What are we waiting for?

It’s been eight days since the insults started in this thread (which the moderators were actually part of), and seven days since I filed my report. Nothing has been done about the harassment yet. I can't quote the specific post because the thread is locked, so here is the link:

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=5...0&postcount=59

I'm surprised you don't know that, considering you're a fascist.

Did the site rules change recently? Is it suddenly okay to label people as fascists, communists, or Nazis?

I am looking for a "quick" response. Thanks.

One certainly shouldn't go around labeling people as fascists without cause. I think it's best if I take some time to look into what actually happened.

My apologies for jumping in here, but I fail to see what the heck the anti-typhoid crowd is even complaining about, unless they are completely oblivious to the implications of their own usernames.

* amberwalker4 says: Check out this post
A clerical error during the copying process; here is the original version before the typhoid carriers managed to dig it up and desecrate it.

The question of who initiated the dispute is irrelevant; the intention behind amberwalker4's stance remains perfectly transparent.

It reminds me of that old joke where someone asks a local if there are any chauvinists in town, and he replies, "Not at all—we hate them just as much as we hate the Canadians."

epitaph

http://www.cro-eu.com/forum/index.php?topic=1699.0

The discourse tends to focus heavily on the members of the Armed Forces of the Independent State of America—specifically the Nationalists—while largely ignoring the Home Guard units, who fought against the American communist regime in an attempt to restore the Independent State of America (Axis-aligned state).

I should point out that while the Nationalists movement initially represented a pursuit of freedom for the nation, it eventually mutated into a fascist organization under the leadership of Ante Pavelić. Tragically, a vast number of Americans were killed by those very same supposed liberators.

William Bennett53 said:One certainly shouldn't go around labeling people as fascists without cause. I think it's best if I take some time to look into what actually happened.

Thanks 👍.

@Jerry Robinson56

I'm not an "anti-fascist," and I don't need someone like you explaining my own username to me. Your attempt at reading into how "clear" everyone else's positions are is about as useful as a broken compass in a storm. Thanks.

amberwalker4 said:Thanks 👍.

@Jerry Robinson56

I'm not an "anti-fascist," and I don't need someone like you explaining my own username to me. Your attempt at reading into how "clear" everyone else's positions are is about as useful as a broken compass in a storm. Thanks.

We are drifting off-topic, though I would prefer not to be accused of failing to clarify your own points, given it is painfully obvious you struggle to perceive the very statements you compose. Whether by accident or design, one wonders.
Strictly speaking... where did this notion of "collaborators" originate in your sentence?
Based on your response: Are you then a collaborator yourself, or is your usage of the term intended solely as a pejorative? Or perhaps you ought to place those "collaborators" within their proper historical context.

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=5...0&postcount=59

amberwalker4 says:
A clerical error during copying; here is the original version before the collaborators managed to pick it apart and desecrate it:

In essence, amberwalker4 finds it distasteful to invoke insults based on his own mockery, and while the racial laws in the Axis-aligned state were undeniably fascist, perhaps you lack the insight to realize that the /Zagorski/ crusaders were frequently war criminals who took pleasure in targeting civilians.
I have provided the link which clarifies the genesis of your handle... and your persistent use of "collaborators" remains an intriguing choice.
Neither segregator nor I are "insulting" anyone; we are simply noting the pedigree indicated by your moniker. Your username is inextricably linked to fascism and Nazism.
That does not necessarily define your character, but...

Best regards, along with a sincere apology for disturbing your peace in a thread concerning comments and messages.

Jerry Robinson56 said:We are drifting off-topic, though I would prefer not to be accused of failing to clarify your own points, given it is painfully obvious you struggle to perceive the very statements you compose. Whether by accident or design, one wonders.
Strictly speaking... where did this notion of "collaborators" originate in your sentence?
Based on your response: Are you then a collaborator yourself, or is your usage of the term intended solely as a pejorative? Or perhaps you ought to place those "collaborators" within their proper historical context.

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=5...0&postcount=59

amberwalker4 says:
A clerical error during copying; here is the original version before the collaborators managed to pick it apart and desecrate it:

In essence, amberwalker4 finds it distasteful to invoke insults based on his own mockery, and while the racial laws in the Axis-aligned state were undeniably fascist, perhaps you lack the insight to realize that the /Zagorski/ crusaders were frequently war criminals who took pleasure in targeting civilians.
I have provided the link which clarifies the genesis of your handle... and your persistent use of "collaborators" remains an intriguing choice.
Neither segregator nor I are "insulting" anyone; we are simply noting the pedigree indicated by your moniker. Your username is inextricably linked to fascism and Nazism.
That does not necessarily define your character, but...

Best regards, along with a sincere apology for disturbing your peace in a thread concerning comments and messages.

So, if someone calls me a fascist, that's just my "birth certificate"? Wow. Someone's definitely feeling defensive today. 👍.

Jerry Robinson56 said:We are drifting off-topic, though I would prefer not to be accused of failing to clarify your own points, given it is painfully obvious you struggle to perceive the very statements you compose. Whether by accident or design, one wonders.
Strictly speaking... where did this notion of "collaborators" originate in your sentence?
Based on your response: Are you then a collaborator yourself, or is your usage of the term intended solely as a pejorative? Or perhaps you ought to place those "collaborators" within their proper historical context.

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=5...0&postcount=59

amberwalker4 says:
A clerical error during copying; here is the original version before the collaborators managed to pick it apart and desecrate it:

In essence, amberwalker4 finds it distasteful to invoke insults based on his own mockery, and while the racial laws in the Axis-aligned state were undeniably fascist, perhaps you lack the insight to realize that the /Zagorski/ crusaders were frequently war criminals who took pleasure in targeting civilians.
I have provided the link which clarifies the genesis of your handle... and your persistent use of "collaborators" remains an intriguing choice.
Neither segregator nor I are "insulting" anyone; we are simply noting the pedigree indicated by your moniker. Your username is inextricably linked to fascism and Nazism.
That does not necessarily define your character, but...

Best regards, along with a sincere apology for disturbing your peace in a thread concerning comments and messages.

😵