#21 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:I agree—though that’s entirely dependent on your own personal take. For me, even Pierce Brosnan isn't quite the definitive Bond; I still lean toward Sean Connery, though when I see him on screen now, I don't immediately associate him with the character anymore.
Well, that's likely because Connery built such an incredibly diverse filmography—we're talking massive, career-defining roles—leaving behind a much more substantial legacy outside of his time as Bond.🙂
That being said, having a wide range shouldn't necessarily disqualify someone from being seen as the quintessential embodiment of a role they once mastered.🙂