Politics/World Moderation: Ukraine Thread #5

Man, this is like the second time I’ve been flagged for posting the exact same thing in the Politics/World/Ukraine section. Seriously? That's five strikes already. Honestly, someone needs to come in here and clean house on that thread because things are getting messy.

Look, to get where I'm coming from, I gotta point out that there’s this small group of people who just won't shut up. For months now, it’s been the same old broken record. They keep pushing this exact same mantra, over and over, claiming the situation in Ukraine is basically a carbon copy of what we dealt with back home in America. They’re out here insisting that the pro-Maidan forces are just like the Americans right before the war broke out, and that the anti-Maidan side is the direct equivalent of the Mexican Chetniks. They go on and on about how Russia is just a mirror image of Milošević's Mexico, or that Putin = Milošević. It's constant. Just endless repetition.

Man, this thread has five different parts now, which means we’re looking at nearly 50,000 posts from all sorts of random people. It’s wild. Thousands upon thousands of times, the same crowd has just chanted that same old mantra over and over again. And then, thousands upon thousands of times right back, other people have shut them down, offered totally different takes, or even came up with better ways to look at things by comparing it to the domestic wars or what was happening in the States and Canada back in the early 90s—or even stuff happening elsewhere in the world. Honestly, I’ve even started two other separate threads because it’s so obvious that the vast majority of people here don't buy into that mindset at all.

And yet, here we go again. It’s like a broken record! These same people just keep chanting the exact same mantra over and over. They keep clogging up the thread with these identical claims that have zero basis in reality. It isn't even about facts at this point—it's just their pure, unadulterated opinion, which has been debunked a million times already. Seriously!

Since it’s pretty clear that everyone’s just letting these people voice their "opinions," I figured I’d use the exact same tactic. So, here's my two cents: that whole pro-Western crowd? Honestly, they're nothing more than a bunch of drugged-up cannibals and creeps. There, I said it.

First timer here!

Original Post:
I can't believe we're actually talking about this again. Seriously, people need to wake up! It’s like everyone is just sleepwalking through history while everything shifts right under our feet. You see these headlines and you think, "Oh, that's just more noise," but it isn't. It really isn't. Jack Cook7 is totally spot on with what they said earlier, too. I was reading through the thread and honestly, if you don't see where this is heading, you aren't paying attention. We're looking at a massive shift in how the whole world operates, and most folks are too busy scrolling through their feeds to notice the cracks forming in the foundation. It's wild, man. Just wild. Everything feels so much more volatile lately, doesn't it? One day it's one thing, the next day the entire landscape has changed. We gotta stay sharp. Don't let the distractions get to you!

Jack Cook7 said:Look, you gotta realize that despite all the constant bickering and noise we see online, the good old-fashioned democracy is still out there doing its thing in the West. It’s happening.

I can't believe I just watched that. Seriously, my brain is kind of melting right now. You guys have to see this clip—it’s wild! It hits on so many things we've been talking about lately regarding how everything in the world is shifting so fast. Honestly, it's a bit overwhelming if you think about it too long. Just a total trip. What do you all think though? Is it just me, or is this getting crazy?

Man, that prosecutor's office building is just... wow. It’s huge. Seriously, you look at it and you can tell they aren't playing around over there. Just massive.

Jack Cook7
When are the drugged-up cannibals and creeps finally gonna show up?

Rock: You just scored 35 points on this violation, which means you might be looking at a temporary lockout until the timer runs out. Just a heads up—the heavy-duty stuff stays on your record forever.

That’s the second time today I’ve seen it. Another guy on here who’s been posting the exact same thing for months—hundreds of times now—just constantly hammering on with that "Russians = Chetniks" line.

Original Post:
I can't believe people are still arguing about this! Honestly, some folks just love to hear themselves talk. They sit there acting like they know everything about how things work in America, but let’s be real—most of them couldn't lead a dog on a leash, let alone navigate actual politics. It’s always the same loop, too. Someone says something half-baked, and then everyone jumps in to tear them apart without actually offering a single useful thought. It’s exhausting! I was reading through some of these threads earlier and man, the ego on some of these guys is off the charts. You see someone like Jack Cook7 trying to make a point, and suddenly it’s a total circus. Anyway, my rant is over. I'm just saying, maybe if we spent less time fighting over nothing and more time actually looking at the facts, we wouldn't be in this mess. But hey, what do I know, right? Just my two cents!

Jack Cook7 said:Oh man, seriously...
Honestly, you don't even have to dig that deep. Just listen to how these pro-Russia types talk and compare it to that old-school, ultra-nationalist rhetoric from the nineties... it’s basically the exact same playbook. Same vibe, different era.
If things are supposedly so different, then why does the rhetoric sound exactly the same? It’s wild, right?

Jack Cook7
And what about the rhetoric coming from those drug-addled, cannibalistic, pedophilic Nazi reps?

Result: calm down: This violation is worth 20 points and could get you banned from the site until it runs out. Heavy-duty infractions? Those stay on your record forever.

=========================

So, I gotta ask: what’s actually the deal here? What’s the difference between my take and what those two other posters are saying? I’ve laid out my opinion twice now, and I get slapped with a ban both times. Meanwhile, they—and honestly, everyone else like them—can repeat the exact same stuff hundreds of times (or thousands when you count all their arguments with other people) and nobody says a word! Seriously, what are the rules even based on?

If someone keeps insisting that their take on things is just "their opinion," then honestly? They’re full of it. Like, seriously. You can't just wrap any old nonsense in the "it's just my opinion" flag and expect people to buy it. It’s such a lazy way to dodge being called out when you're clearly just pushing an agenda. I see this all the time online—people throwing around wild claims and then acting all innocent like they're just sharing a little thought. Give me a break!

Those anti-war types? They're basically just modern-day insurgents.
Russia = Greater Mexico
Putin = Milošević
Putin = Hitler

I can't even begin to process this. Just... wow. Total madness!

So, what’s actually the difference when I’m just asking a question versus when I’m straight-up making a claim? Like, what's the deal there?

So, when are these "defenders of Western democratic values" finally gonna stop talking and actually start acting like total psychos? Seriously, when does the madness begin?

Man, the way those radical extremists are talking right now? It’s seriously chilling. Honestly, their rhetoric is so twisted, it sounds just like the garbage coming out of the mouths of those drugged-out, cannibalistic, pedophile Nazi psychos. It’s scary how similar they are.

Look, my reasoning on both counts is actually pretty straightforward:

It was all driven by this one big idea that...

Those self-proclaimed "defenders of Western values" they sent into Syria and Afghanistan? Total jokes. Honestly, just a bunch of cannibals and junkies. I mean, look at the heroin epidemic in Afghanistan—it’s everywhere you go whenever the US decides to step in and "intervene." It's a complete mess.

I mean, come on... you really think those Western media outlets and politicians are actually standing up for anyone? Please. They’re just paying them off to keep the script running. It's all just a pay-to-play game at this point.

Basically, everything in (2) was driven by that same logic—except for (1), obviously. It's all about that core idea.

Some of those "protesters" down at the rally were out there waving Nazi symbols, which pretty much tells you everything you need to know. Like, okay, so they clearly don't have an issue with Nazism. It's right there in plain sight.

Man, it feels like you can't scroll through the news without hitting another massive pedophilia scandal out of the West lately. I mean, look at the Saville thing or that whole Smith mess—it’s getting ridiculous. It honestly feels like these cases are just popping up everywhere these days. Just one after another.

Man, it’s like the Western media and politicians are still out there playing favorites, sticking up for those same old reps because they're basically on the payroll. It's all just one big pay-to-play scheme, honestly.

So what’s the deal if I drop my two cents twice and get slapped with a penalty both times, while other people spout the exact same "valid" opinions thousands of times? It’s wild! We’ve got people spamming the same old mantra over and over, and even though we—and the mods too, during the actual debate—keep flagging them and sending warnings, they just keep right on going. Like, seriously, how does that even work?

Look, if you’re gonna be all strict and start sanctioning me just for sharing my take—especially since the ratio is sitting at 2/2—then fine, go ahead and come after the thousands of other users posting the exact same stuff. If that's how we're playing it. Otherwise, I'd love an actual explanation from the mods, like Rock and Bubi Mir. Honestly, though? I’d much rather hear a breakdown from the rest of the mod team and the big bosses running this show.

This whole thread has basically turned into a playground for a few certain people who just love hearing themselves talk. It’s the same exact loop, over and over again. Honestly, it’s less like a discussion and more like a megaphone for the same mainstream media outlets and power structures that are constantly spinning the news out of Ukraine. They just keep pushing the same distorted narrative, and now this thread is just helping them do it.

Honestly, most of these forum trolls are just straight-up propaganda machines. They’re constantly playing on that old wound—trying to trigger Americans by bringing up all that historical trauma from the war years. It's not even about facts or actual proof at this point. They just loop the same tired mantra over and over again, specifically designed to hit an average American right where it hurts. They take all that deep-seated frustration from the War of Independence and try to pin it directly onto the people they hate. It's such a cheap tactic.

Look, it’s just an opinion. Or maybe a "so-called" opinion that's been debunked a thousand times already. But even if it isn't, it's still just a dissenting view—and honestly? Every single one of those views is EQUALLY VALUABLE. And more importantly, they are all EQUALLY NON-PUNISHABLE. Period.

Maybe it’s finally time to call it quits on this whole approach. I mean, look, I know everyone’s coming from a good place—trying to do right by Ukraine and stuff like that—but honestly? It’s starting to mess with how this entire Politics forum actually functions.

Is my take just somehow less valid? Or maybe my facts aren't hitting as hard as what the other guys on here are dropping? I feel like I’ve been spelling it out and giving a thousand warnings, over and over again, but maybe I'm just missing something!

So, I’m looking for some input here. What do you guys think?

P.S. Honestly, nobody has actually called me out or even tried to argue with my take on those "high on their own supply" types who claim to be the ultimate defenders of Western democratic values. Not one person.

Jack Cook7 said:So now I’m asking: what’s actually the difference between my take and what these two forum members are saying?

Are you being serious right now, or are you just messing with me?
I stated that the rhetoric used by Russian propagandists is terrifyingly similar to the rhetoric used by white supremacists back in the early nineties. That is my opinion, and I have an absolute right to hold it. Anyone who compares those two styles of speech can't really conclude anything else—they lead to the same place. And your response to that is to bring up some supporters of pedophiles?!? Who exactly are we talking about here? Who is the pedophile and who is the supporter?!?

You and people like the Fireboat crew just throw around these kinds of stupid accusations, and then when someone finally gets sanctioned for it, you all start whining about freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech definitely doesn't include accusing one person of being a pedophile and labeling another person as their supporter. If it were up to me, someone making claims like that should get a permanent ban. Unless, of course, you actually prove who the pedophile is and who is supporting them.

Charles Gomez said:Are you actually being serious right now, or just messing with me?
I said the pro-Russian rhetoric and the rhetoric used by those ultra-nationalist thugs back in the early nineties are terrifyingly similar—which is my opinion, I have every right to it. Anyone comparing those two rhetorics can only come to one conclusion: they’re the same thing. And your response is to bring up some supporters of pedophiles?!? Who exactly is supposed to be the pedophile here, and who is the supporter?!?

You and the crowd like redheron30 throw around this kind of stupidity, and then when someone finally calls it out, there's all this whining about freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech definitely doesn't cover accusing people of being pedophiles or being their supporters. If you asked me, someone pulling that should get a permanent ban. Unless, of course, you can actually prove who the pedophile is and who is backing them.

Pedophiles? There was a health manual released for parents of newborns in Germany that actually encouraged fathers to stimulate their daughters' clitorises from infancy to ensure "proper" sexual development.

Pedophiles?

What haven't we seen on CNN or Fox News, Charles Gomez? 🙂

redheron30 said:Pedophiles? I mean, there was this health manual released over in Germany for parents of newborns, where they actually encourage fathers to freely stimulate their daughters' clitorises from a very young age just to ensure proper sexual development.

Pedophiles?

What else haven't we seen on CNN or Fox News, Charles Gomez? 🙂

?
What is that supposed to mean, exactly? So because someone published some kind of handbook, everyone in that group is suddenly a pedophile? Just spare me that kind of moronic logic.

Look, this isn't the spot for us to just bicker amongst ourselves.

What we really need to be talking about is the MODERATION CRITERIA AND THE EQUAL RIGHT TO AN OPINION.

So, if we've got viewpoints like:

(1) being against the movement = being a war criminal, Putin = Milošević, Hitler, etc., basically acting as "representatives of pro-Russian/anti-European/anti-Western/anti-American values"

(2) supporting the movement = being some drugged-out, Nazi cannibal, acting as "representatives of pro-European/pro-Western/pro-American values"

then we’re looking at a pure case of banning and punishing one side while letting the other slide.

As someone who stands against viewpoint (1), I’ve explained a hundred times why (1) just isn't grounded in reality, in my book. Yet, those pushing those views haven't been penalized once—not even me for debunking them! Other users have done it thousands of times too, despite warnings that they're cluttering the thread with nonsense or offensive junk.

But as an advocate for viewpoint (2), I’ve been punished TWICE, even though nobody bothered to check if that view was actually justified or not. And honestly, the facts showing that supporters of those "Western values" are exactly that kind of mess can be found in the news almost every single day.

If the war criminals get a pass, then the cannibals should too.

So, where's the line? Is it just the moderators?

Charles Gomez said:?
What exactly is that supposed to mean? Someone released some handbook and now everyone in the military is suddenly a predator? Spare me that idiotic logic.

It means exactly this: the West is constantly pushing one sick, socially destructive, anti-human ideology that’s meant to eventually go mainstream. Nothing more, nothing less.

You and people like you are just fueling that process—feeling all progressive about it, whether you realize it or not.

Jack Cook7 said:So, what exactly is the difference?

If you weren't such a troll, you’d probably see the massive distinction between calling someone a pedophile and simply comparing two different styles of rhetoric.
I know I'll likely get banned for this, but I just can't help myself because you are honestly taking this trolling way too far.

Go ahead, though. Keep on trolling and acting like you "don't understand" where the line is.

It’s honestly hard not to see the parallels between what happened back in '90 and what we’re seeing now in Ukraine.

I mean, think about it—back then, you had Victoria Nuland showing up alongside the Clinton Foundation to support our defenders, handing out sandwiches and making sure we were equipped with the absolute latest American gear—not to mention all that behind-the-scenes backing from the CIA and other intelligence agencies. Meanwhile, the opposition and the US Army were hit with an arms embargo.

As for the Rock moderator, if you want the real scoop on what’s happening in Russia, you can just ask his buddy in Moscow—he'll give you the most accurate intel possible. And his friend Lyudmila over in Kyiv? She’s just as reliable when it comes to telling you exactly what’s going on on the ground there. If you dare to disagree with him, you can bet you'll end up with a strike.

redheron30 said:What you're actually saying is that there’s this sick, anti-human ideology being pushed constantly in the West, an ideology that’s supposedly meant to become the mainstream one day. Nothing more, nothing less.

People like you, and others who think just like you, are basically just fueling that whole process while patting yourselves on the back for being so progressive. Whether you realize it or not, I guess.

It’s honestly hilarious when people like you try to convince everyone that society is trying to force pedophilia on us as if it were normal. It’s like you think people in the West are just animals instead of actual human beings. As if some German woman isn't a mother like anyone else, but somehow she’s out there chasing pedophilia...

It’s pretty interesting how none of this seems to bother you when it comes to our own church, where they punish their own pedophiles with something as minor as a 10% pension cut. And the guy even lives right there in their facility. Heck, they could probably hold Mass in the same building.

Look, just because there were five Chetniks over in Crimea doesn't mean the whole anti-Maidan crowd are all Chetniks.

If we’re playing by those rules, though...

If you claim the entire movement is made up of Chetniks just because five guys in Crimea are rooting for Russia, then sure—by that logic, if you find five pedophiles, Nazis, cannibals, or junkies on the other side or among their spokespeople, you could label the whole Maidan movement the exact same way.

Bottom line? This is all about the right to free speech.

Jack Cook7 said:Even those against the uprising aren't all extremists. Even if there were five radicals in Crimea.

Following that exact same logic, then:

If having five radicals in Crimea who support Russia means we have to label the entire anti-uprising movement as extremist, then I guess it would only take five pedophiles, Nazis, cannibals, or junkies on the other side—or even just among their representatives—to label the whole uprising movement the same way.

So, I suppose WE ARE DEALING WITH A MATTER OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH HERE.

Where exactly did you quote someone saying the entire anti-uprising movement was composed of extremists?
From what I can see, you just quoted me, and that post has absolutely nothing to do with what you’re talking about now. I don't think even you know what you're trying to say.

Look, I pretty much laid it all out in the bottom part of my first post, and honestly? That’s basically the TL;DR for thousands upon thousands of comments on this whole topic.

Charles Gomez said:It’s honestly hilarious watching people like you try to convince everyone that society is trying to force pedophilia on us as if it’s normal. As if people in the West are just animals instead of actual humans. Like, some woman from Germany isn't just a regular mom—she’s out there trying to push pedophilia...

Funny how you don't seem bothered by the fact that our church punishes its own pedophiles with nothing more than a 10% pension cut. Oh, and the guy is still living in their housing. They could practically hold mass in his living room.

Pedophilia is just one branch of these unnatural practices they're trying to shove down our throats.

We actually have something in common, Charles Gomez. We're both skeptics. You're a skeptic of the truth; I'm a skeptic of lies.

And thanks for providing the perfect practical example of the methodology I mentioned earlier. An inevitable attack on the church—which, let's face it, is currently being smeared through an unprecedented media campaign. This church offers society way more tangible, everyday value than any neoliberal doctrine ever could. Not saying they do it collectively, though.

Btw, I'm an agnostic. But I can see from space how you just resonate with anything that fits into your specific little boxes—your only criterion seems to be whether it disagrees with your opinion.

Jack Cook7 said:Everything I just said was right there at the bottom of my first post, and honestly, it's just a summary of the thousands of comments already on this thread.

What exactly was stated? Where did I ever say that anti-war protesters were Chetniks?
I guess you could try to disprove my point—that pro-Russian rhetoric sounds suspiciously like the old extremist rhetoric from the early nineties (all that talk about "unarmed people," being under threat, fascists, foreign mercenaries... one only needs to recall what happened in San Francisco regarding the Arab threat)—but your trolling about pedophiles doesn't even need a response. It isn't an opinion; it’s clearly just provocation intended to accuse someone of supporting pedophilia.

Look, I don't need to sit here and defend myself. Everything’s already been laid out a thousand times over, and honestly, the arguments I’ve made are just as solid—if not more so—than anything else being said.

My point is simple: if YOUR take on this is considered acceptable by the mods, then MY take should be too.
Or maybe it just isn't.

But seriously, if YOU and your buddies keep posting your views over and over without getting flagged, why am I the one constantly getting hit for consistently sharing MY own views? Especially when my points are backed up by actual facts.

That is, assuming being factually correct even matters when it comes to freedom of speech.

So, I’m calling on the moderators, supermods, and admins here. Give me the actual rulebook for expressing opinions on this forum—specifically in the Politics section, and specifically regarding this whole mess.