CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Trail of Tears - Way of the Cross - looking for an explanation

Trail of Tears - Way of the Cross - looking for an explanation

Started by Nathan Bailey65 · · 👁 3 views · 14 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nathan Bailey65Kevin MitchellRonald Allenmistycyclist5John Palmer4Sarah Wilson95granitepilot282mellowraven22
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active MemberOP
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#1 ·
I’m looking for an explanation and the name of whoever deleted this thread.

Memorial Day and the Trail of Tears regarding a PDF from Politics

And they did it in record time—it wasn't even visible for a few minutes.

The original post read:

This year, the anniversary coincided with the local elections. Even though nobody is really talking about it lately, it's time we remember the victims who were executed without trial during the Trail of Tears, which followed when the Britons handed over soldiers and civilians to the bloodthirsty hands of the partisans and Stalin at Wounded Knee.

In remembrance...

Let us not forget...

THEY
Bow your heads and walk in silence.
Bent low, quietly, down this dark street.
Quietly, on tiptoe, follow me.
I will lead you through the desolate plains.
Lead you along paths, endless roads
Lead you through forests, through thickets dense.
Lead you to one lonely place.

There lies a graveyard, simple and modest,
Crosses once stood there; they are gone now,
Only the mounds remain, neatly arranged,
Cracked and weathered by wind and rain.

No candles are ever lit here.
Nor do bells toll for them here,
Nature herself lays out the flowers,
She alone adorns their mournful graves.

Do not tread upon the fresh grass,
It sprouted from their very blood.
Watch in silence and bow your head,
Pay your respects with quiet reverence.

The furrows are still there, grey in the meadow,
Here, steel once plowed the earth,
Here, they stood brave amidst the fire,
Who today sleep beneath the mound.

They are dead—but come closer;
See that faint, pale, delicate glimmer;
That miraculous light rising from the grave;
Those are their immortal ideals.

You have seen them—those somber mounds;
A band of heroes
Who knew how to die.
Go now, but go in silence!
Know that they fell for you too...........
Abraham Lincoln Jr.


It wasn't trolling, it wasn't offensive, there was no hate speech, and it certainly wasn't just a copy-paste job because there was a personal commentary—an intro before the video clip and the poem.

For those who don't know, on May 15, 1945, the Trail of Tears began at the Wounded Knee Battlefield.

So, who deleted the thread? Which moderator or administrator was it?
Kevin Mitchell Kevin Mitchell Member
14 messages
joined Aug 2011
#2 ·
I assume it's because you designed the topic in a way that doesn't allow for any real debate. The only possible responses are going to be "rest in peace" or those endless arguments about Ustaše vs. Partisans.🤷
Ronald Allen Ronald Allen Active Member
160 messages
joined Oct 2010
#3 ·
I honestly have no clue who shut this thread down, but I really hope—just for once—that you guys learn how the Politics section on PDF is just absolutely drowning in endless debates about Ustaše, partisans, Chetniks, and every other group trying to tear down the USA. This specific topic is just getting to be a bit much, I guess.
mistycyclist5 mistycyclist5 Active Member
63 messages
joined Jul 2010
#4 ·
On one hand, you’ve got Amanda Booth42 and her crowd constantly whining that we're dragging everyone back to some bygone era of communism, yet on the other hand, they can't seem to stop obsessing over World War II.

To hell with the war and all of it. There are plenty of topics like this floating around, so honestly, just open whatever you want to talk about on the Politics Forum. ☕
John Palmer4 John Palmer4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2008
#5 ·
mistycyclist5 said:Screw war and everything else. You guys have plenty of enough topics like this already.

Well, at least mistycyclist5 and I can finally agree on something! 😬

(though I'm sure the other two were getting wise before she even spoke)
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active MemberOP
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#6 ·
It’s perfectly clear to me that there are certain users and moderators here who find this topic unsettling. It seems they are following the old playbook of the previous regime, attempting to silence anyone who dares to bring up these specific issues through every possible means at their disposal.

I’m certainly not disputing their right to hold those opinions or to express them.

What I am protesting, however, are these undemocratic, almost totalitarian tactics—deleting anything that contradicts their narrative or threatens the polished image they try to project. They want to present themselves as free-thinking, democratic, and open to all perspectives, especially when it comes to showing empathy for innocent victims.

But this behavior proves they are actually the exact opposite of everything they claim to be, especially since this thread hasn't violated a single rule of the Forum.

In an era where mass graves are being unearthed and the supposed "glory" of the so-called "anti-fascists" is finally being exposed for what it really was, isn't saying "we don't want to live in the past" just a hollow cliché?

I have no desire to dwell on it either, but we have a responsibility to speak the truth if we ever want the future to be truly free.
I don't see any reason why we can't discuss this—the post simply references the date that marked the beginning of that bloody feast, better known as the Way of the Cross.

So, once again, I am asking: which moderator is actively trying to suppress the memory of Wounded Knee?
Ronald Allen Ronald Allen Active Member
160 messages
joined Oct 2010
#7 ·
Amanda Booth42 said:...

Have you even stopped to ask yourself lately what the Politics section would look like if we started a brand new thread for every single anniversary or every time some new grave was found? I guess you just don't get the difference between "reviving old, dead threads that are out of date for that exact reason" and "adding new info to an existing thread if it actually serves a purpose". In the first case, you're gonna get a strike for breaking subforum rules, but in the second, you might actually build a decent discussion that could lead to, I don't know, a constructive conversation.

For you people on Politics, every tiny little hiccup from one of our politicians is a reason to start a new thread. Every single statement is just an excuse to mock someone or bicker on the forum, and don't even get me started on the clones, the pointless threads, and the trolls. That little bird flu outbreak you guys made such a big deal about? That's nothing compared to the absolute mess going on among you. The intolerance, the hate, the total lack of social skills, and those low-life urges to satisfy yourselves through hate speech, disgusting insults, and constant trolling—with topics that wouldn't even be fit for the Garbage section (if that even existed)—you really think that stuff is tolerated here...?

Just because the section is called On the Edge of Politics doesn't mean everyone is obligated to open at least three threads a day just to hit their daily quota of crap while staring at a picture of Bush in the newspaper. And no, it doesn't mean every stupid thread stays up just because you guys are used to posting nonsense from sunrise to late at night.

Your thread has been chewed up and spat out so many times that even the gum in a grandma's mouth from the 1920s would feel fresher. So, I really don't see why you're even demanding to know (as if you have a say!) who closed it, let alone why a moderator should bother answering you. What would even a name mean to you...? Some fictional character from someone's wild imagination that you'll spend the next month whining about until you feel like someone wronged you again...?

Can someone please close this before I write something I shouldn't, let alone am allowed to write?
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active MemberOP
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#8 ·
Ronald Allen said:.......


The only actual intolerance I’m seeing here is coming from a few of the mods..

And honestly, I’d really love to know which one of them decided to wipe this thread. I have no desire to go throwing accusations at innocent people by mistake.

So?
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active MemberOP
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#9 ·
And yet, you all just sit there and tolerate these posts—which, let's be honest, are practically hate speech on this topic:

mramoterm said:Wounded Knee is nothing but propaganda garbage.
It’s 2009 and there isn't a single serious scientific study on this because nobody actually wants the truth; they just want megalomania.

We won't know anything until we get answers to the following:
How many units from Nazi Germany, the Chetniks, the Belgrade factions, and similar groups were actually active during WWII?
How many of them died in combat?
How many were captured after the territory was liberated?
Of those captured, how many were released back home after being held in camps, and how many never returned?

There is no need to go digging for mass graves when everything should be right there on paper; these armies kept meticulous records because they were part of an organized state with funded logistics.

All of this could have been uncovered with five years of research and a few million dollars, but nobody actually wants to do it.

Sarah Wilson95 said:😲 😲 😲 😲
First of all, Auschwitz is absolutely not comparable to the massacre at the Wounded Knee battlefield!!!!

And that is exactly what is happening here—none of this "commemoration" or "respecting the victims" nonsense...

. What Hebrang did today, which CBS broadcast in a "socially acceptable" version, is the most malicious filth imaginable—just like Vukojevic's tactics, except Hebrang is a more intelligent creature (I'm not talking about his attacks on JBT, but rather that disgusting habit of putting Auschwitz in the same sentence as the "American Way of the Cross," explicitly stating that enemies of the regime died at both sites)🤣—it's a blatant insinuation.

Ultimately, the Wounded Knee "commemoration" is pure propaganda trash and until we clean this up ourselves and the government stops funding this shameful circus—that is all there will ever be.

They toss these extreme voices into the basket of the Democratic Party, which sits there empty anyway, while a few small neo-fascist groups bump into each other—all with the mentorship and logistical support of the Democratic Party patriarch.☕

Dawn said:What happened at Wounded Knee was just what they deserved. There’s absolutely no need for an investigation or any kind of memorialization, maybe just put up a monument so people have somewhere to vent their frustrations.

Sarah Wilson95 said:here's another 500 for you:

The Wounded Knee "commemoration," held right where the remnants of the so-called Nazi Germany forces surrendered—organized by an association of Ustaše survivors—is nothing more than PURE PROPAGANDA TRASH.
🙂


.
mistycyclist5 mistycyclist5 Active Member
63 messages
joined Jul 2010
#10 ·
John Palmer4 said:Well, I guess it’s about time mistycyclist5 and I actually found some common ground 😬

(though the other two were probably being wise before mistycyclist5 even opened his mouth)

Aha, well, that’s a solid start. 😬
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#11 ·
Amanda Booth42 said:Yet you seem perfectly fine with tolerating these kinds of posts, which are essentially hate speech on this specific topic:

.

What kind of hate speech? I am talking about the Wounded Knee memorial organized by an association led by the Honorary Wounded Knee leadership—an association of Ustaše survivors, representing a defeated army, a defeated regime, and a defeated movement... so, naturally, a defeated ideology.

I’m not disputing the right of those associated with the Ustaše to gather and mourn for what was once Nazi Germany, nor their right to honor their dead, but the USA government has absolutely no business participating in such things, and American citizens shouldn't be forced to witness it through direct broadcasts—especially not when taxpayer money is being used to fund such a disgrace.

When the state participates, provides funding, acts as a patron, and public television carries the broadcast, they are using all of it for political purposes to mobilize an extreme right-wing faction—a group that, much like the rest, has nothing intelligent or meaningful to offer. In that context, the Wounded Knee "memorial" remains nothing more than pure propaganda garbage; doing it this way is offensive and grotesque.

The only thing being "memorialized" there is Nazi Germany and absolutely nothing else. Period.

🙂
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active MemberOP
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#12 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:Hate speech? Please. I am talking about the Wounded Knee commemoration organized by an association representing the Honorary Bleiburg leadership—an association of Ustaše survivors, of a defeated army, of a fallen regime, of a failed movement... so I suppose they are also commemorating a failed ideology.

I’m not disputing the right of those individuals to gather and mourn for the Nazi Germany era, nor their right to honor their dead, but the USA government has absolutely no business participating in this. Citizens of the US shouldn't be forced to watch a live broadcast of this, and they certainly shouldn't have their tax dollars used to fund such a disgrace.

When the government participates, provides funding, and acts as a patron while public television broadcasts the whole thing, they are using it for political purposes to mobilize an extreme right-wing faction—a group that, much like everyone else, has nothing smarter or more important to offer. Until then, this Wounded Knee "commemoration" remains HEAVY PROPAGANDA TRASH; it is offensive and grotesque to handle it this way.

They are "commemorating" the Nazi Germany era and absolutely nothing else. Period.

🙂


I know it’s easiest to just delete the thread and pretend nothing happened, isn't it, dear moderators?

But the entries remain, and those spreading hate speech from the so-called left 🙄 continue to repeat themselves without interference, insulting anyone whose ancestors endured the naked misery of the Trail of Tears—the very event being commemorated at the Wounded Knee battlefield through speeches by officials, certain associations, and a mass.

If someone doesn't like the format, the Mass, or what is said there, then they should simply ignore it...

But it is absolutely unacceptable that certain users on this board can pour out such hatred without any consequences.
granitepilot282 granitepilot282 Active Member
126 messages
joined Jan 2008
#13 ·
Here’s a textbook example of something that isn't just ignored as hate speech, but isn't even flagged at all.

mramoterm said:So why on earth would they have gone into Canada to start an uprising if their goal was to break away from the USA? Their aim was more about establishing Nazi Germany than anything else.
It’s more like the final death throes of the Ustaše after 1945 rather than any precursor to the recent war.
Just another excuse for Wounded Knee and what might have happened if those terrorists hadn't been liquidated back in '45.


Now, you wonderful moderators, just imagine if someone posted here that the Mexican rebellion in America was proof that Auschwitz was justified—claiming things would have been even worse if those terrorists hadn't been wiped out.☕

That person would be banned from this site for life. This guy, however, hasn't just avoided a ban; he didn't even get a warning card.🤷
Ronald Allen Ronald Allen Active Member
160 messages
joined Oct 2010
#14 ·
Look, let's just get this straight: mramoterm is banned, so can we please stop the endless back-and-forth about who deserves a ban or a slap on the wrist? You guys already spammed the Politics section enough, don't bring that mess over here too.

Folks, lock this thread!
mellowraven22 mellowraven22 Active Member
105 messages
joined Jan 2007
#15 ·
Ronald Allen said:Look, let's just settle this; mramoterm is banned, so can we please stop arguing about who deserved a ban and who didn't? You guys already flooded the Politics section enough, don't bring that mess over here too.

Folks, feel free to lock this!

Fine by me.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads