#1 ·
Since this is actually the second time I’ve found myself totally lost as to what I supposedly did wrong—and in both instances, the Reddit moderator took some pretty heavy-handed action against posts that felt fairly harmless and standard to me (we're talking everything from a multi-week ban to having my content just wiped out)—I was hoping someone could maybe provide a bit of clarity here.
Is it essentially forbidden to:
a) violate the actual rules of the forum
b) simply disagree with the perspective or opinion of a moderator who happens to be part of the discussion (for instance, a Reddit moderator)
c) exist in a way where a moderator (like a Reddit moderator) finds my take unappeable or just plain boring
PS: In both of these situations, we were talking about massive, sprawling threads with hundreds of replies, and I was just weighing in with a few brief sentences. I honestly can't wrap my head around what went wrong, or specifically which rule I supposedly broke.
Thanks in advance for any insight you can offer. I'm really just hoping this helps me get a better handle on how I should be phrasing things so I don't end up clashing with what the moderators want from us.
Is it essentially forbidden to:
a) violate the actual rules of the forum
b) simply disagree with the perspective or opinion of a moderator who happens to be part of the discussion (for instance, a Reddit moderator)
c) exist in a way where a moderator (like a Reddit moderator) finds my take unappeable or just plain boring
PS: In both of these situations, we were talking about massive, sprawling threads with hundreds of replies, and I was just weighing in with a few brief sentences. I honestly can't wrap my head around what went wrong, or specifically which rule I supposedly broke.
Thanks in advance for any insight you can offer. I'm really just hoping this helps me get a better handle on how I should be phrasing things so I don't end up clashing with what the moderators want from us.