CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online
log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Can Eminem explain where he sees gender discrimination in my post?

Can Eminem explain where he sees gender discrimination in my post?

Started by swiftorca57 · · 👁 4 views · 14 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants swiftorca57feralpilot0Matthew Anderson4rowdyhawk10Steven Clark2Henry Cox78Melissa Watson4Roger Barrett2
swiftorca57 swiftorca57 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#1 ·
Active Infraction ( points: 50)
sexism
Expires
01:42 07/23/2009
Left by
Eminem
01:42 06/23/2009

Quote: smieskica said:Unlike that one Silvio Berlusconi guy who, you know, keeps his media statements super "measured"

Look, I don't think this is about some sexual misconduct from a politician. Who they're sleeping with or whatever? Honestly, I couldn't care less about any of that..!!!

But calling a woman a piece of furniture? That's not just brutal, it's totally indefensible..!! It’s one thing to say it, but another to actually act on it..!!!!

[]Anyway, just my two cents on women being seen as "lesser." In my book, they're actually way more valuable than men..!!!
__________________
feralpilot0 feralpilot0 Active Member
142 messages
joined Jul 2018
#2 ·
I don't see much more gender discrimination than what you're describing—it's just wrapped in fancy packaging, isn't it? Yours only seemed to bother you because it didn't play nice with the ladies.
swiftorca57 swiftorca57 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#3 ·
feralpilot0 said:I don't see any major gender discrimination here. Honestly, maybe you just didn't want to hear the truth?

Look, he's clearly biased against feralpilot0. When someone gets blinded by hypocrisy and hate, they only see what they want to see... right?

Still waiting on a response from our fair-minded and 😂unbiased🤣 gentleman, Eminem..!!
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#4 ·
You owe me another 50 bucks just for being illiterate ☕
swiftorca57 swiftorca57 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#5 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:Maybe add another 50 for being clueless ☕

Oh, you sure did.!
Thought I needed to add more..!!🙂

Well, you nailed it..!! Totally impressed by your "intelligence"..!!🤣☕

Still waiting on Eminem to get cleared.
rowdyhawk10 rowdyhawk10 Active Member
123 messages
joined Oct 2009
#6 ·
I suppose there’s some truth to what people say about Uranija. It’s hard to pin down exactly where they stand, but I guess you could say their influence is felt more than it is seen. Maybe that’s just how it works with organizations like that. kaže:
I don't see much evidence of significant gender discrimination being wrapped up in fancy packaging here.

Which one? We could always just redo the paperwork. 😍

swiftorca57 said:Here is my take on women, who, in my estimation, are nothing less than—and perhaps even more—valuable than men.

Claiming that women are more valuable than men is just plain sexism, I guess.
It is essentially the same logic one might use to claim that men are inherently more valuable than women.

I didn't give you 500, just 50 points, since this is the first time around.
On the bright side, some girl actually reported you. 🙂
Steven Clark2 Steven Clark2 Active Member
85 messages
joined Sep 2020
#7 ·
rowdyhawk10 said:Claiming that women are more valuable than men is sexism,
just as much as saying men are more valuable than women.

Ultimately, what constitutes sexism is often a matter of personal perspective. Such a statement isn't inherently sexist—at least, there is no universal consensus on the matter. It seems you have projected your own views, or perhaps reacted too hastily based on an interpretation that Vava never actually intended. In my humble opinion, it might have been more productive to ask him to clarify his reasoning rather than immediately issuing a penalty. It appears you may have misjudged the situation, and I suspect it is proving difficult for you to admit that error.
Henry Cox78 Henry Cox78 Regular
286 messages
joined Apr 2011
#8 ·
rowdyhawk10 said:Claiming women are more valuable than men is pure sexism,
just like saying men are worth more than women.

That's not sexism, it's just a straight-up fact. Women are way more valuable than men, period. Every guy knows it.
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#9 ·
swiftorca57 said:Pretty sure you thought that'd work.!
Just needed to get it posted..!!🙂

Well, mission accomplished..!! Impressed by how much of an idiot you are..!!🤣☕

Still waiting on rowdyhawk10 to be tagged.!!!

And another 50 for being clueless ☕
Ever heard of a dialect?
swiftorca57 swiftorca57 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#10 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:Now you gotta pay 50 bucks just for being clueless.☕
Ever heard of a dialect?

Man, you're getting exhausting with all this nonsense...!!!
Did you even use that dialect back in grade school? If you actually went, that is...!!
I took a look at your old posts and now you're lecturing me on grammar? Wow...!!!

P.S. Quit bugging everyone with this crap...!!!:
rowdyhawk10 rowdyhawk10 Active Member
123 messages
joined Oct 2009
#11 ·
swiftorca57,
I believe I provided you with a fair response, so there really isn't any need for this thread to escalate further. Regards.
swiftorca57 swiftorca57 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#12 ·
Thanks for the breakdown, rowdyhawk10
Look, I’m just sharing my take as a regular user here..!! My opinion might be right or it might be wrong, but shouldn't I have the right to jump into the conversation? I'm just giving my personal view on what this woman is worth..!!!
Since you already explained this to everyone else, I'll pback you up on that point..!!! Just like you, I'm not posting an "official statement," just my own perspective as a guy on this forum..!!


rowdyhawk10 said:As a moderator, I'm not some machine or a bot. I think I have every right to join the chat when I feel like I've got something to contribute. As a mod, I'm not laying down some "official truth" for the whole site, just offering my human perspective and my own thoughts as a user. It's an opinion that could be totally wrong or totally right. 🤷

So what's the deal now?? You get to voice your own opinion, but you shut me down and hit me with a red card for doing the same thing...
And you still claim to be fair and tolerant..!!
Melissa Watson4 Melissa Watson4 Member
24 messages
joined Dec 2008
#13 ·
rowdyhawk10 said:swiftorca57,
I gave you a fair response. I don't think there's any need to let this thread spiral. Post.

Are you actually claiming he just handed out a meaningless penalty for no reason?🙂
Roger Barrett2 Roger Barrett2 Member
33 messages
joined May 2010
#14 ·
swiftorca57;21314033 said:Thanks for clearing that up, rowdyhawk10.
But look, I’m speaking as a forum member here. My opinion might be right or it might be wrong, but I believe I have every right to join the discussion as a participant. I'm just sharing my personal take on what makes a woman valuable.
Just like you explained to everyone else here, I support your position on this. As someone participating in this thread, I'm not trying to state an official policy; I'm just giving my own individual perspective as a user.

So, what’s the deal with all this? You claim the right to your own personal opinion, yet you challenge mine and then hit me with a red card...
And you still have the nerve to say you're being fair and tolerant.

Trying to stay neutral in this debate, I have to back swiftorca57. To me, handing out a penalty just because someone shares a personal opinion—provided there's no actual malice behind it—seems pretty foolish. Personally, I think women tend to be wiser than men in quite a few areas... oops... I'll probably get a red card for that one!
swiftorca57 swiftorca57 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#15 ·

Thanks for clearing that up, rowdyhawk10!
Look, I’m just sharing my two cents as a guy on this forum. My take might be right, might be wrong—who knows? But I figured I had every right to jump into the discussion and weigh in on how I see this woman's value. Is that such a crime?
Just like you explained to everyone on here, I'm totally on board with your take. Just a heads-up though—I'm not speaking for anyone else or making an official statement. This is just my own personal opinion as a fellow user.


Quote:
rowdyhawk10 said:Look, I'm a mod, but I'm not some damn robot. Don't I get to jump into a thread when I actually have something to say? Being a moderator doesn't mean I'm dropping some "official truth" that everyone has to follow. It's just my own take. Just a regular person sharing an opinion. Might be right, might be wrong. Who knows? [/B]

So what am I supposed to say to all this? You get to have your own opinion, but the second I share mine, you try to shut me down and throw a red card my way? Seriously?
And you still claim you're all about fairness and tolerance? Seriously?

Still waiting on an explanation from the esteemed Mr. rowdyhawk10. Why's it that he and I don't have the same rights when it comes to sharing our takes on this forum?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads