#1 ·
The "moderator" slapped a three-day ban on me just because I posted someone else's photo and she decided to file a complaint.
Let’s get one thing straight: that image (there were two, I don't know which one she's fixating on) is available on Google to roughly 5 billion people. Anyone—me, you, or anyone else—can find it with a single click. Yet, apparently, using it here is some MASSIVE violation because it belongs to someone else.
On this forum, and even in this thread , people post all kinds of images. Let’s look at a hypothetical example... If someone posts a picture of Anthony Hopkins, they are technically posting someone else's property. But under her logic, that would be a BAN because it’s someone else's shot. Unbelievable. There is zero actual difference between a photo of Anthony Hopkins and the two images I posted.
At the moderator's personal request, I can post a direct Google link right now proving this image is accessible to 5 billion people.
This is a blatant violation of my rights. This moderator—who, frankly, seems to be acting purely by accident—has absolutely no clue how to moderate. She owes me a personal apology and needs to lift this ban immediately.
Furthermore, she already handed me a ban before for "off-topic" comments. During that discussion, the other side didn't even get a warning, likely because they're her personal friends, but that's a whole other conversation.
This is hands down the most bizarre ban I've ever dealt with. It feels like pure personal animosity from this "moderator." She stalks the exact threads I post in, day and night, constantly dropping new rules that she doesn't even follow herself.
I am requesting an urgent review of this ban and a reality check for this moderator's distorted view of things.
Thanks.
Let’s get one thing straight: that image (there were two, I don't know which one she's fixating on) is available on Google to roughly 5 billion people. Anyone—me, you, or anyone else—can find it with a single click. Yet, apparently, using it here is some MASSIVE violation because it belongs to someone else.
On this forum, and even in this thread , people post all kinds of images. Let’s look at a hypothetical example... If someone posts a picture of Anthony Hopkins, they are technically posting someone else's property. But under her logic, that would be a BAN because it’s someone else's shot. Unbelievable. There is zero actual difference between a photo of Anthony Hopkins and the two images I posted.
At the moderator's personal request, I can post a direct Google link right now proving this image is accessible to 5 billion people.
This is a blatant violation of my rights. This moderator—who, frankly, seems to be acting purely by accident—has absolutely no clue how to moderate. She owes me a personal apology and needs to lift this ban immediately.
Furthermore, she already handed me a ban before for "off-topic" comments. During that discussion, the other side didn't even get a warning, likely because they're her personal friends, but that's a whole other conversation.
This is hands down the most bizarre ban I've ever dealt with. It feels like pure personal animosity from this "moderator." She stalks the exact threads I post in, day and night, constantly dropping new rules that she doesn't even follow herself.
I am requesting an urgent review of this ban and a reality check for this moderator's distorted view of things.
Thanks.