CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Intolerable Cruelty (2003)

Intolerable Cruelty (2003)

Started by Joseph Scott5 · · 👁 2 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Joseph Scott5nimblemarlin17brightscout63Walter Garcia6Peter Morris58steelharbor12darktiger20Jose Miller17Morgan Brown4
Joseph Scott5 Joseph Scott5 MemberOP
12 messages
joined Oct 2003
#1 ·
So, I finally sat down and watched that movie last night.
Honestly? It didn't really hit the mark for me.
Catherine looks stunning, obviously—but Clooney? Not so much. He’s nowhere near as good as he was in *Who Framed Roger Rabbit*.
The plot felt thin and way too predictable; you could see the punchlines coming from a mile away. That old guy on the monitors... I suppose if you're a kid under eight, he might actually be funny.
Anyway, it just lacked something. It felt unfinished and ultimately fell flat. I definitely expected more.
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#2 ·
That’s just the same old tired playbook, isn't it? Just a hot woman for the guys, a handsome guy for the girls, and who cares what they actually have to say about it...
brightscout63 brightscout63 Active Member
98 messages
joined Apr 2004
#3 ·
Hmm... I'll take your critique with a grain of salt, though—it's the Coen brothers we're talking about.
Honestly, this movie is a top contender for having one of the absolute dumbest translated titles out there.👎
Walter Garcia6 Walter Garcia6 Member
28 messages
joined Jan 2005
#4 ·
... I was actually planning on hitting up the theater with my girlfriend to catch this one... is it really that bad? 🙄
Peter Morris58 Peter Morris58 Member
32 messages
joined Mar 2003
#5 ·
🙂 This thing just climbed straight to the top of my all-time worst movies list. Honestly, it’s tied with that one flick I can’t even wrap my head around the title of... you know, where Ren Zellweger released that book about love or some other nonsense...

Anyway, total disaster. Thank god it was a "family day" so tickets only ran me $11. Awful. Just awful. The only funny part was when that killer accidentally puts a bullet in his mouth instead of his asthma inhaler 👍
steelharbor12 steelharbor12 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Oct 2004
#6 ·
It’s just your run-of-the-mill rom-com. Nothing to write home about. 🙄
darktiger20 darktiger20 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2004
#7 ·
brightscout63 said:Hmm... I’ll take your critique with a grain of salt, though. It's still the Coen brothers after all.

Nooo, those aren't the Coens. The real Coens were kidnapped and now they're digging ditches on Mars for some robot, while the "Koyens" are the ones making these gross movies... I just can't believe the actual Coens would ruin such a great idea.👎
Jose Miller17 Jose Miller17 Active Member
162 messages
joined Sep 2003
#8 ·
Look, the Coens clearly took a gamble here. By pivoting to a standard rom-com starring massive A-listers, they were basically chasing a paycheck.
The problem? It didn't hit the box office, and people actually hated it.
By stepping away from their usual style, they lost that sharp edge and sarcasm we love. They traded in their weird, beautiful character depth for something much more bland.
In the end, it managed to alienate both the casual viewers and the die-hard fans.
...
It feels like cheap candy compared to a Coen masterpiece.
Morgan Brown4 Morgan Brown4 Active Member
106 messages
joined Dec 2024
#9 ·
Chloe Morris12 said:🙂 This movie just shot straight to the top of my all-time worst list! It’s basically tied with that one flick I can't even remember the name of... you know, when Ren Zellweger released that book about love or some nonsense like that...

Anyway, total disaster. Thank God it was a "family day," otherwise those tickets would've cost me $11. Just awful. Truly terrible. The only funny part was when that killer puts a bullet in his mouth instead of his asthma inhaler 👍

uff, why were tickets at AMC Theatres so cheap back then? Or was that price for the whole family?

Man, if only we could get a reply from a forum regular from 2004. 😬

Anyway, watched it yesterday in Central Park.

Honestly, I had super low expectations based on the poster, the descriptions, the lead actors—I figured it’d be just another boring, cookie-cutter chick-flick rom-com.
I actually thought about skipping it entirely.

But hey, it ended up being a really pleasant surprise. 👍 There are some good laughs, and it's a shame Geoffrey Rush—well, his character—doesn't have a bigger role in the movie...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads