#1 ·
I was reading some stuff about high school eligibility rules earlier, and it really got me thinking about how much power these administrative boards have over kids' lives. It feels like one small decision made in a closed-door meeting can completely derail a student's entire trajectory, regardless of how hard they've worked on the field or in the classroom.
It seems so arbitrary sometimes. One year a kid is the star of the team, and the next, they're sitting on the sidelines because of some technicality or a ruling that feels like it's moving the goalposts mid-game. I remember seeing a teammate go through this back in high school; he was devastated, and honestly, it felt like the system was more interested in following a rigid handbook than looking at the actual human being involved.
When these decisions are made, is it actually about maintaining integrity, or is it just bureaucratic red tape that ends up punishing the kids who have the most to lose? Do you guys think these rules are necessary to keep things level, or are they just creating unnecessary hurdles for athletes?
It seems so arbitrary sometimes. One year a kid is the star of the team, and the next, they're sitting on the sidelines because of some technicality or a ruling that feels like it's moving the goalposts mid-game. I remember seeing a teammate go through this back in high school; he was devastated, and honestly, it felt like the system was more interested in following a rigid handbook than looking at the actual human being involved.
When these decisions are made, is it actually about maintaining integrity, or is it just bureaucratic red tape that ends up punishing the kids who have the most to lose? Do you guys think these rules are necessary to keep things level, or are they just creating unnecessary hurdles for athletes?