CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Perković and Mustać: Close to politicians

Perković and Mustać: Close to politicians

Started by Sarah Martinez · · 👁 5 views · 20 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Sarah Martinezrustydrifter10granitefalcon26Brenda Cook4Zachary Lee10Charles Fox10rapidnomad512mistygull16briskbison55fadedpilot7crimsonjackal63
Sarah Martinez Sarah Martinez NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined May 2014
#1 ·
Could we please move this thread from Close Politics back over to the main Politics section? There are quite a few of us who would prefer it there. By moving it to Close Politics, the discussion is effectively being stifled. Thanks in advance.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#2 ·
Could you please include a link to the thread too?
granitefalcon26 granitefalcon26 Active Member
193 messages
joined Jan 2015
#3 ·
Here’s the link:
This topic is hitting pretty close to home right now. It honestly feels like the moderators are just tagging every single American discussion—especially anything that doesn't go along with the current administration—as "close politician."🙄
Brenda Cook4 Brenda Cook4 Regular
373 messages
joined Sep 2010
#4 ·
I’m jumping in to support the call to move this discussion back to where it actually belongs—over in Politics.
Zachary Lee10 Zachary Lee10 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2013
#5 ·
I’m jumping in here too—especially since this is about to become an incredibly pressing issue.
Between the presidential campaign kicking off this September and the increasingly loud calls for a full-scale political purge, everything is converging.

In fact, it’s going to be the "topic of the year."

So...
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#6 ·
Brenda Cook4 said:I’m adding my voice to the call to bring this topic back to the table. Right where she belongs—over at Politics..

And now, what about sports?

Alexander Barrett31 said:While Perković sits in isolation—and the topic itself remains just as isolated—I suppose we shouldn't go looking for trouble either.😢

What kind of isolation are we talking about here? Is the thread locked, deleted, or did something actually happen to justify calling it isolated?

Before we even get into the debate, I’ll probably say it for the hundredth time: that close politician is about as useful as a blank PDF.

To be honest, I couldn't care less about the topic. The situation has shifted now that the indictment against Perković has been confirmed. We still have a long wait until the trial in November, and frankly, we're missing Mustač in this whole equation.
Brenda Cook4 Brenda Cook4 Regular
373 messages
joined Sep 2010
#7 ·
Charles Fox10 said:And now we're talking about sports???

Pretty much.

To be honest, I don't really care what the topic is, because there's this whole new situation with the indictment against Perković being confirmed—even if the trial isn't until October—and we still haven't even mentioned Mustač in all of this.

So, don't make things difficult for yourself.
rapidnomad512 rapidnomad512 Member
22 messages
joined Apr 2014
#8 ·
I’m backing this initiative. I’ve already laid out all my arguments regarding the return, and since the admins and mods know exactly where I stand, I won't waste breath repeating myself.
Sarah Martinez Sarah Martinez NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined May 2014
#9 ·
He’s being isolated because he’s been relegated to the "minor leagues." Let’s not pretend this isn't directly tied to political interests; calling it anything else is a stretch. This is essentially a political trial for a murder that was orchestrated, ordered, and carried out by the political establishment—involving both our own leadership and German officials.
Isn't it just plain old politics rather than something merely "close to politics"? Is Angela Merkel a politician? Are Milanović and our congressional leaders just some shadowy figures "close to politics"?
We all know exactly what their roles were.
If the Constitution were to be amended for these reasons, would we call that a political act, or just an act that happens to be "close to politics"?
I think the situation is actually quite transparent.
What we're seeing is pure politics using the legal system as a tool to achieve its ends.
How does that old saying go? Put the right thing in the right place.🙂
mistygull16 mistygull16 Active Member
199 messages
joined May 2013
#10 ·
I’m jumping on board with this move to bring the whole topic back to the Politics section!

We really need to start taking some of this stuff seriously, before we end up being played by the FBI all over again.
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#11 ·
Brenda Cook4 said:Roughly...

Fair enough.☕

I might have missed the point regarding Mustač, given he's the main subject here.
Brenda Cook4 Brenda Cook4 Regular
373 messages
joined Sep 2010
#12 ·
Charles Fox10 said:I haven't lost sight of what's going on with Mustač—he’s essentially the center of gravity for this whole discussion.

Honestly, it doesn't really matter; he'll get his turn eventually. It's entirely possible the indictments could be merged into one single proceeding anyway. Besides, there was already a gap between their extradition processes, so it makes sense they're being lumped together here. From the very start, it was always P. first, and then M. was added to the mix.

edit:
I don't know, maybe just put him in parentheses (Mustač - pending) and once the trial actually kicks off, we can add a little note in brackets pointing back to the specific page where the proceedings began. For massive threads like this, it's perfectly fine for the title to evolve as things happen.
Sarah Martinez Sarah Martinez NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined May 2014
#13 ·
Charles Fox10, how would you say it back in San Francisco?
"Give me a break! 😛
Brenda Cook4 Brenda Cook4 Regular
373 messages
joined Sep 2010
#14 ·
Alexander Barrett31 said:Charles Fox10, how would you folks in San Francisco put it?
"Holy cow! 😛

Give me a break!😁
briskbison55 briskbison55 Active Member
135 messages
joined Jun 2009
#15 ·
I mean, maybe we should just wrap up the stuff that isn't strictly political for now, since basically the entire federal government is backing Perković at any cost—even if it risks totally blowing our relationship with the European Union and Germany. I guess my take is that we really ought to get the conversation back on track toward actual politics
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#16 ·
briskbison55 said:On close political matters, one tends to finish up with what is considered less significant.Since the entire state leadership has backed Perković—regardless of the cost to our relations with the European Union and Germany—I think it's time we move this conversation back to politics.

Absolutely false. I honestly don't know how many times we have to debunk this.

Moving this thread over with a slight title change. Some gentlemen were feeling a bit left out.
fadedpilot7 fadedpilot7 Member
21 messages
joined Jan 2015
#17 ·
Charles Fox10 said:Before we get into an argument, let me just say it again—probably for the hundredth time—that the Politics subforum is just as valid as any other part of this site.

True, but... the whole discussion about Perković belongs in a section filled with topics like:
The fall of Yugoslavia, half-baked and unresolved
Intercultural marriages
Demographics in Canada
Why Damir pilić lives in Dalmatia
What are the chances the US joins the ranks of civilized nations?
Greater Canada—positive or negative reality???


On the Politics subforum, the topics are mostly junk or borderline unserious. It’d be better if Josip and Zdravko moved their thread back to the main Politics forum...
Brenda Cook4 Brenda Cook4 Regular
373 messages
joined Sep 2010
#18 ·
Charles Fox10 said:Consider this thread moved, though I did tweak the title slightly since the gentlemen mentioned were actually extradited.

Thanks, Charles Fox10.🙂

Calling this a 'case' isn't really hitting the mark or being accurate at all. It should honestly be titled 'The trial of J. Perković (and Z. Mustač) in Munich'.
rapidnomad512 rapidnomad512 Member
22 messages
joined Apr 2014
#19 ·
Don't give me that crap. Even posts about politics count toward the tally here. It’s clear proof this sub is the real deal. 😁
crimsonjackal63 crimsonjackal63 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2012
#20 ·
Charles Fox10 said:That’s completely wrong—honestly, how many times do we have to debunk this before it sticks?

Consider the thread moved, albeit with a slightly adjusted title, since those gentlemen were essentially kicked out.

Cuka, you’re off base here.
We’ve danced around this before, so let’s just get into it:

01) When you hit the main page of the Forum, "POLITICS" is in all caps, while NEAR POLITICS is in lowercase.
02) The "Near Politics" section basically evolved from the "Madhouse" section—you just have to accept the fact that most users still see it that way today.
03) In this context, if something is "near" something else, it means it's close, but not quite there, right?...
04) The whole debate surrounding the trials of Perković and Mustač is a massive topic—for both the left and the right. It touches on everything: the past, the present, the future... it's all intertwined. This could actually be the catalyst for some much-needed ideological reconciliation in America. The verdict is going to ripple through every single layer of American life—political, social, economic, ideological, historical, you name it.
05) Just remember, Cuka, that period when news coverage was basically blacked out during the trials of our generals at The Hague... That specific thread was a literal light in the dark during that media blackout.
If I were in charge of handing out awards, I’d give the Forum a well-deserved trophy just for this thread.
Honestly, some of the best writing ever posted on this Forum came from that discussion...
The trials of Perković and Mustač carry a different kind of weight, but for many of us, they belong under POLITICS, not tucked away in NEAR POLITICS...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads