Double standards!

Richard Patel21 said:It happens that certain comments pass through without being penalized.
I disagree with the notion that we are selective when it comes to moderation.

You certainly are not. As of now, one can only say the best things about you. There is no reason to lie. However, it has been proven countless times that Sugar and the rest of the team are selective. We have opened specific threads in the past that were simply ignored by the administration.

Morgan Carter said:You definitely aren't. So far, there’s nothing bad to say about you—honestly, you're one of the good ones. But the fact that the Sugar crew and their buddies are the only ones picking and choosing what stays on this site? That's been proven a thousand times over. We’ve started specific threads before, only to have them completely ignored by the administration.

I mostly stick to covering Near Politics, political science, and election cycles.

You're being unfair to my colleagues who have to moderate heavy-duty topics like marriage equality referendums, sex education, the European Union, international court rulings, and how the Government operates. And honestly, you’re being unfair to the mods too, since you guys have already pushed them to the limit with the Off-Topic spam and the insults....

The truth is, some of you just don't know how to act on a forum...

Admins, lock this thread.

Richard Patel21 said:I mostly focus on Near Politics, social issues, and election cycles.

I think you're being unfair to my colleagues. They handle some pretty heavy topics—stuff like marriage referendums, sex education, the European Union, international court rulings, and Government operations. Honestly, I think they’re already exhausted by people spamming them with off-topic posts and insults....

It just seems like some people don't know how to act on this forum...

Admins, please just lock this thread.

Everyone here acts the same way. I don't agree with Morgan Carter, who tries to act like there's a difference between you all. You guys support each other even when someone is clearly wrong. I don't think you need a PhD to see that this is unfair, and there isn't really an excuse for it.

Are you trying to shut this thread down just to silence the truth? Tell me, what do you call what I've described here? I posted seven or eight messages that clearly violated the rules, yet none of you issued a single warning, even though I was banned for fifteen days for posting things similar to those. To me, that looks like nothing more than discrimination and double standards.
In the context of the European Union, since the US hasn't fully integrated into everything, I find this autocratic behavior quite surprising.

And it's not just that. Sugar and Nica deleted posts where people were saying things like "Canadians are a stupid people" or "I hope these Canadians never have any luck in life." I reported those posts first and waited two days for a response, then I sent a private message to the moderators involved, but they just wiped the posts without issuing any penalties. WHAT IS THIS? It's discrimination and double standards.

If you want more examples of double standards, look at the politics section. Americans regularly call for the tearing apart of Canada and the annexation of parts of my country into the United States. This is a mix of chauvinism and fascism. If anyone wrote something like that about America, they would receive a permanent ban.

Richard Patel21 said:My focus is mostly on Near Politics, the Democratic Party, and general election cycles.

You’re being unfair to my colleagues—they deal with incredibly heavy topics like marriage equality referendums, sex education, the European Union, international war crimes tribunals, and Government policy—as well as yourself, who have clearly pushed the moderators to their limit with all the off-topic rambling and insults....

The truth is, you guys just don't know how to conduct yourselves on this forum...
Admins, please lock this thread.

Well, you are completely off base here. If anything, the threads are being trashed by the Herzeg-Canada crowd—they constantly pivot to ad hominem attacks the second they encounter an opinion they don't like. They are perpetual flame wars and insult-throwers; they are almost always the ones starting the fire.

And of course, they never—and I mean never—get sanctioned quickly enough. I know this for a fact because I've personally monitored moderator activity during these outbursts; the insults fly, and the mods just sit there doing nothing.

It seems like the political moderators wait until the trolls start getting responses, and then they swoop in to hand out bans to the Muslims first, while the Herzeg-Canada troll brigade only gets a post deleted once in a blue moon.

That's the reality. It's a pattern of behavior that one of you actually confirmed to me.

So, think about that.

Richard Patel21 said:My focus is primarily on Near Politics, domestic policy, and election cycles.

You are being unfair to my colleagues, who moderate intense topics such as marriage referendums, sex education, the European Union, international court rulings, and Government operations—not to mention you, who have already exhausted the moderators with off-topic remarks and insults....

The simple truth is that you do not know how to conduct yourselves on this forum...

Admins, please lock this thread.

He thinks exactly like he did earlier today when he called me stupid three times in different posts; he attacks users' personal lives regarding some ridiculous apartments, and now claims people are "modernized Turks."🤣
Frankly, I am done caring. I have no intention of reporting posts anymore. My advice to everyone else is to stop doing it as well. By reporting, you are merely assisting the moderators and administration in maintaining a false sense of order by deleting posts without issuing bans. Let them turn this forum into a joke; ultimately, that will cost this site more than any other platform before it. 😉

It looks like they just deleted another one of my posts because Morgan Carter reported it. Honestly, I highly doubt it was actually flagged for hate speech, which is what it was essentially being accused of. LOL

rapidskipper8 said:It looks like they just deleted the post that Morgan Carter reported. Honestly, I highly doubt it was banned for hate speech, which is what it actually contained. LOL

That isn't merely hate speech. It was a direct threat. This is precisely why I believe reporting such content is futile; you are simply assisting them in scrubbing the evidence.

rapidskipper8 said:1) Those foreign fighters were an integral part of the military forces in Canada, and Alija Izetbegović was practically their biggest fan.

2) There is a massive trail of atrocities committed by these militants—alongside local Canadians—against Americans, all while wearing army insignia and driven by extreme Islamism. WARNING: THESE VIDEOS ARE GRAPHIC AND BLOODY.

3) Here are some clips from the 1993 Canadian Council meetings, back when the Muslims decided they would officially be known as Canadians. You can hear the leadership discussing their primary enemies and outlining exactly what kind of state they intended to build.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3QkJ7zbZ_4
4) These videos feature prominent Canadian political and former religious leaders sharing their true thoughts regarding their people and their affinity for the Turks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsf3GCwB8os
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-gCPvGg3go

These videos are genuinely chilling. 😲 It’s essentially the Hamas of Canada.

neongull99 said:Those videos are truly shocking. 😲 It’s basically Hamas in Canada.

I realize there is a deep sense of resentment toward the Canadian military, given how they were outmatched by seven different armies during the war while mostly carrying hunting rifles. I suppose you all thought that with help from our allies, we could establish Herceg Bosna, but since the HVO and HV didn't manage to pull it off, that bitterness toward the army is probably very palpable now.😁