CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › What are the moderation criteria? - Chuck

What are the moderation criteria? - Chuck

Started by Bradley Scott2 · · 👁 6 views · 23 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Bradley Scott2Charles Fox10Charles Wells71Harold Walker44Sean Cook2mistymason1
Charles Wells71 Charles Wells71 Member
39 messages
joined Jun 2013
#21 ·
Honestly, I’m wondering the same thing as everyone else regarding FedEx. Why is there such a massive double standard here?!
I mean, if FedEx can just throw around English insults calling someone a little b*tch, why am I suddenly the villain for calling him a total wimp?

Am I really "disgusting" just because I'm demanding that the rules apply to everyone equally?
mistymason1 mistymason1 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2012
#22 ·
Ashley Rodriguez20 said:I’m wondering about this too, and not just regarding FedEx. Why aren't the standards consistent?
If FedEx can call someone a little bitch in English, why shouldn't I be allowed to call him a wimp?

Why am I being labeled disgusting? Just because I want everyone held to the same standard, I guess.

As far as I'm concerned, I'd allow pretty much any kind of insults. This isn't some dive bar where you end up with a broken jaw over a comment. 😂

Personally, I think calling someone a wimp is fine. I wouldn't even take it as an insult. Maybe just a slight jab at my masculinity. 😉
Charles Wells71 Charles Wells71 Member
39 messages
joined Jun 2013
#23 ·
mistymason1 said:Look, if you ask me, I’d let pretty much any kind of trash talk fly. This isn't some dive bar where people are actually gonna end up with broken teeth over an insult. 😂

Personally, being called a wimp doesn't even phase me—I wouldn't take it as an insult at all, though back in the day, it used to be a tiny little jab at my ego. 😉

man, you see? the forum isn't being moderated by my rules or yours, and honestly, I don't give a damn if you call me a total pushover, just let me be able to dish it right back to you and everyone else! it’s always about this one thing and nothing else!

Just apply the same rules to everyone.
Bradley Scott2 Bradley Scott2 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Jul 2014
#24 ·
mistymason1 said:Bradley Scott2 wasn't complaining, he was just asking why the criteria are inconsistent. I already told him he's being a bit naive—someone smart should realize how things work, and honestly, by looking for justice, he's just showing his own weakness.

I’m definitely not being naive here.
I know there's basically zero chance of getting a card overturned.
But having solid arguments for an appeal still carries some weight.
More importantly, it shuts down the argument of "why didn't you appeal?"
Well, I did.

This whole appeal thing is a habit I picked up in my real life dealing with government bureaucracy. I always present them with facts that make them trip over their own feet. By the time I walk into their office, they're usually sweating.😁 Sometimes I can shut them down with a single letter—not even an official appeal, more like a warning—that forces them to fix the issue immediately.
It's a bit of a tangent, but it's just to show I'm not clueless.

The naive ones are the women on these forums who think feminism is actually going to do them any favors.
Also, this site might want to consider opening a dedicated Manosphere subforum before someone else does and everyone starts migrating there.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads