Everything about Donald Trump

I would like to formally request that the moderation team, when circumstances permit, clarify the rationale behind the deletion of my posts. These contributions are entirely factual and composed with decorum, yet they are removed while other entries—which offer inferior, less substantive responses—are permitted to remain as lasting imprints following my reasoned, classical style of argumentation.
The influence of crude and subversive commentary is substantial here, characterized primarily by fundamentally flawed interpretations regarding legal, technical, and sociological matters... though I need not even begin to address the logical fallacies involved.
It should be evident that my grievances extend beyond mere disagreements with the permanent bans imposed by the academic and financial establishments—which are themselves products of this same dysfunctional culture—to include specific moderators who seem to lack any actual expertise in their assigned fields. Time continues to validate my positions, leaving no room for doubt regarding this current matter of the quasi-political persecution of Donald Trump.
Is it possible for the discussion surrounding this

not to also serve as an acceptable response.

It isn't a matter of deleting posts that are "incorrect" or "untruthful." What was removed was the blatant derailment of the conversation into complete nonsense. After twenty-five years of American statehood, with a massive rotation of representatives through nine sessions of US Congress, and having at least two legal experts weigh in to clarify the actual regulations regarding visitor access to the Capitol, you honestly believe you're smarter than everyone else? You actually think this entire issue is trivial and that Donald Trump acted perfectly fine? It’s a bit much, don't you think? A total slaughter of logic that went far beyond the scope of the topic itself.