How long does it take for the site to be back up?

@ex anais, is it actually true that out of those 80 posts on that thread, 50 of them were mine?
And did they go ahead and delete my 50 posts too?
Of course it’s a lie. It’s incredibly easy to fact-check.
Why do you expect me to just sit here and swallow a lie, when at the very same time, you act like it’s absolutely vital to correct whatever you personally deem a falsehood over in the neighboring thread?
It must be so critical that you went out of your way to write a massive wall of text on that topic.
Should everyone else just not care?

So, don't go accusing people of lying; that kind of thing won't fly on Zuzach.

We aren't on Zuzach right now. We are on Reddit, and the lie is written right here. You know it's a lie. So why on earth are you defending it?
Since when am I denied the right to correct inaccurate information about myself?

There is a distinction between making a suggestion, a proposal, a compromise, and a demand—you have to make it because I told you to. I don't care if you're a moderator. That's not how this works.

Hmm. I never claimed any of that.
I didn't demand anything.
I didn't report anyone.
Nor did I hide behind some "official ruling." Did I comment that I was complaining? No, I didn't.
So why are you even directing all of this at me?

I fail to see any reason to prolong this debate.
The complaints have been filed, the moderators have weighed in, and the claimants simply cannot reach an agreement. At this stage, I believe we should just wait for a higher authority to rule on the matter.

boldwalker12 said:If the mods want to weigh in on this, go ahead. Moderation already laid it all out for you and Dog, who keeps trying to turn a single warning about staying away from Good's story into some massive ZUD case.

I haven't really jumped into this thread until now since everything seemed pretty clearly explained, but I guess I should say something just so I'm not ignoring it. Specifically, the moderators have warned users multiple times not to circle back to Good. There’s already been plenty said about him and his example; he was really just the spark for a useful discussion that moved past him. It seems like a waste to keep dragging the conversation back to whether Good is lying or trolling. We don't exactly have much patience for trolls over at ZUD anyway.

Also, there have been a few too many attempts lately by users on ZUD to pressure the moderators into policing things based on personal preference or to get rid of people they disagree with. We aren't going to moderate based on what someone wants, and we aren't removing users just because they get under someone's skin. I hope that's clear, because maybe it wasn't before.

That's all I have to say about it.