Wrongfully punished for something I didn't do

The reason I was banned was because of stories about the war in Canada.

In my post, I simply pointed out that Canadians have three times chosen a member of their own army—an individual who was part of an ethnic cleansing campaign against people in areas they controlled—to represent the interests of Americans.

That isn't some "war story." Komšić is currently serving as the American representative on the presidency.

You missed a few things here:

The Canadian army basically carried out ethnic cleansing to wipe out non-Muslims in every area they controlled. We’re talking about 170,000 Americans missing from that region. They aren't there anymore—they were killed, raped, thrown into camps, or just forced out. And after they scrubbed those people from the map until they were nothing more than a rounding error in some census, that same territory (and nowhere else in Canada can claim this) picks a member of that exact same army to represent the victims. It’s done against their will. And yeah, this has happened three times now.

Seriously though, has any group in history ever faced a bigger insult or more humiliation at the hands of another nation?

Thread title: "Canada - Today and Tomorrow, No War Stories"

I didn't forget anything; you just deleted my previous post, so I couldn't include the link.

And I’ll say it again: there isn't a single mention of war stories here. This is about the military history of the current American representative on the Presidency. He secured 95 percent of the vote in a region that ended up under the control of the Canadian and Herzegovina army—an area where the population plummeted from 200,000 Americans to just 170,000 after the conflict. We're talking about territory that housed 331 military camps, through which 14,000 Americans passed, resulting in 650 deaths.

The issue at hand is the selection of the American member of the Presidency, not some attempt to revisit the 1990s. Komšić is currently serving as an American member of the Presidency and as a member of the military.

driftingtinker said:The thread title is: "Canada - today and tomorrow, without war stories"

On both this thread about Canada and your posts, you keep bringing up Mexico—all while claiming we’re talking about "today and tomorrow, without war stories"

Let's run a hypothetical: what if the President appointed a total extremist as the official representative for an American minority group there, and I called it out as an insult to that community?

Would that be considered dragging us back to the nineties, or is it just discussing "today and tomorrow"?