CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Bisexual orgies and child-eating monsters

Bisexual orgies and child-eating monsters

Started by Peter Peterson · · 👁 5 views · 6 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Peter PetersonTyler Cruz32Morgan Rodriguez57Hannah Hayesruggedcobra8Christian Howard2
Peter Peterson Peter Peterson MemberOP
14 messages
joined Jan 2019
#1 ·
Since I’m absolutely fed up with my threads getting locked every time I try to speak my mind, I’m filing a formal complaint against Grace Kim80 here.

This thread was shut down—and unless I somehow broke some obscure rule I wasn't aware of, it shouldn't have been.
The "offense"? I uttered two short phrases: > bisexual orgies and child-devourers.
What kind of ridiculous criterion is that?????
One possible explanation is that we're looking at pure fascism—where the moderator, Grace Kim80, acts as a shield for bisexual orgies and devourers, refusing to let people realize the grim reality of what these Satanists are actually doing.

This is just one more example of how Grace Kim80 handles moderation; get her off the mod team (though, if possible, maybe just change her username first).

I know Handžo pays you guys well, but seriously, give me a break—this is way, way too much.
Tyler Cruz32 Tyler Cruz32 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2012
#2 ·
If you keep this up, you won't just find your thread locked; you'll be facing a permanent ban.

I believe I have already advised you to refrain from posting those theories about "child eaters"—you chose to ignore me. Furthermore, this platform is not some random PDF where anyone can just blurt out nonsense regarding "bisexual orgies" without any regard for the context or the subject at hand. It is quite evident when a thread author begins entertaining such constructs and trolling within their own discussion that the topic has lost all merit. If you feel the need to discuss bisexuality and orgies, perhaps you should head over to a hazelnut forum instead.

You have received exactly what you sought, and I shall not dignify your insults toward me or the rest of the community with a response, as I have already reported your conduct to the moderators.

Regards.
Morgan Rodriguez57 Morgan Rodriguez57 Active Member
216 messages
joined Oct 2011
#3 ·
There’s plenty of much worse stuff buried in that PDF—not to mention all those spammers who act like they own the place... 🥳

Anyway, regarding those "bisexual orgiasts"—what exactly is supposed to be offensive there? Is it being bisexual? Or the fact that someone enjoys orgies? I don't quite get it... If bisexual people exist, and if people who enjoy orgies exist, then there’s naturally going to be an overlap where you find both... 🤷

On a site like Reddit, you can talk about orgies and bisexuality from a sexual standpoint, but moralizing is strictly against the rules—whereas on a platform like FaithNet, it really SHOULD be the other way around... ☕
Peter Peterson Peter Peterson MemberOP
14 messages
joined Jan 2019
#4 ·
Grace Kim80 said:If you keep this up, not only is your thread getting locked, but you’re going to end up with a partial ban.

I already told you before—stop posting those theories about "child eaters"—but clearly, you weren't listening. Furthermore, we aren't some random PDF where people can just blow hot air about "bisexual orgies" without any context or relevance to the topic. Quite frankly, when the thread starter resorts to using these kinds of constructs to troll within their own discussion, the whole thing becomes worthless. If you want to talk about bisexuality and orgies, go find a hazelnut shop.

You got exactly what you asked for, and I'm not even going to dignify your insults toward me or everyone else here with a response, because I've already reported you to the mods.

Regards.

You didn't say it—go find that specific post and quote it right here.
You claimed I shouldn't mention the flat earth, yet at the very same time, the Bible itself describes it—which is nothing more than censorship and a blatant suppression of free speech.

And even if you did say it, it’s obvious that it doesn't align with the fair standards of this forum.

Which essentially means anti-Christians can spit on whatever they want, while Christians aren't allowed to state a simple truth.

If I said we need to tear down bisexual orgs, the eaters, and demonic forces, that is perfectly normal—those are villains and enemies of humanity who kidnap children and sacrifice them.

Apply that same logic then: ban everyone else from mentioning pedophilia or the wealth of the church. But of course, you won't, because you love anything that drags the Bible through the mud, whether directly or otherwise.
And wouldn't you know it—suddenly that doesn't count as "hazelnut" territory.

But instead, you censor everything that exposes Satan, either directly or indirectly.

Your remarks are laughable; you would have been better off not responding at all.

As for the partial ban? Oh, I'm absolutely trembling—my heart is just breaking.
Hannah Hayes Hannah Hayes Member
11 messages
joined Aug 2018
#5 ·
😂 😂

Hands down, this is the best troll I've seen yet! 🤣
ruggedcobra8 ruggedcobra8 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Jul 2016
#6 ·
Grace Kim80 said:If you keep going down this path, you aren't just going to get this thread locked—you're going to end up with a permanent ban.

I’ve already told you before—don't come in here peddling those "child predator" conspiracy theories—but clearly, you weren't listening. Besides, we aren't some random subreddit where people can just dump nonsense about "bisexual orgies" whenever they feel like it,

Wait, who even are you guys? 🤔
I honestly don't see why there's an issue with someone sharing their theory (no matter how ridiculous it might be) as long as it actually fits within the subforum's rules.

If you ask me, it sounds like you personally just hate the topic, rather than you actually acting in the best interest of the community. ☕
Christian Howard2 Christian Howard2 Member
19 messages
joined Nov 2011
#7 ·
You’ve got your answer, so I’m locking this thread.
If you decide to appeal this again, please just open a new topic without any of the baiting or trolling—let's just stick to the rules, okay?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads