CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Software › Windows 7 transformation packs!

Windows 7 transformation packs!

Started by Jerry Rogers2 · · 👁 4 views · 42 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jerry Rogers2Noah Miller6briskbison41Brandon Morgan10Drew Garciadarkviper7mistymarlin6rustydriver23Benjamin Watson2
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#21 ·
Heh... yeah, I actually went through that exact same thing. I ended up having to wipe my entire C: drive just to get rid of Windows Vista.
In my case, "better safe than sorry" was already too little, too late.😁
Even if you're running a fresh install, I’d still suggest running a defragmentation every once in a while just to be sure.😉
As for Leopard, why don't you post some screenshots?😁
mistymarlin6 mistymarlin6 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2007
#22 ·
So, I finally got Leopard installed 😁. Everything feels solid, mostly, though there are a few little quirks that bug me personally. Since this is just a beta, I assume they'll iron those out eventually. One thing is that progress bar—you know, when you're moving files from one folder to another? It doesn't have finished edges. They didn't bother rounding them off, so it looks a bit... unpolished. And then there's the highlight color; it’s still stuck on blue. I'm not sure if that's how it works in the final version of Leopard, but it feels a bit off to me. Otherwise, it’s functional, and I haven't run into any major hiccups in my workflow.
I should mention that during the initial setup, I went ahead and installed all those extra programs that are basically useless bloatware. I've since scrubbed them out, leaving only that icon tool, "ubericon."
I gave Vista and Windows 7 a quick spin too. Honestly? After a few minutes, I think those two actually feel better than Leopard. Probably because they're Microsoft products. With Leopard, some of the icons from Windows XP-era apps look a bit weird, but I suspect that can be tweaked later. Anyway, that's enough from me. Here are a few screenshots.
image
image
image
image
image

EDIT: Oh, right—I forgot to mention, I wiped the filenames just so nobody thinks they're missing.😁
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#23 ·
Alright, I see what's going on here.🙂 The icons look a lot like they did in Vista, but honestly, I’m not a fan of how lifeless the whole thing feels.😁 Both Vista and Windows 7 have more color, whereas it looks like Leopard just sticks to that default blue and gray palette.
You might want to mess around with the Display Properties in there; you could probably find something a bit more interesting if you dig deep enough.
I don't know this OS inside and out, but I feel like the design could have been handled a lot better. From what I can tell, the Recycle Bin is just carried over from Vista.
I played around with Windows 7 for a little bit once, and personally, I wasn't feeling those windows either. Since Vista has all those different options under Display Properties / appearance / Sub Design, I figured Windows 7 would have had something similar—like that Windows Vista 32-bit icon set.
You've got Google Chrome installed too. Heh... that's definitely not the most reliable browser out there.😁
Jerry Rogers2 Jerry Rogers2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Oct 2008
#24 ·
briskbison41 said:And then there's Google Chrome. Heh... let's just say it isn't exactly the gold standard for reliability.😁


Honestly, you might as well just go with Safari (even if it's still stuck in beta); it’s basically trying to be the best of both Mozilla and Chrome combined!

Just a side note—I tried applying a Windows 7 skin myself, and I wasn't particularly impressed. It’s not terrible, per se, but the taskbar just doesn't sit right with me. Besides, the aesthetic is pretty much a carbon copy of Vista!

Oh, and it's definitely a lot more colorful than Leopard!😁
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#25 ·
They’d be better off giving Opera 9 a shot.
Regarding Windows 7... I'm with you on most things, except for that bit about the taskbar. Personally, the taskbar is the only thing I actually like about it.
Leopard just doesn't really fit in with that specific pack when you're looking at it alongside Windows 7 and Vista.
mistymarlin6 mistymarlin6 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2007
#26 ·
Honestly, I’ve cycled through just about every browser out there. For now, I’m sticking with Google Chrome because it’s lightweight and keeps things simple. As for reliability? Hard to say for sure, but so far, everything has been running smooth as silk without a single glitch 😁. To be fair, I haven't actually given Safari a real shot yet. Maybe one day, once Chrome finally shows its cracks 😁
. Regarding Leopard... it’s just a different beast entirely. Windows Vista and Windows 7 occupy one world, while OS X is in a universe of its own. I don't know, personally, I find Leopard more aesthetically pleasing... at least for the moment. Windows 7 didn't exactly win my heart at first sight, though I might give it a whirl later if I get bored with Leopard. It feels a bit sterile, that blue-gray color scheme, but I actually love it. In fact, I'm so hooked on Leopard right now that I'm seriously considering making the jump to OS X full-time 😍
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#27 ·
Yeah, but Google Chrome keeps crashing on me—at least it does on my machine—so I made the jump over to Firefox and it’s working perfectly fine. It's way faster than Internet Explorer, though from what I hear, the new Internet Explorer 8 is actually pretty decent, so maybe that's worth testing out.
Leopard is basically just like Mac OS. Leopard uses these little tricks with how it handles desktop icons. To be honest, the only thing about Windows 7 that really caught my eye was the taskbar, but once I realized Display Properties didn't have those Windows Vista 32-bit pixel icons, I decided to stick with Vista.😁
I'm with you there... it feels a bit "sterile."
mistymarlin6 mistymarlin6 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2007
#28 ·
Well, I’ve been lucky so far; Chrome hasn't been crashing on me at all, at least for the moment.😁
As for Windows 7, I get what you mean about the taskbar, but honestly? It just didn't have that overall aesthetic charm that Leopard had. Though, I suppose it would be smarter to just install actual Windows 7 and see how it goes, rather than messing around with some transformation pack.
Jerry Rogers2 Jerry Rogers2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Oct 2008
#29 ·
Well, I can finally say the deed is done: I’ve officially cycled through just about every transformation pack out there!🙂

In the end, I decided to go with the Leopard look. And honestly? It’s actually quite good. If I had to give an overall impression, it’s great—though I have to admit, my absolute favorite part is the sound design. Those startup and shutdown tones, plus the little audio cues when you minimize or maximize windows... they really nail the vibe.😂

Color-wise, though, it feels a bit lifeless compared to Windows 7, which has much more 🤣.
But yeah, just like you all pointed out, it definitely feels a bit "sterile."😁
rustydriver23 rustydriver23 Member
11 messages
joined Oct 2010
#30 ·
I mean, if you really want to get the best transformation pack, I guess you'd go with the one made specifically for Vista Vista, but for Windows 7 Windows 7, you definitely want 😉
mistymarlin6 mistymarlin6 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2007
#31 ·
Jerry Rogers2 said:minimizing and maximizing!

And then you right-click... *screech* 🤣, it starts getting a little annoying 😁

rustydriver23 said:The best transformation pack is for Vista Vista, and then there's the one for Windows 7 Windows 7

Well, I wouldn't say that about Vista. If someone is running a lower-end machine, half of it is just going to lag... but for Windows 7? Definitely. If you're feeling lazy, a transformation pack is the way to go.😁
rustydriver23 rustydriver23 Member
11 messages
joined Oct 2010
#32 ·
So, I ended up messing around with that Windows 7 build 7068 for a bit, but after about three days of dealing with it, I just wiped it clean and went back to Vista. My TV tuner was acting all wonky and wouldn't work right, so yeah, if you're thinking about trying that specific build, maybe just be careful or something.
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#33 ·
mistymarlin6 said:Well, I'm lucky enough that Chrome isn't falling apart on me. At least for now.😁
And regarding Windows 7, I agree the taskbar is cool, but it didn't feel as visually appealing as Leopard overall. Honestly, though, I think it would be better to just install actual Windows 7 and see how it goes rather than messing around with a transformation pack.

Luckily enough,😁
Personally, I prefer the Windows 7 taskbar over what you get on Leopard (even if Leopard is more colorful).
But right now, it doesn't seem worth installing Windows 7 on my machine (at least not until they polish it up a bit).
Plus, it eats up a lot of memory, so...

Jerry Rogers2 said:So, I can finally brag that I've tried pretty much every single transformation pack out there!🙂

In the end, I went with the Leopard look! And I have to say, it's great. As far as the overall vibe goes, it's awesome—my favorite parts are definitely the startup and shutdown sounds, plus the ones for minimizing and maximizing windows!😂

Color-wise, it feels a bit lifeless (compared to 7, it's way 🤣)
But yeah, like you guys mentioned, it feels "sterile."😁

Every single one?😁
When it comes to the sound effects, Vista has those too (startup, maximizing, etc.).
It's definitely annoying how limited the default color palette is (just gray and blue).
mistymarlin6 mistymarlin6 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2007
#34 ·
briskbison41 said:But there’s really no point in installing 7 on your PC right now (at least not until they actually fix things up)

It's not worth it, period. But if you just want to see what the aesthetic looks like, I think installing Windows 7 is a smarter move than messing around with some random transformation pack.
Jerry Rogers2 Jerry Rogers2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Oct 2008
#35 ·
briskbison41 said:Honestly,😁
I actually find the taskbar on Windows 7 to be superior to what you get on Leopard (even if Leopard is a bit more colorful)*.
That said, I wouldn't bother installing 7 on my machine just yet—at least not until they iron out the kinks.
Plus, my RAM usage is high enough as it is, so...

Every single one?😁
Regarding sound effects, Vista has them too (startup sounds, minimizing windows, etc.)**.

The real annoyance is how limited those default color schemes are; it’s just a handful of grays and blues.


*Actually, Leopard isn't any more colorful; if anything, it feels a bit dull because of those exact same default colors.

**True, at least from what I can tell, and I've seen quite a few.😬
As for the sound effects: sure, Vista has them, just like any other OS, but the problem is they don't exactly sound great. In fact, after a little while, they start to become quite grating.😢
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#36 ·
mistymarlin6 said:It’s not worth doing permanently. But if you just want to see how it looks, I think installing Windows 7 is a better move than messing around with any random transformation pack.

It depends on what you're looking for, just make sure you don't try to install both operating systems on the same partition. (For instance, trying to put Windows XP and 7 together). If you do that, you could end up wiping everything on that drive.
(I actually lost 40 GB of files doing exactly that once:/)

Jerry Rogers2 said:*But Leopard isn't more colorful; if anything, it feels kind of dull because of those default colors!

When I said "colorful," I meant when you start piling all those icons onto the taskbar.😁
The way it is now feels pretty neutral.

mistymarlin6 said:**Yeah, at least for any I can think of, and I know plenty!😬
As for those sound effects; I know Vista has them, just like any other OS, but the thing is they don't actually sound that great. Honestly, after a little while, they just start getting on your nerves!😢

Regarding packs, I know about Vista Inspiration, ISSP pack 4, pack 5, and maybe three others whose names escape me right now.
Have you given Windowblinds a shot?
True... after a while, those kinds of sound effects get old, but if they're decent, they can be pleasant to listen to.😁
mistymarlin6 mistymarlin6 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2007
#37 ·
briskbison41 said:Whatever works for you, I guess.

Right, well, I’m talking about an average PC here... and honestly, that's precisely why I feel like no third-party software can ever truly replicate the real thing. That's why I figured it'd be smarter to just install Windows🙂
directly. And by the way, regarding that third point you quoted... that wasn't even me writing. 😁
Jerry Rogers2 Jerry Rogers2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Oct 2008
#38 ·
briskbison41 said:Regarding those skin packs, I'm familiar with Windows Vista, Service Pack 4 and 5, plus maybe three other ones whose names have slipped my mind.
Have you ever messed around with WindowBlinds?


I've cycled through all of them, including Windows Ultra Blue, Crystal Clear Pack, Windows 7 Remix, Vista Transformation Pack 9, and even VistaMizer!
And yes, I’ve certainly given WindowBlinds a whirl too. My computer is an absolute beast!😢
briskbison41 briskbison41 Active Member
145 messages
joined Sep 2009
#39 ·
mistymarlin6 said:I’m talking about an average PC here, and that’s exactly why I feel this way—no third-party software is ever going to truly replicate the original experience. That’s why I figured it would be better to just go ahead and install Windows.🙂
And by the way, that third thing you’re quoting? I didn't write that. 😁

Let’s be real: no skinning pack is ever going to be a 100% perfect clone of the original OS. If you're looking for an exact carbon copy, you're chasing a ghost. That said, most of them are solid enough imitations if you just want to change the vibe.
If you've got plenty of extra storage space on your drive, you might as well go ahead and install it.🙂
Honestly, only the hard drive works for me right now. There’s really no point in bothering with installing Windows 7 at this stage, and if I'm being real, I actually prefer Windows Vista better—at least for the time being. Both Windows Vista and Windows 7 take up roughly 7 GB of space, depending on which specific package you're running.
Once they finally wrap up work on Windows 7, I'll see what the end result actually looks like.

Jerry Rogers2 said:I've tried every single one of them. Windows Ultra Blue, I’ve been digging through some old files lately and came across the Crystal Clear Pack. It’s one of those niche skinning projects that really takes you back to how much effort people used to put into customizing their desktop environments. Looking at it now, it’s interesting to see how different the aesthetic feels compared to the standard UI we're used to today. It definitely has its own specific vibe., I’ve been looking into the Windows 7 Remix lately. It’s an interesting project, though I have my doubts about how much it actually changes the core experience versus just slapping a skin on top of what’s already there. Personally, I prefer things to be a bit more stable, but I can see why people want to tinker with the UI to get that specific look they're after., I’ve been looking into the Vista Transformation Pack 9 lately. It’s one of those things that really changes how you interact with your desktop, though people tend to have very strong opinions about it. I remember back when I first started messing around with OS customization, I spent hours trying to get my setup just right, tweaking every little visual element until it felt cohesive. Using something like Vista Transformation Pack 9 is a bit of a trip down memory lane for me. It attempts to pull certain aesthetic elements from Windows Vista over to other versions of Windows, which can be hit or miss depending on how much stability you're willing to trade for a specific look. Some people swear by these types of packs to breathe life into an older system, while others think it's just more bloat. Personally, I find the results interesting, but you definitely need to know what you're getting into before you start swapping out system files. I don't know what you're trying to get at here. You just dropped a single letter. If you have a question or something specific you want to discuss, just say it. I'm not going to guess what's on your mind. VistaMizer!
Yeah, I actually gave it a shot too. I’ve been messing around with WindowBlinds lately, and honestly, it’s one of those tools that people either absolutely love or completely misunderstand. I remember back in the day when I first started customizing my desktop setup, I spent hours trying to get everything to look just right without breaking the OS. It’s a bit of a rabbit hole. If you’re looking to overhaul the way your interface feels, it can definitely add that extra layer of polish, but you have to be careful about how much you throw at it at once. You don't want your system feeling sluggish just because you wanted a specific aesthetic. It’s all about balance. Personally, I like keeping things relatively clean, but there's a certain satisfaction in seeing a fully cohesive theme running on your machine.My computer is a total piece of junk!😢

I have no idea what David is talking about.
I guess it’s a decent enough program.
What's wrong with your computer? Seriously, what's the deal?😁
Jerry Rogers2 Jerry Rogers2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Oct 2008
#40 ·
briskbison41 said:I have no idea what David is.
I assume it's a decent enough program.
Why on earth is your PC acting like crap?😁


Oh, you know, nothing major—I just felt like playing around with it for a bit. I thought the Start menu looked pretty cool!
http://downloads.phpnuke.org/screens...3aa59ba74d.jpg

And my computer is being a total pain because there isn't a single useful package or program available that actually works with it!😂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads