#1 ·
I have a question.
Even though this is a private forum where the admins can act however they want—changing rules or moderation styles on a whim whenever it suits them—I still feel the need to ask something.
I just got slapped with a 500-point penalty for hate speech, simply because I dared to question certain historical narratives from back when the US was part of a different federal union.
I shared my view that there isn't sufficient evidence to prove the Nazi Germany puppet regime had a specific "master plan" for extermination, and that the atrocities and crimes committed against the population during their brief rule aren't enough proof to support claims of such a premeditated plan.
Then today, I read this post.
Will the gentleman quoted here get hit with a hate speech penalty for denying truths that apparently can't be questioned on this site, given how the admin team handles things?
To clarify, he also denied the existence of an extermination plan, claiming the regime's policy was to kill one third of the population, forcibly convert another third, and deport the final third from the territory.
Look, if you admins have decided that the absolute truth is that the Nazi Germany regime had a planned extermination policy—unlike your vague claims regarding certain groups during WWII compared to the documented plans involving Jewish people—are you going to penalize posts like his, or is the punishment selective?
Like I said, you can do whatever you want, often inconsistently, while trying to maintain this facade of pluralism and objectivity. So, what's the verdict?
Even though this is a private forum where the admins can act however they want—changing rules or moderation styles on a whim whenever it suits them—I still feel the need to ask something.
I just got slapped with a 500-point penalty for hate speech, simply because I dared to question certain historical narratives from back when the US was part of a different federal union.
I shared my view that there isn't sufficient evidence to prove the Nazi Germany puppet regime had a specific "master plan" for extermination, and that the atrocities and crimes committed against the population during their brief rule aren't enough proof to support claims of such a premeditated plan.
Then today, I read this post.
Will the gentleman quoted here get hit with a hate speech penalty for denying truths that apparently can't be questioned on this site, given how the admin team handles things?
To clarify, he also denied the existence of an extermination plan, claiming the regime's policy was to kill one third of the population, forcibly convert another third, and deport the final third from the territory.
Look, if you admins have decided that the absolute truth is that the Nazi Germany regime had a planned extermination policy—unlike your vague claims regarding certain groups during WWII compared to the documented plans involving Jewish people—are you going to penalize posts like his, or is the punishment selective?
Like I said, you can do whatever you want, often inconsistently, while trying to maintain this facade of pluralism and objectivity. So, what's the verdict?