Charles Fox10 said:Look, gentlemen—this moderator has been dealing with people throwing insults at our leaders here on this Forum for nearly a decade now. It’s always the same thing, isn't it? People coming up with all sorts of ridiculous nicknames and labels for our President—everything from weird little jabs to just plain nonsense—and frankly, in the interest of democracy and, I don't know, just basic human decency, I’m asking you all to please stop inventing these "creative" monikers for the President. If we actually respect the office of the Presidency, then we respect the Constitution of the United States, and I’d like to believe we all care enough about our country to show that respect.
Thanks.
🤦
So, according to this logic, a Secretary is just some nobody that nobody even voted for, so it's perfectly fine to write stuff like:
he says: I won't work with that damn Davor Šuker and other bottom-feeders like him! — implying that the political climate in the country will shift until it becomes impossible for an idiot like him to serve as Secretary of the Treasury.In the American Government, a Secretary is allowed to call a total idiot like Davor Šuker a bottom-feeder.
And you have the nerve to talk to me about respecting the institutions of the United States!?
Honestly, I'm speechless.
🙏
