Guys' Corner - The team - honestly struggling with a title, this one's a real doozy :rofl:

Let me try to break this down
First off—I’m not even complaining about the ban I got—I just have a question
Look, on the damn internet, you can say you hate freaking Obama... then a few idiots show up to lecture you, trying to explain why he’s actually great and promising the FBI isn't going to kick down your door, but honestly, who cares?
Yet, on this damn forum, I’m apparently not allowed to mention that someone’s breasts are too huge... even though she posted them herself on the forum
So, who exactly is offended here? Who is the problem?
Seriously, let’s compare Obama’s impact on the entire planet to a couple of tits on an American forum... just being honest.

I’ve got a few more points for comparison
Let's look at Tumblr—how many damn pictures are actually on there? I’ve stated clearly above, over 1,300 times now, that there's something about it I don't like, and yet—miracle of miracles—I haven't been banned or silenced yet.
What kind of twisted rule is this—in life or on this forum—that you aren't allowed to say you dislike something just because someone has massive assets, similar to my Alpha?

What am I supposed to clarify? It’s all right there in black and white.
I said those massive breasts were ugly and I get slapped with a ban—I wasn't even this dense before now.
Maybe I'll just head over to Rihanna's page and tell her she's unattractive, then we'll see if some moderator decides to hand me a slap—or a ban, rather.

First you say you aren't complaining about the warning, yet here you are starting a whole debate about what's allowed in comments. Most of those general discussions don't really lead anywhere on this forum anyway.

Alright, so it actually is an appeal against the warning; I'll move the thread over there...

Michelle Evans said:First you say you aren't complaining about the warning, yet here you are starting a whole debate about what's allowed in comments. Most of those general discussions don't really lead anywhere on this forum anyway.

Alright, so it actually is an appeal against the warning; I'll move the thread over there...

Why the hell are you treating me like an idiot? I know exactly what I wrote.
Tell me WHY I can't say that some breasts—which belong to one of the billions of women on this planet—are stuck on the internet, looking gross and ugly?
I AM NOT APPEALING THE WARNING.
Put my thread back where I opened it; I'm not a moron.

Patrick Brown7 said:Let me try to break this down
First off—I’m not even complaining about the ban I got—I just have a question
Look, on the damn internet, you can say you hate freaking Obama... then a few idiots show up to lecture you, trying to explain why he’s actually great and promising the FBI isn't going to kick down your door, but honestly, who cares?
Yet, on this damn forum, I’m apparently not allowed to mention that someone’s breasts are too huge... even though she posted them herself on the forum
So, who exactly is offended here? Who is the problem?
Seriously, let’s compare Obama’s impact on the entire planet to a couple of tits on an American forum... just being honest.

I’m jumping on the bandwagon here to back up what my buddy said earlier in this thread. Honestly, some lady on the forum posted pictures of her chest—basically an entire dairy farm's worth of stuff—and man, it was just gross. Like, I don't know why anyone would post that, it totally ruined my mood. Naturally, I ended up getting a little worked up, and both me and Patrick Brown7 had to step outside for a smoke break. Even the boss joined in for a quick breather just to clear our heads.

So... yeah...

Patrick Brown7 said:Why the hell are you treating me like an idiot? I know exactly what I wrote.
Tell me WHY I can't say that some breasts—which belong to one of the billions of women on this planet—are stuck on the internet, looking gross and ugly?
I AM NOT APPEALING THE WARNING.
Put my thread back where I opened it; I'm not a moron.

Just take a breath.
I moved it back...

But you didn't mention which thread it was at the end of your opening post, nor did you provide a link to the topic or the specific post so someone could actually see it. You didn't even specify which PDF you were talking about, either. Plus, the title didn't make the nature of the complaint clear. That’s why I asked you to be more specific, and when you mentioned the card, I mistakenly assumed that was your grievance. My apologies...

Michelle Evans said:Just take a breath.
I moved it back...

But you didn't mention which thread it was at the end of your opening post, nor did you provide a link to the topic or the specific post so someone could actually see it. You didn't even specify which PDF you were talking about, either. Plus, the title didn't make the nature of the complaint clear. That’s why I asked you to be more specific, and when you mentioned the card, I mistakenly assumed that was your grievance. My apologies...

My apologies—I let things get a little under my skin there. Sorry about that.
So, when I was over there calling out certain people—just being honest about how much I dislike them—nobody said a word. But now that I’ve actually put my thoughts in writing? Suddenly, I’m "breaking the rules." Interesting. I'd love to know which specific rule dictates that out of two possible ways to comment, only one version is allowed and the other is forbidden. Which one is it?

Let's compare this to the biggest subforum—Politics.
So, let me get this straight—if I don't like these refugees running in here like absolute maniacs, I’m just not allowed to say it anywhere? Is that how this works?
Man, if I had to deal with politics too—actually having to build some kind of coherent, meaningful argument—I’d lose my mind. But for the sake of this team? For the sake of the team... damn. You either get it done or you don't. Period.

It seems like you can't manage to come up with a coherent title for a complaint here, let alone an actual meaningful grievance, but you sure have no trouble being insulting.

Who do you think you are, sliding into some woman's comments just to tell her she looks unattractive? Honestly, who actually cares what you think? To make matters worse, you're doing this on a thread where negative commentary is strictly against the rules. Besides, there's absolutely no requirement to comment at all. You're free to just stay silent. If you can't wrap your head around that simple concept, then at least try not to brag about being a functioning adult.

Richard Sanders7 said:It seems like you can't manage to come up with a coherent title for a complaint here, let alone an actual meaningful grievance, but you sure have no trouble being insulting.

Who do you think you are, sliding into some woman's comments just to tell her she looks unattractive? Honestly, who actually cares what you think? To make matters worse, you're doing this on a thread where negative commentary is strictly against the rules. Besides, there's absolutely no requirement to comment at all. You're free to just stay silent. If you can't wrap your head around that simple concept, then at least try not to brag about being a functioning adult.

Well, he’s interested in the logic behind the rules prohibiting negative feedback. I'm curious about that too, but we're never going to get an answer.

As for actually posting, he's a member of this forum. The woman posted those photos specifically for discussion. Asking "who are you" or "why does anyone care about your opinion" is just missing the point. Since we're talking about images, look at it like an art gallery. If an artist holds an exhibition and people start leaving nasty reviews about the pieces, they'll get a reprimand, and if they persist, they'll be kicked out onto the sidewalk. Someone attending an art show shouldn't be expected to trash the work the creator intentionally put on display for public viewing.

It’s pretty obvious why you can't leave negative comments on photos over on The team thread 😁
Negative feedback = girls stop posting pics = less traffic to the thread... and I think it's clear enough to everyone what that implies 😁

The Bill is actually quite simple 🙂

loneskipper77 said:It’s pretty obvious why you can't leave negative comments on photos over on The team thread 😁
Negative feedback = girls stop posting pics = less traffic to the thread... and I think it's clear enough to everyone what that implies 😁

The Bill is actually quite simple 🙂

But why should we be the ones worrying about that?

redbear2 said:But why should we be the ones worrying about that?

Since you’re all busy whining about being banned—which I guess is just what happens when you drop your "constructive," brutally honest feedback 😬
Well, maybe now you finally get why insults aren't allowed on this thread. There 😁

loneskipper77 said:Since you’re all busy whining about being banned—which I guess is just what happens when you drop your "constructive," brutally honest feedback 😬
Well, maybe now you finally get why insults aren't allowed on this thread. There 😁

No, you missed my point entirely. What I was actually asking is—why should we even care if she decides to post fewer photos?

redbear2 said:No, you missed my point entirely. What I was actually asking is—why should we even care if she decides to post fewer photos?

I didn't misinterpret anything at all. 😁
I could explain the whole situation in much greater detail, but I probably shouldn't do that here in public. 🙂 😁

redbear2 said:Well, he’s interested in the logic behind the rules prohibiting negative feedback. I'm curious about that too, but we're never going to get an answer.

As for actually posting, he's a member of this forum. The woman posted those photos specifically for discussion. Asking "who are you" or "why does anyone care about your opinion" is just missing the point. Since we're talking about images, look at it like an art gallery. If an artist holds an exhibition and people start leaving nasty reviews about the pieces, they'll get a reprimand, and if they persist, they'll be kicked out onto the sidewalk. Someone attending an art show shouldn't be expected to trash the work the creator intentionally put on display for public viewing.

Everyone has different tastes. I’m sure there’s a woman on this forum that I find attractive, but you might not see it at all. If that happens, you'll just swoop in and tell her she's ugly, she'll get offended, and then she'll stop posting photos altogether. And what am I left with then? Just scrolling through your comments? You know exactly what I mean, right?

Richard Sanders7 said:Everyone has different tastes. I’m sure there’s a woman on this forum that I find attractive, but you might not see it at all. If that happens, you'll just swoop in and tell her she's ugly, she'll get offended, and then she'll stop posting photos altogether. And what am I left with then? Just scrolling through your comments? You know exactly what I mean, right?

HahaHAHAHAHAHAH

My bad. 🤣

Look, I can see where you're coming from. People shouldn't go around telling others their bodies are gross or calling them names. But if someone posts a photo and you just aren't feeling it—that shouldn't be a punishable offense just for stating an opinion. I'm not entirely sure what the original poster meant, but he mentioned he wasn't a fan of certain features because they were too large. In my book, that's a perfectly valid observation, and handing out a ban for that feels like pure nonsense. There's a difference between being malicious and simply having a preference. It's all about those blurry lines; nobody actually knows where the "allowed" zone ends and the "banned" zone begins. That ambiguity is honestly what bugs me the most.

Hey, hey 🤣

redbear2, you're telling me... I wrote a review about lamb being "gross" on Yelp once—yeah, used that exact word—and they slapped me with a strike 🤣. But that’s just one thing; I haven't actually seen any updates there yet, for now 😂

Patrick Brown7 said:Hey, hey 🤣

redbear2, you're telling me... I wrote a review about lamb being "gross" on Yelp once—yeah, used that exact word—and they slapped me with a strike 🤣. But that’s just one thing; I haven't actually seen any updates there yet, for now 😂

True, but you have to account for the human element here. In this specific discussion, we aren't really critiquing the meat; we're looking at how a person might emotionally react to a comment. If there isn't a functional reason to use words like "gross" or "disgusting," then it's probably better to just leave them out. On the other hand, simply not liking something is perfectly fine and totally legitimate. We aren't all going to be everyone's cup of tea.