CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Politics doesn't belong on ZK - remove the thread about the Men and Women's Community

Politics doesn't belong on ZK - remove the thread about the Men and Women's Community

Started by Chloe Roberts2 · · 👁 5 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Chloe Roberts2Ryan Vaughn7Patrick Bailey4Dennis Jackson38Thomas Barrett84electricjackal55Brandon Lopez6Susan Price30James Patel20rustydrifter10
Chloe Roberts2 Chloe Roberts2 Active MemberOP
75 messages
joined Apr 2015
#1 ·
Every single time I check this thread, it’s nothing but endless trolling, bans, moderator warnings, Tito, Christmas, Jesus, religion, and all those religious arguments...

It honestly feels like this topic just melts people's brains, and if you ask me, we should probably just lock this thing down or delete it entirely.
Ryan Vaughn7 Ryan Vaughn7 Active Member
154 messages
joined Jul 2009
#2 ·
Chloe Roberts2 said:Every single time this thread pops up, it’s just a mess of bans, moderator warnings, Tito, Christmas, Jesus, religion, and religious debates...

Please, just move this over to politics. We're dying of boredom over here.
Patrick Bailey4 Patrick Bailey4 Active Member
72 messages
joined May 2014
#3 ·
The real issue here is that this specific topic keeps popping up across a huge variety of different PDF threads on the forum.
It’s clearly a calculated attempt at ideological propaganda, spreading it across as many different corners of the site as possible.
Of course, all these kinds of threads really ought to be scrubbed from the boards. Politics belongs strictly within the Politics section, period. But we all know that won't happen—because if they actually cleaned it up, they wouldn't be able to push their agenda anymore.
Dennis Jackson38 Dennis Jackson38 Member
34 messages
joined Feb 2011
#4 ·
Ideological propaganda, sure.

Lest we somehow fall into the trap of believing this is actually a pressing contemporary issue regarding fundamental human liberties—liberties that ought to extend to all segments of society, including the rights and agency of women.

Heaven forbid we ever think that far.
Patrick Bailey4 Patrick Bailey4 Active Member
72 messages
joined May 2014
#5 ·
Exactly, we’re on the same page here.
But does that mean she belongs on various subreddits, just like any other major current issue? Of course not.

There are plenty of other factors at play. The topic itself is excessive and, frankly, it’s proven to trigger unnecessary conflict and division. Plus, the moderators on different forums—including ZK—are chosen (as Nica herself pointed out) without any real proof that they actually understand American politics. There’s a high chance they aren't even equipped to moderate discussions of this caliber.

They aren't even from the Politics section, but that's a whole different conversation.
Thomas Barrett84 Thomas Barrett84 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2010
#6 ·
Why would we move this thread? 🤷
It’s relevant, and honestly, it’s hitting people from every direction right now, so why wouldn't it belong here on ZK?
Sure, everyone has an opinion and people are split—that’s just how it works. It’s the same thing you see in food criticism, professional sports, or high fashion. You get into a debate, some folks who get a little too heated head for the exits, while those who can handle the heat stay put. I don't see the issue. 🤷

@Patrick Bailey4/">@@Patrick Bailey4, am I reading you right? Are you actually expecting moderators on a politics forum to be partisan hacks? Like, should we have MLS players moderating sports discussions or Nobel laureates running the literary boards?
electricjackal55 electricjackal55 Member
10 messages
joined Nov 2011
#7 ·
Patrick Bailey4 said:The absolute worst part about this is how the same topic keeps popping up across a ton of different subforums here.
It’s clearly just ideological propaganda being spread everywhere they can reach.
Obviously, all those threads should be wiped out—I mean, politics belongs strictly in the Politics section, period—but that’s never going to happen because then they wouldn't be able to push their agenda so blatantly.

not, but more like Hollywood 😳
Brandon Lopez6 Brandon Lopez6 Regular
656 messages
joined Feb 2010
#8 ·
I'm with Hannah Thomas18 on this one—no idea why we're even talking about moving the thread. I don't post a ton, but honestly, I'd much rather hang out in this section of ZK than over in Politics. ZK is basically a giant melting pot for everything anyway; if you started scattering all these topics into other subforums, there wouldn't be much left worth reading here.
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#9 ·
Elizabeth Davis said:I'm with Hannah Thomas18 on this—I don't see any reason to move the thread. I don't post constantly, but I'd much rather discuss this here on ZK than over in Politics. ZK is basically a melting pot for everything anyway; if you moved half these topics to other subforums, there wouldn't be much left worth reading.

Wait, didn't the mods just recently post on PZK saying there was already an old, standing rule against discussing politics on ZK? That was back when they were setting up some of the newer guidelines, right?😉

Maybe that's why...
Brandon Lopez6 Brandon Lopez6 Regular
656 messages
joined Feb 2010
#10 ·
Susan Price30 said:Wait, didn't some of the mods just post on the PZK saying there was already an old rule stating you can't talk politics on the ZK? I think they mentioned it when those newer rules were being rolled out.😉

Maybe that’s why...

The thread was opened ages ago (if I recall right, it was even pulled from the misterij section), so moving it now wouldn't really make any sense. Politics is off-limits—meaning you can't go in on Democrats vs. Republicans, Biden, Trump, or anyone else from the old school parties—but talking about gay rights is fair game. Besides, this whole referendum thing started with a group of regular people, not as some calculated political move. To me, there's a massive difference between commenting on what a politician did and discussing this topic.🤷.
James Patel20 James Patel20 Active Member
53 messages
joined Jan 2012
#11 ·
Since we’re already hanging out in the women’s corner of the forum, I happened to stumble upon this



So, according to what the admin said, the phrase "It's not the gays' fault your life sucks" doesn't actually count as an insult...

Which really makes me wonder, could I just go ahead and add this to my profile signature: "It's not the national referendum's fault your life sucks."

I would truly appreciate an answer on that whenever someone has a moment...
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#12 ·
Look, I’m not trying to be offensive here, but like I mentioned to the user who originally posted it, it definitely comes across as trolling. On JLL, we tend to be a lot more laid-back about trolling compared to most other subreddits or forums out there. In a lot of other online communities, a post like that would have gotten you instantly banned.

Moving back to the topic at hand: this thread is staying up on JLL for now.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads