CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › TIME Magazine's list of the 100 greatest movies ever

TIME Magazine's list of the 100 greatest movies ever

Started by Carol Rodriguez3 · · 👁 5 views · 21 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Carol Rodriguez3Sandra King86Jose Miller17Larry Cruz51gentlejackal16Sophia Brown78Douglas Phillips4analogharbor442Jeremy Flores10nimblemarlin17Jessica Nguyen85northerncrane4quietmaker44Tyler Stewart26Jonathan Campbell5stormyviper11Maria Kelly6urbanhawk28Jeremy Bishop5
Carol Rodriguez3 Carol Rodriguez3 MemberOP
26 messages
joined Mar 2005
#1 ·
The latest issue of TIME Magazine features a list of the greatest films ever made, curated by critics Richard Schickel and Richard Corliss.

The lineup includes the usual heavyweights like Citizen Kane, Casablanca, and Lawrence of Arabia, along with modern hits such as Raiders of the Lost Ark and Jerusalem. Surprisingly, they left out staples like Annie Hall, Apocalypse Now, and the Italian Neorealist classic Bicycle Thieves.

The authors clearly know they’re inviting backlash, but they don't seem to care. It's their list, not some absolute truth, and taste is always subjective anyway.
From the more recent era, you'll find Pedro Almodóvar's Talk to Her, The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and Pulp Fiction.

Martin Scorsese takes the top spot for directors with three entries, while Robert De Niro leads the actors with five films making the cut. In the same issue, Schickel and Corliss also picked the best films by decade: Fritz Lang's Metropolis for the 20s, William Wyler's Dodsworth for the 30s, and Orson Welles' Citizen Kane for the 40s.

The 50s were defined by Akira Kurosawa's Ikiru, the 60s by Ingmar Bergman's Persona, and the 70s by Roman Polanski's Chinatown—a film Schickel admits he misjudged upon release, now calling it nearly perfect.

For the 80s, they chose Krzysztof Kieślowski's Dekalog, the 90s belonged to Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction, and for the current decade, the winner is Pedro Almodóvar's Talk to Her.

What's your take on these decade picks?
Sandra King86 Sandra King86 Active Member
79 messages
joined Sep 2004
#2 ·
A list without Apocalypse Now? 😲
😲 😲 😲

Total amateurs! 🙂
What even is VIP? Some kind of joke group? :2up:

☕

😁
Jose Miller17 Jose Miller17 Active Member
162 messages
joined Sep 2003
#3 ·
VIP is just our portal that picked up the news 🙂 ;-) ..just because it's true doesn't mean they aren't a total group of sissies 😁😁
Sandra King86 Sandra King86 Active Member
79 messages
joined Sep 2004
#4 ·
So... 😲

:2up:
Larry Cruz51 Larry Cruz51 Active Member
120 messages
joined Jun 2008
#5 ·
Edward Howard39 said:http://www.vip.us/
?

You could have at least provided it... The actual link... 😉

a It seems we have reached an impasse... or perhaps just a momentary pause in our conversation. I shall wait here, poised and ready, for whenever you decide to continue this dialogue... And here is the complete list...

People seem to act like they're missing out on the essentials... as if classics like The Shawshank Redemption, Gone with the Wind, or even Timmy just don't exist anymore...

Well, honestly, you can all just go to hell... I'm here... ready when you are. 😁
gentlejackal16 gentlejackal16 Member
11 messages
joined Jan 2006
#6 ·
What a bunch of characters!!!!!!

🙂
Sophia Brown78 Sophia Brown78 Member
22 messages
joined Dec 2004
#7 ·
As long as they keep Star Wars on the list, I’m totally cool with it 😁
Douglas Phillips4 Douglas Phillips4 Active Member
70 messages
joined Apr 2003
#8 ·
Edward Howard39 said:Among more recent releases, we have Pedro Almodóvar's "Talk to Her," "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, and "Pulp Fiction."

Off-topic: I find it interesting how whenever "Talk to Her" comes up, you always feel the need to include the director's name. Meanwhile, titles like "Pulp Fiction" or "The Lord of the Rings" stand perfectly fine on their own. It’s almost as if the title itself isn't quite as iconic as the name of a legendary director.🤔 🙄 ☕
analogharbor442 analogharbor442 Member
13 messages
joined Nov 2006
#9 ·
I’m pretty much on board with almost every decade listed... except maybe the '30s—I’d probably throw in "Sunrise" or "The Rules of the Game" there. As for the '70s, I can't quite decide. Should it be "Chinatown," maybe "The Godfather," "Solaris," or even "A Clockwork Orange"? There were just way too many masterpieces in the '70s!
As for the '80s, the selection actually caught me by surprise in the best way, and I totally agree with it... regarding the current decade... well, I don't know yet. It isn't over yet, after all...
analogharbor442 analogharbor442 Member
13 messages
joined Nov 2006
#10 ·
Laura Roberts61 said:People keep acting like they’re missing out on the essentials—you know, classics like *The Shawshank Redemption*, *Gone with the Wind*, or even *Timmy*.

Look, the reason is simple: they aren't exactly masterpieces. They’re very solid, sure—but they're overrated. Take *The Shawshank Redemption*, for example. It’s a decent, conventional drama with a compelling story, but that’s really where the praise ends. Nothing more, nothing less.
Jeremy Flores10 Jeremy Flores10 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2010
#11 ·
I honestly can't believe Amadeus by Miloš Forman isn't on there!!!
Just my personal take, but it's easily the best 🙏 🙏
Seriously, what kind of idiots put this list together?
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#12 ·
Look, this is a list of the 100 most important films, not necessarily the best ones. You aren't going to please everyone.
Jessica Nguyen85 Jessica Nguyen85 Active Member
162 messages
joined Jul 2003
#13 ·
On the bright side... we finally have Dekalog.

Not exactly... I see Finding Nemo and Star Wars on the list, but The Matrix is nowhere to be found. 😵 I don't see anything from David Lynch, Jim Jarmusch, or Tim Burton...
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#14 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:The list is about the 100 most important films, not necessarily the best ones.

Important for what purpose?
That’s my favorite move—when they don't have the guts to say "best," so they resort to these vague qualifiers like "most important," "most impactful," or "most significant."
quietmaker44 quietmaker44 Member
42 messages
joined Oct 2011
#15 ·
northerncrane4 said:Most important for what exactly?
That’s my favorite part—when they don't have the guts to actually say "the best," so they scramble for these vague synonyms like "most impactful," "most significant," or whatever other nonsense they can cook up.

Across all Western media, there's this obsessive craze for these "Top 100" or "Top 10" lists using those "most this" or "most that" labels. Honestly, nobody sane takes these fancy-pants lists seriously anymore. At most, they're just a vague snapshot of opinion, nothing more.
So, I don't even see the point in commenting on this TIME Magazine list, because if I actually started... well, you know.
Jeremy Flores10 Jeremy Flores10 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2010
#16 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:The list covers the 100 most essential films, not necessarily the best ones. You can't please everyone's taste.

Calling Amadeus an insignificant film is quite a stretch. It isn't just a biography of one man; it’s about a figure who shaped the very foundation of modern music. We're talking about someone who essentially pioneered the concept of the world tour back then. To me, this movie carries massive weight.
Tyler Stewart26 Tyler Stewart26 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jun 2005
#17 ·
What an absolute disaster of a list! Where on earth is Leon? If those movies don't even merit a spot in the top 100...
Jonathan Campbell5 Jonathan Campbell5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2005
#18 ·
Jerusalem armor is the absolute rule!!!
stormyviper11 stormyviper11 Active Member
81 messages
joined Nov 2007
#19 ·
No Battleship Potemkin? No D.W. Griffith? I don't think I've even seen anything by Carl Theodor Dreyer. And what about Father Jacques? Is he really not significant or influential enough to crack the top hundred? Citizen Kane made the cut, but Amberson's Grandeur didn't? Honestly, I have no clue what this list is actually measuring. If we're talking pure influence or how many movies were inspired by a certain work, they might as well have just stuffed the whole thing with flicks like Rambo or Smokey Bear... 😁
Maria Kelly6 Maria Kelly6 Member
39 messages
joined May 2004
#20 ·
I have to say, I was quite disappointed by "Talk to Her"—I honestly can't believe it made the cut

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads