. Oh, and don't forget to pay everyone for the downtime during repairs, plus the noise, the dust, and the total mess. Honestly, if I were Mayor, I wouldn't dream of cutting corners on such a shady job. You certainly wouldn't install this garbage in your own house!!

From what I know, they use iron pipes inside walls, but where there's a main line, they use thicker plastic ones.

I just don't get how such a tiny amount of mineral oil can be dangerous if you're just SHOWERING, not drinking the stuff?

So this is just an issue with that new development over by the suburbs: who knows what kind of pipes they're burying between buildings or in the main lines? If I remember right, it's all plastic there too.
Timothy Morgan38 Timothy Morgan38 Active Member
177 messages
joined Mar 2010
#4 ·
steeleagle13 said:As far as I know, they use iron pipes for the water inside the walls, but where the main lines are, they use thicker plastic ones

I just don't get how such a tiny amount of mineral oils could be harmful if you're just showering and not actually drinking the water...??

So, it's really just an issue with these new suburban developments... though who knows what kind of piping they're burying between buildings or in the main lines. If I recall correctly, it’s all plastic there too

I caught a bit of what that expert was saying... something about how showering isn't the danger, but rather if the water gets into your system through your nose or mouth while you're washing...

Now, I wasn't exactly hanging on his every word—more like listening in passing—but that actually makes sense to me...
Grace Fisher31 Grace Fisher31 Member
18 messages
joined Oct 2006
#5 ·
Generally speaking, you shouldn't drink the water at a new construction site for at least a week after it's finished.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads