#1 ·
It seems the entire appeals process has been reduced to nothing more than blatant manipulation. If there were any actual merit to their case, they wouldn't feel the need to hide the registration details or rush to shut down discussions so aggressively.
Even within the most totalitarian and monolithic regimes imaginable, some semblance of evidence is typically presented—even if it is entirely fabricated. What we are witnessing here falls even below that low bar.
Does this pattern of censorship—the deleting of posts and the immediate locking of threads—not suggest something more profound than mere administrative oversight? To me, it feels like an implicit admission of procedural manipulation and a clear indicator of the dishonesty inherent in those who resort to such heavy-handed tactics.
Even within the most totalitarian and monolithic regimes imaginable, some semblance of evidence is typically presented—even if it is entirely fabricated. What we are witnessing here falls even below that low bar.
Does this pattern of censorship—the deleting of posts and the immediate locking of threads—not suggest something more profound than mere administrative oversight? To me, it feels like an implicit admission of procedural manipulation and a clear indicator of the dishonesty inherent in those who resort to such heavy-handed tactics.