Sam Alvarez4 said:basically, COVID was an experiment. 🤦
but shhh.
you aren't allowed to mention the Masons, Bilderberg, and all that.
instead of those guys, just use the term 'deep state'.
And that’s really everything you gathered from that and the other posts? Saying it was an "experiment" is just one possibility brought up in the discussion—honestly, you probably shouldn't have even read it, because this comment makes it look like you were banging your head against a wall instead of actually reading with some comprehension...
It's the same deal with your comments about beloved Macron—yeah, Sam Alvarez4, we all know what Macron said—we are at war! A sanitary war! (or however our people on the forums translated "at war with the virus")—your narrow perspective prevents you from seeing that the issue was specifically the terminology he used to describe something that should be treated like a natural disaster. Even announcing the military coming out onto the streets is totally inappropriate for the situation. That's the issue with Sam Alvarez4—maybe since you're French, you're used to seeing the military walking the streets and dealing with heavy-handed bans (thank God we've seen enough of that lately), maybe that feels normal or justified to you—but this is America, Sam Alvarez4. We aren't used to that, it isn't normal to us, and we don't intend to get used to Napoleon-style tactics...
Get it?
Or did you just feel personally attacked by my description of Macron being a little Napoleon? You shouldn't do that—that's not popular here either—we don't do idol worship, Sam Alvarez4. I'll say it again: this is America...
And yeah, Sam Alvarez4—the idea of the deep state acting through the virus was dismissed in the thread—because the core of Kissingerian population control doctrine isn't based on controlling a virus (since you can't control a virus) but on controlling food...
There was joking and fiction in the thread too, which is fine. That wouldn't ruin the topic. Plus, there was geopolitical terminology used that clearly still confuses you, making it hard for you to follow or understand certain posts.
Regardless, the thread was unfortunately killed. The moderator cleaning things up ended up shutting the whole thing down in the middle of the chaos—obviously, they didn't have the patience to let the topic evolve, nor do they have a basic grasp of the geopolitical vocabulary used in the PDF to shorten complex ideas. Also, the demand to track everything with links is ridiculous, because this kind of geopolitical analysis is inherently opposed to posting links—otherwise, it wouldn't be analyzing the unknown, it would just be posting established facts....
For instance, I don't agree with a colleague who wrote that the virus was used for population reduction (if I remember correctly, since the post was deleted), and I explained my disagreement to him. But mocking a colleague for veering into "alternative" territory is way too much, because the connotations of population control are undeniably present in all the synchronized measures being taken. In that context, mentioning the deep state is perfectly legitimate for discussing centers of power... just like asking for a link to such a claim is absurd. What was the colleague supposed to provide? A link to a Kissinger statement saying "whoever controls the food controls the people, and whoever controls the money controls the world"? Or quote Mackinder and his 1904 Heartland theory, which is basically official Anglo doctrine to this day?
Have you even read Mackinder? We told you to read it for a reason...☕
Let's tackle the geopolitical side of this thing with one specific question—just to see if we're talking actual geopolitics here or just diving down an alt-history rabbit hole.
So, Sam Alvarez4, do you think the whole setup where German troops dressed up in Polish uniforms to hit that border outpost back in 1939 was the real spark for the war, or is that just some conspiracy theory nonsense for the fringe crowds? ☕
