CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Complaint about the philosophy moderator

Complaint about the philosophy moderator

Started by Sandra Williams70 · · 👁 7 views · 24 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Sandra Williams70John Roberts4Sarah Morgan2casualtiger2steelridge58hiddenhound3Harold James9Benjamin LongKenneth Peterson5restlessridge36Lawrence Ortiz87Bradley Lopez12hollowtrucker77
hiddenhound3 hiddenhound3 Regular
309 messages
joined Feb 2018
#21 ·
Lawrence Ortiz87 said:I find myself wondering why, whenever someone starts a thread regarding a specific issue, the entire discussion inevitably devolves into cheerleading. 🙄It seems as though certain individuals feel an inexplicable urge to defend the moderator’s personal character or their work, even when those things have absolutely nothing to do with the actual subject at hand.🙄

The fundamental issue here is that there isn't actually a problem to solve; rather, one individual perceives a problem where none exists, and a small group of people—who already tend to disregard our philosophy moderator—have simply rushed in to offer their misguided support.

On a side note, I consider it spam for anyone to claim that hiddenhound3 is uneducated, because from my reading of the opening post, that certainly isn't the core issue being discussed.

If there had been any genuine desire for resolution, this entire "controversy" could have been settled quite peacefully.
hiddenhound3 hiddenhound3 Regular
309 messages
joined Feb 2018
#22 ·
Lawrence Ortiz87 said:Since you seem intent on flooding this thread with questions, I might as well ask—where exactly are you located?

That is really none of your business.
Bradley Lopez12 Bradley Lopez12 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jan 2009
#23 ·
Based on the letter and the sentiment—that whole situation where nobody actually lives their own life, they just live through everyone else instead.😉
Lawrence Ortiz87 Lawrence Ortiz87 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jan 2009
#24 ·
I'm still thinking about what was said earlier regarding the whole situation... it’s just one of those things that stays on your mind, you know? It feels like we're all just trying to navigate through the noise, looking for some kind of clarity in everything... anyway, just my two cents... kaže:
The thing is, there isn't even an actual issue here... It’s just that Papa Smurf thinks there is one. And now, that tiny little handful of people who are always looking for any excuse to push around the philosophy moderator have all suddenly shown up, ready to jump to his defense...

Honestly, everyone spamming the thread saying hiddenhound3 isn't literate can just take a hike. From what I gathered reading that intro post, her being "uneducated" or whatever isn't even the real issue here...

If people actually wanted to, this whole "problem" could have been settled peacefully without all the drama...

Look, there’s a real issue here that actually needs addressing, and it starts with how people just rushed in to defend Wolverine. In my book, when you have a group jumping in like that, it naturally triggers a backlash from people who aren't on board, which is exactly why things got so messy. I don't get how you're looking at this through such a one-sided lens... It’s like a tiny handful of Enky’s loyalists just stepped in to bail them out, and honestly, it only makes the whole Papa Smurf situation even more complicated...
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#25 ·
The moderators actually have both the authority and the responsibility to keep this subforum in decent shape,
and look, sure, they’re going to screw up occasionally—just like anyone else actually putting in any kind of work around here, which is basically the whole point of having this board in the first place.
but honestly, if a thread is poorly constructed, it doesn't matter how much ego is involved; it's a clear signal to the mods that they need to either kill it, clean it up, or move it somewhere else where it makes sense.
those little unnecessary adjectives people throw around? They're usually just clutter, and frankly, they tend to say more about the low intelligence and questionable character of the person using them than anything else.
plus, you can always tell the difference between someone actually sharing a perspective and someone who’s just here to cheerlead for a side, though at this point, it really doesn't matter which side they're rooting for.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads