CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Cold Pursuit (2019)

Cold Pursuit (2019)

Started by Rebecca Scott95 · · 👁 5 views · 21 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rebecca Scott95stormylynx12briskeagle3nimblemarlin6Noah Roberts46Nancy Williams58Joshua Smith5Edward Price6brightheron64Daniel Kelly57Sandra Brooks85Jacob Rogers2bluebadger14Jacob AlvarezFrank Chase6cosmiclynx57
Rebecca Scott95 Rebecca Scott95 MemberOP
25 messages
joined Nov 2021
#1 ·
Taken


Taken
is an upcoming action thriller.

Rally driver John Wick (Liam Neeson) goes on a revenge mission against a drug cartel after they take his son's life.

Director: Hans Petter Moland
Cast: Liam Neeson, Emmy Rossum, Laura Dern

Release Date: February 8, 2019

Trailer

image

IMDb
stormylynx12 stormylynx12 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Dec 2013
#2 ·
Liam Neeson👍 This one actually looks worth your time!
briskeagle3 briskeagle3 Active Member
59 messages
joined Dec 2012
#3 ·
It feels like Liam Neeson has found his specific groove lately—he just picks a formula and runs with it...
nimblemarlin6 nimblemarlin6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Aug 2012
#4 ·
It’s honestly wild to think about—we have an actor with the kind of range you just don't see every day, yet there's this looming possibility that Liam Neeson will ultimately just be remembered as the guy from those cheap B-movie thrillers like Death Wish.
It’s kind of like how people look at Robert De Niro these days—everyone just associates him with those comedy roles now.

Neeson brings this weirdly warm, human touch to his serial killer roles—it’s almost charming how much you actually enjoy watching him stack up the bodies.
Have you guys noticed that little sympathetic look he gets on his face right when he’s choking someone out? It’s like—he genuinely thinks he’s finished the job, but then the guy twitches, realizes he's still breathing, and Liam just has to go back in and finish the business... :-)

I'll give this one a watch.👍
Noah Roberts46 Noah Roberts46 Regular
407 messages
joined Jun 2021
#5 ·
Didn't Neeson say just a few years ago that he was done with action movies?
Nancy Williams58 Nancy Williams58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Apr 2023
#6 ·
Honestly, if you ask me, Liam Neeson could basically ride this wave until he retires. Even if he only lands a solid hit every third or fourth movie, I’m totally fine with that. As long as he occasionally drops a genuinely great flick—like A Walk Among the Tombstones, which was killer but way too underrated—it’s all good in my book.

Looking at the trailer, I don't know... it feels like a bit of a departure from his usual style. It’s giving me those Guy Ritchie vibes, you know? Maybe the trailer is just playing tricks on us, though.

I mean, honestly, what else are you going to expect when Neeson kicks things off by saying, "I'm just a regular guy"? It’s basically just him leaning into the self-parody at this point. 🙂 I'm expecting a good movie...
Joshua Smith5 Joshua Smith5 Active Member
68 messages
joined Jul 2010
#7 ·
Absolute idiots with Skarsgård. You've got Bruno Ganz basically speaking English so the whole world can understand him, plus the Man from Mostar, Sergej Trifunović.

It looks like Moland decided to pull a Haneke and just imitate his own style, frame by frame.
Edward Price6 Edward Price6 Active Member
97 messages
joined Feb 2017
#8 ·
It's a good movie, definitely not your typical action flick with Liam Neeson.

I really dig the dark humor and some of the writing choices.

And that snow... as always, it just elevates the whole thing.

Highly recommend if you want some fun.

The movie loses steam a bit toward the end, but the finale is cool. So, all in all, worth a watch.
brightheron64 brightheron64 Regular
408 messages
joined Apr 2016
#9 ·
Well, I really stepped in it this time...

I started by watching the original—A Walk Among the Tombstones—and then decided to check this version out.

Man, the original was just so much better, and I’m honestly making a vow to myself right now that this is the very last time I attempt to sit through some Hollywood remake of a great European film...
Daniel Kelly57 Daniel Kelly57 Active Member
228 messages
joined Sep 2016
#10 ·
brightheron64 said:Man, I really messed up here.

I watched the original first— A Walk Among the Tombstones—and then went and saw this.

Dammit, the original is way better. I’m promising myself right now that this is the last time I try watching some Hollywood remake of a solid European film.

Yeah. Compared to the original, this is absolute garbage and nothing can save it. But that’s because the original is a total gem.🍿>
Sandra Brooks85 Sandra Brooks85 Member
12 messages
joined Sep 2013
#11 ·
What's the deal with this garbage?

Basically, the director just remade his own movie, except this version is actually funny. It leans into every possible cliché to poke fun at everything from traditional masculinity to feminism, minorities, and political correctness.
Daniel Kelly57 Daniel Kelly57 Active Member
228 messages
joined Sep 2016
#12 ·
Adam Cooper16 said:What's this garbage even about?

It’s basically the same director ripping off his own work, but this version is way funnier. He leans hard into every possible cliché, poking fun at everything from masculinity and feminism to minorities and political correctness.

I don't know. Honestly, after seeing the original, this version was just laughable and almost unwatchable. The acting was pretty weak. It’s the first Liam Neeson movie I’ve seen that felt totally ridiculous. To me, the first version is about ten times funnier. Plus, the cast is leagues better—especially the lead and the villain.🍿
Sandra Brooks85 Sandra Brooks85 Member
12 messages
joined Sep 2013
#13 ·
Grace Sanders24 said:I find the first version about ten times funnier.

From what I can tell, all the best sequences and nods from the original made it into this version, aside from one bit involving a Mexican finding an Albanian provocation hidden in a road sign year—which was a great touch. This American version actually adds a few clever bits the original lacked, such as replacing the Mexicans with Native Americans, which adds a nice layer of political correctness satire to the mix. If you watch them back-to-back, you might find this one too derivative to enjoy. As for the humor, if you're judging strictly by delivery and vibe, sure, you could call this one funnier, but from a screenwriting standpoint, the original definitely holds the edge.
Daniel Kelly57 Daniel Kelly57 Active Member
228 messages
joined Sep 2016
#14 ·
Adam Cooper16 said:From what I can tell, all the best sequences and gags from the original made the cut here. Aside from that one bit I remember where the Mexicans find an Albanian provocation hidden in a road sign year or something—which was a killer gag—this American version actually adds a few great bits the original didn't have. Plus, swapping out the Mexicans for Native Americans adds this extra layer of political correctness satire to the mix. I don't know, if you watch them back-to-back, you might find this new one too derivative to even bother with. But if we're talking about execution and vibe, you could argue it's funnier depending on how you look at it, though script-wise, the original definitely holds more wit.

That’s exactly what I was getting at. For me personally, the acting makes this one way funnier. I always vibed more with the dark humor in the original. Since I'd already seen the original, I went into this one prepared, so of course the punchlines felt a bit blunt. Honestly, the whole thing was a letdown for me. It feels just like that original French movie about the guy in the stroller being messed with by a Black guy, which the Americans remade last year.🍿
Jacob Rogers2 Jacob Rogers2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2019
#15 ·
I’m always talking about catching a movie and then never actually doing it, so I’m definitely sitting down for this one today. 😁 It better be worth it, though—it's got Liam Neeson in it.
bluebadger14 bluebadger14 Member
24 messages
joined Mar 2018
#16 ·
Jacob Rogers2 said:It’s gotta be good, though—it's got Liam Neeson in it.

Not necessarily...
Jacob Alvarez Jacob Alvarez Active Member
58 messages
joined Apr 2021
#17 ·
So, basically just another cookie-cutter Hollywood remake of a solid foreign film.
Sandra Brooks85 Sandra Brooks85 Member
12 messages
joined Sep 2013
#18 ·
Jacob Alvarez said:Basically, just a standard Hollywood rip-off of a solid foreign film.


More like a slightly smarter clone...
brightheron64 brightheron64 Regular
408 messages
joined Apr 2016
#19 ·
Grace Sanders24 said:It feels quite similar to that original French film about the man in the wheelchair being cared for by the Black gentleman, which I believe was remade by Americans just last year...🍿

When you sit down to compare *The Upside* with its predecessor, *The Intouchables*, you really start to weigh the nuances of how different cultures approach that same heartfelt story... It’s fascinating to see how the American version tries to find its own rhythm while staying true to the spirit of the original, even if the vibes feel just a little bit different once you get into the thick of it... One feels perhaps more polished for a domestic audience, whereas the other has that raw, unmistakable energy that made the first one such a global phenomenon... It makes you wonder if any remake can ever truly capture that lightning in a bottle...

I honestly can't wrap my head around why anyone would even consider watching it... I had such an absolute blast with the original that I don't see any reason to go and ruin that perfect experience for myself...

Jacob Alvarez said:It feels like just your typical Hollywood remake of a great foreign film, lacking that original spark...

Honestly, movies like that only really land with people who haven't seen the original masterpiece or those who just can't be bothered to follow along with subtitles...

And then people actually try to use the Box Office as some kind of benchmark for quality... 🤦

A Walk Among the Tombstones (2014)...
The estimated budget is sitting right around $3.5 million...
The Opening Weekend USA brought in $5,208 back on August 28, 2016, during its initial Limited Release...
The opening weekend numbers just hit the books for the September 16, 2016, release, showing a domestic gross of $49,284... which certainly leaves a lot to be desired if we're looking at the broader trajectory...
The total worldwide gross has officially climbed to $904,496...

If you haven’t had a chance to sit down with Taken yet, I really can't recommend it enough... It’s one of those rare films where you just feel completely swept up in the tension, especially with Liam Neeson leading the charge through such a gritty, visceral landscape... There is something about his presence that just anchors the whole experience, making the stakes feel incredibly heavy and real... It isn't just another action flick; it has this raw, driving energy that keeps you leaning in, wondering exactly how far he’ll go to get justice... Truly a standout piece of filmmaking that lingers in your mind long after the credits roll...
The opening weekend numbers for the wide release on February 10, 2019, have finally come in, showing a domestic start of $11,030,233... which feels like a pretty solid foundation to build upon as we move forward...
The domestic box office numbers just trickled in for April 18, 2019, and we’re looking at a total of $32,138,862 across the States... quite an interesting start for the weekend, I must say...
As of April 18, 2019, the cumulative Worldwide Gross has officially climbed to $59,213,931...
Frank Chase6 Frank Chase6 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2012
#20 ·
I haven't actually sat down to watch it yet—I just found out the movie even exists! But honestly, after reading the description, I had to laugh. At this point, movies starring Liam Neeson are starting to feel like a total parody of themselves.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads