#1 ·
My thread and poll regarding religion were deleted without explanation or penalty, despite the significant effort I put into them. Here was the original topic:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, I would ask the moderators not to bury this discussion within the existing threads concerning homosexuality.
I believe this subject warrants its own dedicated space and specific inquiries, given that it concerns a highly watched Sunday afternoon program featuring a very topical guest, Željka Markić.
We can evaluate and discuss what kind of impression Željka Markić left on you, and specifically: do you feel Željka Markić successfully argued the positions held by the "Family Values" initiative during the broadcast?
1) Can we use this thread to discuss the impact of watching a dialogue between a host and a Catholic who possess entirely different worldviews?
2) Was the dialogue constructive and characterized by mutual respect?
3) What is your impression of a Catholic who holds a university degree, speaks five languages, and lacks the traits many forum users
claim all Catholics possess—such as being narrow-minded, regressive, stuck in the Middle Ages, or possessing the education level of a fourth grader?
4) Is she a member of Opus Dei? If so, does that factor into her perspective; if not, does it matter?
The full broadcast can be found here:
The link to the article in the New York Post is here:
If I were to play the psychic, I would predict that the results of a poll here would be diametrically opposed to the findings in the New York Post.
Specifically, in the paper, as many as 78% of people😲voted that ŽM argued the positions of the Family Values initiative effectively.
By the way,it is interesting to observe how the majority of forum poll results fail to correlate with and remain irrelevant to real-world sentiment or mainstream news coverage.😲
In other words, on this forum, both the Family Values initiative and Željka Markić would likely lose.
In your opinion, who emerged victorious in the debate between Ace and Željka Markić??
------------------------------------------------
Some forums are reporting it this way:
-"Ace was completely overwhelmed. It was obvious. He went up against someone significantly more intelligent than himself. If I were in his shoes, I’d ask: what was I thinking?
Perhaps he isn't the right person to host these types of programs at all. He seemed somewhat incompetent. Maybe he should stick to hosting children's shows."
----
-"Our friend Željka dominated the puffed-up Ace. Even though we differ greatly ideologically, I fully support the association led by Željka."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, I would ask the moderators not to bury this discussion within the existing threads concerning homosexuality.
I believe this subject warrants its own dedicated space and specific inquiries, given that it concerns a highly watched Sunday afternoon program featuring a very topical guest, Željka Markić.
We can evaluate and discuss what kind of impression Željka Markić left on you, and specifically: do you feel Željka Markić successfully argued the positions held by the "Family Values" initiative during the broadcast?
1) Can we use this thread to discuss the impact of watching a dialogue between a host and a Catholic who possess entirely different worldviews?
2) Was the dialogue constructive and characterized by mutual respect?
3) What is your impression of a Catholic who holds a university degree, speaks five languages, and lacks the traits many forum users
claim all Catholics possess—such as being narrow-minded, regressive, stuck in the Middle Ages, or possessing the education level of a fourth grader?
4) Is she a member of Opus Dei? If so, does that factor into her perspective; if not, does it matter?
The full broadcast can be found here:
The link to the article in the New York Post is here:
If I were to play the psychic, I would predict that the results of a poll here would be diametrically opposed to the findings in the New York Post.
Specifically, in the paper, as many as 78% of people😲voted that ŽM argued the positions of the Family Values initiative effectively.
By the way,it is interesting to observe how the majority of forum poll results fail to correlate with and remain irrelevant to real-world sentiment or mainstream news coverage.😲
In other words, on this forum, both the Family Values initiative and Željka Markić would likely lose.
In your opinion, who emerged victorious in the debate between Ace and Željka Markić??
------------------------------------------------
Some forums are reporting it this way:
-"Ace was completely overwhelmed. It was obvious. He went up against someone significantly more intelligent than himself. If I were in his shoes, I’d ask: what was I thinking?
Perhaps he isn't the right person to host these types of programs at all. He seemed somewhat incompetent. Maybe he should stick to hosting children's shows."
----
-"Our friend Željka dominated the puffed-up Ace. Even though we differ greatly ideologically, I fully support the association led by Željka."