Amy Mendoza25
Member
39 messages
joined Nov 2015
I feel the exact opposite. Immortal is honestly one of the biggest wastes of time I’ve ever sat through. For me, Sky Captain is easily fifty times better, even if they both end up in the same bucket eventually.
Sky Captain is just a self-aware, tongue-in-cheek nod to comic books—both the print stuff and the movies—and it doesn't pretend to be anything more than a fun ride. Sure, the cast is decent and the CGI environments don't always land quite as smoothly as intended, but by leaning into those washed-out colors, heavy light-to-dark contrasts, and that dominant brownish-gold tint, they at least managed to make it look cohesive.
Immortal, on the other hand, does the worst possible thing a Sci-Fi movie can do: it tries to act all pseudo-intellectual and mysterious about "big" life questions—who are our gods, what is true reality, where are we headed—only to leave you with nothing but a pile of half-baked teenage scribbles on a middle school chalkboard. It's fake, plain and simple, from a needlessly confusing start to a predictable, pathetic finish. Look, there are moments where it looks visually striking, but in the end, it's just pure style without any actual substance. That's my biggest gripe: people love claiming European Sci-Fi beats American trash, but here, it feels like Henry just made something that's triple-trash. He still has plenty to learn from the Americans...
🙂
...and now he'll get his chance with Sin City. Honestly, if I could stomach that movie, then so can he. Consider this another lesson in monochromatic color palettes and how a straightforward story, despite its simplicity, can pack a punch if it's actually well-articulated. My takeaway? Henry, stick to the comics. I don't really read them myself (much to my shame), so I probably won't run into you again anyway...