CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Miscellaneous › Why blondes?

Why blondes?

Started by William Castillo19 · · 👁 10 views · 30 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants William Castillo19Jacob Wilson50Raymond Hill45Nancy Chase9brightmooseMegan White4Emily Rodriguez8Raymond Ortiz4Paul Lopez7rustycanyon50ANicole Bakerdriftingorca24Joseph Scott5velvetgull9Alexander Parker69Benjamin Thomas2Tyler Bishop56Nicholas Robinson4Kate Hernandez5Keith Chavez7Richard Collins5
velvetgull9 velvetgull9 Active Member
113 messages
joined Dec 2005
#21 ·
You guys probably haven't heard this before, right?

Back in the Roman Empire, the Flavius family was known for having blonde hair. They were so famous that people actually started calling the hair color after them.
Then at some point, a bunch of newcomers moved in who couldn't understand half of what the locals were saying, so they just translated everything to "Blue."

I'm totally for real, too.
Alexander Parker69 Alexander Parker69 Active Member
117 messages
joined Mar 2003
#22 ·
Tiana said:I might have gotten a bit tangled up in my own reasoning there, but I’m hoping you guys can still see the core of what the judge was trying to get at.

Blue? 😛
Alexander Parker69 Alexander Parker69 Active Member
117 messages
joined Mar 2003
#23 ·
The term Blue doesn't actually stem from the color itself, but rather from the verb "to bleach."
It’s a fascinating bit of etymology, really. If you look at history, most people with naturally light hair originated from certain isolated northern territories—think of those remote, closed-off communities in the Pacific Northwest or rural Scandinavia—where limited genetic diversity led to specific traits manifesting as lighter hair. Because these early populations didn't grasp the subtle nuances of genetic principles, they linked the phenomenon to the frequent bleaching effects found in their local environments. They genuinely believed that soaking one's hair in certain waters would eventually shift its pigment. That was essentially the genesis of hair coloring; you had these early attempts at transformation, fueled by the misguided belief that simple immersion could alter one's appearance. At the very least, though, it gave rise to some of our earliest hygiene habits. As civilization progressed, people began experimenting with various solvents and chemical compounds until they finally stumbled upon results that actually worked. Once that happened, everything changed. Most people have no idea how much the ability to dye hair has actually influenced the trajectory of modern civilization. The moment we realized we could manipulate color, it acted as a massive turning point for society, ushering in a whole new era of self-expression and modern identity. Yet, the name Blue stuck, even if the original reasons for the term have faded into the dusty archives of scientific institutions and private collections held by historians.
William Castillo19 William Castillo19 NewcomerOP
8 messages
joined Feb 2004
#24 ·
Alright then... thanks everyone!! And wait, how do you actually say it when you've got Blue hair!?
Benjamin Thomas2 Benjamin Thomas2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Sep 2010
#25 ·
I’ve been stuck on this one question for a long time now... Why is it that we call a girl with light hair—you know, blonde or light brown—a "blonde" when we all know blue is a completely different color altogether? 🤷 I could really use some help here.
Tyler Bishop56 Tyler Bishop56 Member
43 messages
joined Dec 2007
#26 ·
Benjamin Thomas2 said:I’ve been stuck on this one for ages... Why do we call girls with blonde or light brown hair "blondes" when we all know blue is a completely different color entirely🤷 Help a guy out here.

Must be nice being you😢 ... I’m over here losing my mind over an even bigger question... why are Black people called Black when they're actually brown? Shouldn't we just call them "brownies" or something?
Benjamin Thomas2 Benjamin Thomas2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Sep 2010
#27 ·
It wouldn't be that hard for me, since yellow and blue don't really have anything to do with one another... but for you, it’s all about those subtle shades... even whites aren't exactly pure white once you look closely enough
Nicholas Robinson4 Nicholas Robinson4 Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2012
#28 ·
🤦 So, what should we call them? Little Yellows?

What kind of trivialities are you people even worrying about 🙂
Kate Hernandez5 Kate Hernandez5 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Sep 2009
#29 ·
Back in Old English, the word "blue" actually referred more to a specific shade or quality of light—kind of like how we distinguish between different tones today—while what we’d call deep blue was something else entirely. Like, a cloudy sky wouldn't have been called "blue," it would've been described differently, whereas a bright, clear day was the true "blue."
Look, that’s a massive oversimplification, but you get the gist of it.

Borrowed from some random corner of the internet that I won't bother naming because, frankly, why bother?
Keith Chavez7 Keith Chavez7 Newcomer
3 messages
joined May 2008
#30 ·
The Proto-Indo-European root *polvъ—which refers to something yellowish or pale (similar to how Old Church Slavonic uses *plavъ or the Polish *płowy)—is linked to the Lithuanian *palvas*, meaning pale. This essentially traces back to the idea of being washed out or faded, much like the Latin *pallidus* or the Greek *poliós* for grayish
Richard Collins5 Richard Collins5 Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2009
#31 ·
What's on your mind? 🤷Seriously, what is wrong with you people? Are you all colorblind or something?😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register