Thomas Hayes5
Member
12 messages
joined Dec 2013
I’m quite a critic when it comes to Woody—to put it bluntly, I find him personally grating and just plain unpleasant, which leads me to avoid his films whenever possible. For instance, I actually found myself fast-forwarding through > because his mere presence tends to derail the entire viewing experience for me—whether it’s him lounging in his boxers or just his specific way of speaking... and yes, I realize that is precisely what makes him "unique," but for me, it’s a total dealbreaker. It isn't that I haven't seen his work, but any of his films where he isn't front and center are automatically better in my eyes. Perhaps it’s a bit superficial of me, but I simply can't help it.
As for >, I watched it purely because there wasn't anything else playing at the theater that caught my eye, and I was already in the mood for a movie night. The film itself is decent enough—it has a few funny moments, and most importantly, Woody doesn't pop up too often.