Misinterpreting the forum rules

Dear wonderful super moderator Niche
I’m looking at the general rules over on Reddit

Disclaimer regarding the liability of Reddit publishers
Posts on this forum represent solely the views and opinions of the authors, not the forum publishers, moderators, or administrators. Reddit is not responsible for the content of posts or the opinions expressed within them.

So, you, acting as a moderator, seem to be the first one ignoring those very rules

Yesterday, I started a thread about how many people have been reading the Zapatistas discussion since you removed me from there. You shut the whole thing down after just three posts for reasons known only to yourselves, and honestly, that last sentence was quite a way to wrap things up
post #4 by Niche, the final sentence
"And I have no intention of giving space to lies and fabrications here either."

Are you saying you won't allow any lying or making things up in that thread?
Because, truthfully, where exactly did I lie or make things up?

It seems you can do whatever you please... I've seen it happen through your moderation, especially with my posts being labeled as trolling for four years now, yet a user isn't even allowed to defend themselves...

You claim someone is lying

but you don't provide an argument, nor do you prove it, and then you elegantly just close the thread

And it’s been like this for four years... deleting posts, issuing warnings, and so on...

But you can't ignore the facts regarding the view counts and post numbers on the Zapatistas thread since you pulled me away
I don't know the ownership structure of Reddit, but if I were the owner, I'd wonder if I really need moderators and admins whose policies are actively destroying the core function of the forum—which is reading, writing, and communicating...
Go ahead, shut down this thread democratically too, under the guise of "commenting on moderation"
No, I am not critiquing your job performance. I am critiquing the idea that you can call someone a liar or a fabricator without any sanctions or evidence, all while wielding the power of a moderator who clearly feels exempt from everything else
🐔

Brandon Ross said:So you're saying you won't tolerate any lying or making things up on this thread?
Well, where exactly have I lied or made anything up?

Just look at your own posts:

Brandon Ross said:About a month ago, some female user kicked me off the serious discussion threads—you know, stuff like child support, domestic violence, divorces, etc.—just because she used her group of friends, both online and in real life, to influence the moderator to give me a permanent ban from those topics.

It wasn't some friend of hers pulling the strings. The moderation team collectively decided to pull you from the site because you were spreading misogyny, being intolerant, constantly picking fights with other users, and just being a total provocateur.

Brandon Ross said:And I was never crude, I never cursed, and I definitely didn't troll, even though the moderators—who clearly lean toward feminism—unjustly labeled me that way based on their "friends'" intervention.

Actually, you were insulting people, trolling, provoking, and spamming; you were basically a walking violation of the forum rules. And honestly, the way you throw around "feminism" like it's an insult is just bizarre—it doesn't make any sense at all.

Brandon Ross said:She did that because she didn't like my comments regarding her announcement about her own divorce... she uses this forum as a primary way to communicate with her family, husband, and kids.
She already kicked her husband off the boards in the exact same way, because when it comes to the "moderator-friendship" pact, truth and reality don't mean a thing.

I honestly don't know who "she" is, I don't care who her husband is, and frankly, I couldn't care less.

I really intended to go through both of your posts line by line to debunk every single lie, but after the third sentence, I realized that doing so would be a massive waste of my time. Almost everything you've said here is pure fiction. I say "almost" only because I think I found maybe one quarter of a sentence that could theoretically be interpreted as true if you squinted and provided the right context, but that's about it. So, I'm done with this whole saga about your biases and your typical drama-filled stories.