Uncle Sam, I need moderator protection in the history sub!

Basically, for quite some time now, lonetrucker4 has been subjecting me to an unprecedented level of harassment. Every single time I post anything regarding WWII, he publicly targets me, labeling me a Nazi—an accusation I simply cannot tolerate much longer. Please, take a look at my post and then examine Zoran's justification for the ban; it’s completely baseless. If his reasoning actually held any water, he would have banned the other user I was replying to—the one who actually suggested digging up Auschwitz to unearth "new truths."
If I don't receive a proper response from you, I'll have to assume I'm not welcome on this forum, and I'll likely be forced to contact the appropriate legal authorities just to protect myself...

Still nothing?

Do I really need to go into further detail regarding the harassment I’m enduring from lonetrucker4?

Should I—or rather, am I even allowed—to mention when this all started and point back to that specific turning point where lonetrucker4 decided I was a fascist and began treating me publicly as such? You’ve all seen his explanation, highlighted in blue, where he goes as far as labeling me a sympathizer of the worst kind...

And you surely saw Taroth's post, where he suggests forming an international commission just to nail down the exact death toll at Auschwitz.

It was brief, so I’ll just quote him here:
"Why not establish, or rather, revise the numbers of those killed at Auschwitz?
Let an international commission handle it, so we can finally end all this speculation about figures ranging from zero to 700,000."

lonetrucker4 replies to him, yet there is absolutely no disciplinary action taken.

Then, Lavore writes the following, echoing the call for a new census with these words:

Lavore says: Look at this post,
"The Anti-Fascist League is calling for:

Personally, I would go a step further:

1.Exhume the sites at Auschwitz to determine if there are remains buried there.

2.Issue a ruling that the government should provide significant compensation—full reimbursement for historical research costs—to anyone who discovers that someone was wrongly listed on the official Auschwitz registry, or that someone was omitted entirely."

Again, lonetrucker4 doesn't react to this post at all. Instead, he reacts to my rebuttal to Lavore and bans *only* me. My argument was simple: "Where would we be if the government actually paid out reparations for errors that might have been intentional, or part of the policies of past or present administrations? It’s impossible, it makes no sense, and there is no way a state aware of its own failures would ever agree to a revision and subsequent payouts. Besides, corrupt and opportunistic people like us would undoubtedly find ways to fraudulently add thousands of unverified victims to the count."

"That is why the only solution is an independent international commission—assuming anything truly independent even exists in this world anymore—to dig through both the archives and the entire site itself."
"And speaking of archives, do you honestly believe Belgrade would ever agree to an independent investigation or hand over untainted sources to any commission?"

I am asking: out of all these "sympathizers," why am I the only one who received a red card and a ban?
Is lonetrucker4 waging some sort of personal vendetta against me simply because he doesn't like me, or because he's branded me a fascist?
I am asking the admin: is lonetrucker4 permitted to act this way? Is he allowed to publicly label and target forum members like this?
I am also asking how far lonetrucker4's authority extends over the History sub-forum, so I know how to proceed with him and with all of you... unless I receive proper protection and a warning to lonetrucker4 to cease this behavior immediately.

Jeffrey Adams said:Do me a favor and look at my post and lonetrucker4's excuse for the ban—it’s total nonsense.

I didn't call you a "fascist," I called you a "fascist-lover." You're just recycling those same old right-wing talking points we've heard for decades about "independent international commissions," "neutral investigations," shady sources hidden by Belgrade, and "sealing off entire regions."

Told you a hundred times, answered you a hundred times.

Jeffrey Adams said:Did you catch this post by Taroth suggesting some international commission should step in to recount the exact number of victims at Auschwitz?

It’s short, so here’s the gist:
"Why not establish, or revise, the numbers of those killed at Auschwitz?
Let an international commission handle it, so we can finally end all this speculation ranging from zero to 700,000."


lonetrucker4 hits back, but there's no penalty.

Because the guy hadn't piped up about this topic before (at least not that I recall). I treated him like a newcomer and answered his question (post #2000) with the actual facts. After that, he stopped pushing it. You, on the other hand, haven't. You did it plenty of times before, and even after (post #2005), completely ignoring everything both I and others have said about it.

"2. decide that the state will provide significant compensation and reimbursement for historical research costs to anyone who finds someone wrongly listed or missing from the official Auschwitz registry."

I don't think the idea is great for a dozen reasons, but it's not total garbage. You just twisted it into something else entirely again.

I'm asking why, out of all these "fascist sympathizers," I'm the only one getting a red card and a ban?
Is lonetrucker4 waging some personal vendetta against me because he doesn't like my face or thinks I'm a fascist?

Not a chance. Most of the complaints filed against me since I became a mod—we're talking over three years now—are tied to this exact subject: the Second World War and denying the victims of the fascist regime.