Started by Susan Price30 · · 👁 5 views · 28 replies
Kevin Williams56 said:Visited, deleted, locked!
Susan Price30 said:Yeah, thanks! Now I’m just waiting on the admin to actually deal with those reported posts where this clone was being straight-up abusive.
Susan Price30 said:maybe, who knows. either you think it's your job to nitpick and wipe my posts while letting other off-topic crap or trolls slide... or you just don't care about giving a massive insult and a personal attack on Blue Dada.
yeah, you handled everything perfectly... just flawless...
Susan Price30 said:Also, if possible, could an admin please take a look at the deleted posts from user in that thread mentioned above? There was some seriously nasty, non-stop bullying going on there.
Thanks a bunch, cheers!
Look, ma'am, the admins can see all three of your posts from that thread I deleted. They’re free to weigh in, and they could even restore them if they think they actually belong here.
Susan Price30 said:Look, my point was just about that selective deleting we saw happening in that other thread. That's all there is to it...
Kevin Williams56 said:When you ask "which one," what exactly do you mean? I can't work with just "smo." If you want me to rewrite something, give me the actual text. I don't do guesswork. "Witnesses"? What do you mean by "you all"? Who exactly witnessed anything? All I see here is your complaint—and frankly, it’s pretty vague. You haven't provided a single concrete detail to back it up.
Look, I need you to give me some actual, concrete examples of this "selective" censorship you're talking about. Let's get specific so we're all on the same page.
hiddenmoose16 said:Look, personally I’m with Susan Price30 on this one. The way you and a few others handle the political moderation is obvious to anyone with eyes...
And don't come at me with that "show me proof" crap. I stated my opinion. You don't have to agree with it, and I'm not asking you to.
I've been hanging around the Forum, posting here and there, reading more than I write, and honestly? It feels like this whole place is circling the drain...
Kevin Williams56 said:Look, hiddenmoose16, if we’re talking about "artistic" vibes or just my own gut feeling, you’re obviously entitled to yours. Saying "I don't like how the site is being moderated" is a perfectly fine stance to take. Whether it's me or someone else on the Forum disagrees with you, everyone has the right to voice their opinion.
If we’re going to start throwing around accusations about "selective censorship," then I’m going to insist on seeing hard evidence. We can't just let these claims sit there based on hearsay and expect everyone to take them at face value. If you're going to make an accusation, back it up with facts.
The main reason I’m even replying is because of that "artistic" way you address a lady on this Forum, especially that whole bit about "insulting someone's reading"...
And honestly? I'm not fascinated by some "artistic" performance, nor am I interested in how that crap affects this site (PDF Politics)...
hiddenmoose16 said:but since we're here...
You’ve got a specific complaint right here in this post, which you seemingly ignored just to turn this into some petty back-and-forth. And let me be crystal clear—I have zero interest in bickering with anyone, especially you...
I said what I said. 😁
Live and let live...
When you say "we witnessed this," are you implying there were multiple people involved? Who exactly was witnessing it? All I see here is your complaint, which feels quite vague and lacks any real substance.
So, I would appreciate it if you could provide specific examples of this "selective" deletion so we can actually discuss facts rather than assumptions.
What actually prompted me to reach out was that "artistic" way you address the women on this Forum, especially that part about "forbidding reading"
And honestly, I’m not particularly fascinated by such an "artistic" approach, nor am I impressed by the platform it impacts (Politics.com)...
It has become a playground for subjects to vent their devotion to the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, while simultaneously demanding the deletion and punishment of any critique, all while provoking those users who refuse to treat the old lady like a deity or worship her.
It seems everything that needed to be said about the old queen has been said.
So, until next time.
Well, even that response needs a bit more context to make sense. 🙂
Susan Price30 said:__________________
specifically the last two pages, for instance...
And another thing—I really don't like your tone, so I don't want to keep this going (this is the second time you've acted combative and patronizing whenever someone criticizes how you moderate this specific sub-forum; it seems like your default setting).
Personally, I was just looking for opinions and input from others (like the admins) regarding the questions I brought up here...
And what would that even be? And you think whatever "context" you see justifies your rude response or something? I don't get it.
Well, here we go, yet another baseless and sweeping accusation. Look, Susan Price30, you aren't right. You received a perfectly reasonable response before you started making claims about people "targeting" your posts. Both you and I—and heaven knows the admins too—know there was no targeting involved; everything removed was simply content that deserved to be removed.
Mr. Matovina also received a decent response. Everyone gets treated according to their own merits: polite users are treated politely, while those being malicious get what they deserve. So, you can take these latest fabrications about me having "standard procedures" and just throw them in the trash.