CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › What rule did I break and how?

What rule did I break and how?

Started by bluecyclist64 · · 👁 4 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants bluecyclist64hollowtrucker77Arthur Kim74Aaron Harris2Carl Sanchez40Tyler Bishop56
bluecyclist64 bluecyclist64 RegularOP
369 messages
joined Oct 2011
#1 ·
I mean, I get it—this topic clearly wasn't the right fit for MK—but why wasn't it just moved to a more appropriate sub-forum instead of being wiped out entirely?
I actually put quite a bit of heart into several posts over there, and now they've just vanished without a trace...😢
If you decide to scrap an entire thread just because a few trolls decided to act up, aren't you essentially rewarding their behavior?
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#2 ·
I honestly couldn't think of a more fitting place for this discussion than the trash bin
if the garbage actually had some useful scraps left in it, maybe then we could find a spot for this nonsense
kudos to everyone here who actually posted something coherent or remotely intelligent, but let’s be real—the very concept behind this thread is just plain deranged
Arthur Kim74 Arthur Kim74 Active Member
91 messages
joined Jun 2010
#3 ·
Well, there's been a similar thread floating around for quite a while now, one where everyone was debating whether we actually need to dump this topic into the trash bin...🤷

It honestly feels like just another case of that classic MK syndrome...🙄
Aaron Harris2 Aaron Harris2 Member
41 messages
joined Jan 2008
#4 ·
Elizabeth Baker38 said:It appears that we are witnessing what can only be described as a pervasive MK syndrome.🙄

What exactly are we discussing here?
Can you not see that the administrator relegated this to the Trash folder rather than the MK moderators handling it?

I must confess that I simply could not devote the necessary amount of time to addressing that particular issue as thoroughly as the situation warranted. It truly required at least an hour of intensive moderation just to scrub away the trolls and those rather offensive, insulting posts that were cluttering the thread, especially considering how many genuinely high-quality contributions were being written amidst all that noise.
It truly pains me to see things have unfolded in such a manner, especially considering that had I possessed the immediate capacity to clear everything away right then and there, she would still be alive today. I cannot help but think that many others in this situation would have ended up facing nothing more than a stack of cardboard boxes as their only consequence. 😁

Let me be perfectly clear: the relocation of this discussion was by no means unmerited. I find the subject matter itself to be profoundly compelling, as it touches upon a very real sociological shift within our country. There truly are individuals who have no desire to become parents, some who find the very concept of childrearing to be quite off-putting, and others who simply choose to prioritize their professional ambitions and career trajectories far above the pursuit of starting a family.
Carl Sanchez40 Carl Sanchez40 Member
15 messages
joined May 2012
#5 ·
And honestly, it often ends with people like that dying all alone, while they spend their final moments convinced the entire world is out to get them... 🙂
Arthur Kim74 Arthur Kim74 Active Member
91 messages
joined Jun 2010
#6 ·
Aaron Harris2 said:Which one?
Don't you see the admin moved it to the Trash instead of the MK mods doing it?

I wasn't even bringing up how the moderators handle things, I just meant it hasn't been that long since we've seen threads with great discussions get tossed into the bin rather than just being cleaned up and kept on MK...
Who's moving them there or what the reasoning is, I'm not really getting into that side of it...
Isn't it better for everyone if we try to make MK more engaging, instead of just cycling through the same old topics over and over again...🤷
Aaron Harris2 said:Personally, I didn't have enough time during those few hours to give that thread the attention it deserved (it really needed about an hour of cleaning up all the trolls and insults), especially with so many high-quality posts being written...
I feel bad it turned out this way, because if I had been able to clean everything up immediately, the thread would still be active right now. And plenty of people would have ended up banned too... 😁

The way I see it, it wasn't unfairly moved to where it is. The topic itself is actually super interesting to me, because there are definitely people who don't want kids, some find the idea repulsive, and others just prioritize their careers over starting a family...

Nobody expects the moderators to be online twenty-four seven, but if there are ten solid posts, that thread is worth saving...
Is there anything that can be done about that...😁
Aaron Harris2 Aaron Harris2 Member
41 messages
joined Jan 2008
#7 ·
Elizabeth Baker38 said:It stands to reason that it would be in the best interest of MSNBC to strive toward becoming a more compelling and engaging network, rather than simply recycling a predictable rotation of topics through the same tired rhetorical formulas.🤷

That is precisely the objective, without question. 🙂
I believe you are referring to that very first thing you wrote, rather than this subsequent point. 😁

Elizabeth Baker38 said:It is certainly not anyone's expectation that moderators should be perpetually tethered to their screens, nor is it reasonable to demand their constant presence; however, if a discussion manages to garner ten truly substantive and high-quality posts, then one must conclude that the topic possesses sufficient merit to warrant preservation.
Is there any meaningful action that can be taken regarding that specific inquiry?😁

The matter has been brought to the floor, the discussion has reached its conclusion, and quite frankly, there is nothing left to be said on the subject.
Should a discussion of this nature ever be initiated again, I would personally endeavor to ensure its continuity and quality, just as my colleagues would certainly do. Sometimes such an undertaking succeeds brilliantly, while at other times it falters; after all, navigating these complex topics is often quite a treacherous and unpredictable road.
Greetings to everyone.
Arthur Kim74 Arthur Kim74 Active Member
91 messages
joined Jun 2010
#8 ·
Thanks so much for getting back to me😁
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#9 ·
It’s exactly what Deedy was getting at, really
I mean, sure, someone can start a thread and try to get a conversation going
but looking back at how this whole thing even got kicked off, it just feels cheap, honestly—it’s less about actual discussion and more like someone just standing on a soapbox trying to preach to the choir
bluecyclist64 bluecyclist64 RegularOP
369 messages
joined Oct 2011
#10 ·
Well, damn.
It looks like I’ll have to hold off until the fall, otherwise I run the risk of having my threads tossed straight into the trash bin.
Tyler Bishop56 Tyler Bishop56 Member
43 messages
joined Dec 2007
#11 ·
Look, just like how some women decide they don't want kids, I guess some admins just don't want certain topics around. It feels unnatural, honestly, and it makes my heart ache toward God, but hey, it's their right.
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#12 ·
don't bring up any kids, and don't even think about touching any other topics either

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads