CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Daybreakers (2009)

Daybreakers (2009)

Started by Walter Cooper10 · · 👁 5 views · 37 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Walter Cooper10Chloe Palmer2copperseal30Grace DoyleJose Thomas6Raymond Palmer8boldtiger7coppergardener13Chloe Nguyensilverotter2Brenda Sanders46briskhound2Jeremy RobertsDrew Sanders5rustyscout34swiftcrane96George Davis6feralorca82quietdriver3Nicole Foster71bluebison8Carol Bishop5brighthawk64Nicole Thomas …
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#21 ·
rustyscout34 said:but there aren't any werewolves in Daybreakers... 🤔

Nah...
rustyscout34 rustyscout34 Active Member
110 messages
joined Aug 2009
#22 ·
briskhound2 said:Nope...

I know, which is why the comparison isn't really fair... 🙂
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#23 ·
rustyscout34 said:I get it, which is why the comparison doesn't really hold water... 🙂

I was just building on what you were saying...🙂 Those two movies don't actually have anything to do with each other.
swiftcrane96 swiftcrane96 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2012
#24 ·
Personally, I’m not even a huge fan of Underworld; I guess the only one I can actually sit through every single time is Blade.
Drew Sanders5 Drew Sanders5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jul 2010
#25 ·
Look, I know there isn't one, but honestly? It’ll probably still turn out better than Daybreakers did. I mean, come on—I didn't see any actual connection to vampires in that flick other than some guys having pointy teeth... it just lacked that certain *something*, you know?
George Davis6 George Davis6 Active Member
53 messages
joined Jun 2007
#26 ·
Caught the midnight premiere at AMC Theatres last night.

What an absolute disaster of a movie. Honestly, it’s been a long time since I’ve sat through something this bad—the acting was wooden and totally uninspired, the plot felt disjointed and rushed, the score was painful, and there was just so much forced melodrama everywhere... a total train wreck. It’s such a shame because the concept actually had potential! The idea is solid, but the execution? Just awful. Between three scenes that actually made me jump in my seat and Ethan Hawke (who, let's be real, looks like he's constantly in physical discomfort throughout the whole thing—though, okay, he's still easy on the eyes), I’m giving this a 2/10.
feralorca82 feralorca82 Active Member
154 messages
joined Mar 2011
#27 ·
Olivia Alvarez said:Caught the midnight premiere at AMC Theatres yesterday.

What a disaster. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen something this bad—wooden acting, zero chemistry, a messy plot, terrible score, and just pure melodrama everywhere. A total mess. It's a shame because the concept actually had legs, but the execution was just lazy. Between three jump scares that actually got me and the fact that Ethan Hawke (I mean, he looks like he's perpetually constipated, though he's still easy on the eyes) carried most of the weight, I'm giving it a 2/10.

😂🤣
Luckily, I wasn't planning on seeing it anyway.
That was basically my face while watching Days of Night.
At least Perfect Creature wasn't half bad.
quietdriver3 quietdriver3 Regular
290 messages
joined Mar 2005
#28 ·
Olivia Alvarez said:What an absolute disaster of a movie. Honestly, it’s been ages since I’ve sat through something this bad—just uninspired, disinterested acting, a plot that feels totally disjointed and rushed, terrible music, and just way too much melodrama everywhere... A complete train wreck.

Wow, I actually had the complete opposite experience. 😁

I mean, I thought the acting was solid, the plot was pretty straightforward and direct, and the soundtrack was actually kind of cool—it sort of makes up for the lack of epic scale you'd expect from a bigger budget. No heavy-handed melodrama, just decent directing.

I really liked the world they built, the way everything came together, and the story itself was decent. Plus, there are a few scenes toward the end that horror fans might actually enjoy.

If I had to describe it, maybe it’s like a mashup of The Matrix and I Am Legend. It feels like a bit of a budget version of those, but I guess that works out okay, since they didn't try to overdo it with stuff they couldn't afford.
Nicole Foster71 Nicole Foster71 Member
25 messages
joined Mar 2012
#29 ·
Personally, I thought the film was fantastic and quite original—my only gripe was that I was kind of hoping for a more "bombastic" finale👍
bluebison8 bluebison8 Active Member
131 messages
joined Apr 2008
#30 ·
My wife and I caught this today, and we both walked out of the AMC Theatres feeling pretty satisfied. If you're a fan of San Francisco sci-fi, it's definitely worth a look.

The acting was decent, the score didn't bother me, and the world-building was actually quite cool. Sure, there are plenty of plot holes and inconsistencies in the lore, but hey—that’s just part of the sci-fi genre.

My only gripe is the ending. It felt rushed; the narrative basically took a backseat just so they could pivot into some totally unrealistic action sequences.
Carol Bishop5 Carol Bishop5 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jan 2008
#31 ·
The movie felt way too unpolished, and honestly, the runtime is a massive letdown. 👎
The plot resolution was almost moronic, and that final scene? Totally wasted...
I gotta admit, I was expecting a completely different ending. I kept thinking instead of that whole substitute blood thing, they’d start harvesting blood from those "cured" corpses just to somehow reset the population back to humanity, but nope, nothing. (Now I'm actually sitting here spiraling, trying to figure out how they could have pulled that off) Dafoe's whole "come get your cure" bit was just like, wtf... as if some epic saga just wrapped up or something..🤣
brighthawk64 brighthawk64 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2010
#32 ·
Jeremy Roberts said:The movie isn't actually bad. Sure, the pacing drags a little, but compared to the endless sea of vampire flicks out there, the concept itself is pretty unique.
In about 99.9% of vampire movies, you see the same old tropes—it's usually just one rogue vampire or some small, secretive cult. This takes a completely different approach.👍

Fair point, I actually liked that aspect of it too. Overall, the film wasn't nearly as bad as I had initially feared.
Nicole Thomas Nicole Thomas Newcomer
1 message
joined Jan 2009
#33 ·
Joshua James57 said:I have to admit—I was expecting something a bit different at the end there. I really thought they might go the route of using blood from those "cured" corpses instead of just some synthetic substitute—sort of a way to reset the population back toward humanity—but nope, nothing. (Now I’m actually sitting here overthinking how they would have even pulled that off) It's just Dafoe standing there like, "Come get your medicine," and I'm just like... what? It feels like a massive saga just wrapped up, but without the payoff..🤣

I'm with you—they probably left the ending hanging to make the scale of the whole scheme feel more epic, aiming for that artistic impact—but honestly, that's just lost on this particular movie.
There are bright spots, though. I actually liked the concept of a vampire civilization and the logistics of how that would function on a day-to-day basis—especially the way the "normal" vampires look down their noses at the transformed ones, acting like, "We are a hundred times better than these animals." You could definitely draw a parallel there to what happens to our own society once we run out of the resources we depend on—how civilized will we actually remain?
But that's really it. They had one great idea and then basically decided to kill it off with messy plotting, lukewarm characters, and dialogue that just doesn't land. And I have to hand it to them, they actually succeeded in making it feel that way ☕

Rating 4/10
Keith Howard6 Keith Howard6 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2008
#34 ·
Henry Richardson62 said:I’m with you. They probably left those endings open just to make the failure feel "grand" or some artistic nonsense—but that totally missed the mark here.
There are bright spots, though. I actually liked the concept of a vampire civilization and how that would function on a day-to-day basis, especially the way the "normal" vampires look down on the mutated ones. It’s like they’re saying, "We’re a hundred times better than these animals." You could easily draw a parallel to what happens to our own society once we run out of the resources we depend on and see how "civilized" we really are.
But that’s it. They had one solid idea and then decided to murder it with weak plots, bland characters, and cringey dialogue. And I have to admit, they pulled it off perfectly. ☕

Rating 4/10

Totally agree. The premise is pretty original and could have been developed much more intelligently. Unfortunately, about 20 minutes in, it falls right into the trap of a standard B-horror. A genuinely interesting, provocative film was right there for the taking, and they completely blew it.
copperhawk19 copperhawk19 Member
13 messages
joined Dec 2009
#35 ·
Total garbage of a movie... just finished watching it...
Willem Dafoe is the only reason I'm even giving this credit; he's a legend, and that's about it.
2/10
Joseph Booth Joseph Booth Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2010
#36 ·
I’m not even giving this a 2/10, honestly... I’ll settle on a 1/10 because it’s absolute garbage and I can't bring myself to go any higher. Whoever was responsible for making this movie and the entire production behind it deserves to be hauled off to a scrap yard and burned,
Peter Vaughn3 Peter Vaughn3 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2008
#37 ·
While I think the core concept is truly well-conceived, I can't help but feel that if the narrative had been fleshed out with just a few more intricate details, it might have actually blossomed into a stellar film😂
Paul Anderson7 Paul Anderson7 Active Member
97 messages
joined Jun 2010
#38 ·
It was a brilliant concept, but they sort of lost the thread somewhere along the way. This could have been a truly great movie, but instead, it just lands as being good. At least in my book. It was worth the watch, but nothing to write home about.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads