#1 ·
Honorable moderators,
Since I suppose I possess rather steady nerves and perhaps an unusually high threshold for frustration, I would like to kindly request that the esteemed administration provide me with a coherent explanation regarding the removal of this specific post from the Politics section:
Since I suppose I possess rather steady nerves and perhaps an unusually high threshold for frustration, I would like to kindly request that the esteemed administration provide me with a coherent explanation regarding the removal of this specific post from the Politics section:
Josipović has mentioned on several occasions that his father withdrew from politics following the collapse of the Prague Spring, but Ivan Zvonimir čičak, a former political prisoner from that era, doesn't quite seem to agree with that particular claim.
According to čičak, Ivo Josipović's father actually experienced a sudden rise in influence after the crackdown on our activists.
Quote:
Ante Josipović served as a key administrator responsible for the purging, arrests, and indictments against those involved in the Prague Spring. It was generally a period of widespread persecution against patriotic figures; during that time, roughly 3,200 people ended up in Communist Party prisons, and over 200,000 were forced out of their jobs.
The news portal also holds a record of a speech delivered by Ante Josipović at Karađorđev, and here is a small excerpt from it:One has to wonder whether we truly learned anything from that discussion with you. That is the real question. Did we act upon your warnings at all, or did we fail to act, or perhaps we acted, but simply not forcefully enough? Determining this is vital, because the conclusions and consequences we draw depend entirely on the answer. I must admit, in my own actions, there was a certain amount of hesitation. For instance, I believe there was hesitancy regarding Đodan and veselica due to varying assessments and judgments about them—a sort of wavering over whether one should step up and how to proceed. I feel that this was unacceptable and ultimately detrimental. We shouldn't have hesitated regarding Đodan and veselica, and I think we could have moved much more decisively. To be fair, following that talk with you, we did take action and pushed our views forward. Admittedly, in that political movement, there were what I consider to be tactical errors... Because it isn't just about Đodan and veselica; the core issue is whether other branches of the Communist Party felt liberated to confront all hostile activities stemming from nationalism, chauvinism, separatism, and other positions opposed to the Communist Party. We worked toward that goal, though perhaps not sufficiently.
I am somewhat confused as to what the issue with this post might be?